Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Budd-Chiari Syndrome

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Shrinjaya B. Thapa, Gabriel Roman Souza, Mahati Paravathaneni, Sean Cohen, Turab Mohammed, Damian A. Laber
{"title":"Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Budd-Chiari Syndrome","authors":"Shrinjaya B. Thapa,&nbsp;Gabriel Roman Souza,&nbsp;Mahati Paravathaneni,&nbsp;Sean Cohen,&nbsp;Turab Mohammed,&nbsp;Damian A. Laber","doi":"10.1111/ejh.14363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is managed by interventions aimed at relieving hepatic venous obstruction and anticoagulation. Despite robust data supporting the tolerability and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with other venous thromboembolism, its utility in BCS is not well documented. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of DOACs in Primary BCS from the available literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Published studies that reported data on patients with BCS treated with DOACs were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two retrospective studies and nine case reports met the criteria for inclusion. The combined data from these two retrospective studies include 58 patients administered DOAC and 101 patients treated with VKA/LMWH. The combined re-stenosis or failure rates after percutaneous endovascular intervention, angioplasty, TIPS, or OLT were 17.2% for the DOAC group and 15.8% for the LMWH/VKA group. The incidence of major bleeding was 8.62% in the DOAC group and 5.94% in the LMWH/VKA group, while minor bleeding rates were 20.7% and 4.95%, respectively. Procedure-related bleeding was 4.5% in DOAC group and 12.8% in VKA/LMWH group. Nine case reports using apixaban in 3, rivaroxaban in 5, and one with dabigatran- described patients tolerating the treatment well and experiencing no major adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>DOACs appear to be at least equally effective to LMWH/VKA for the anticoagulation of patients with BCS. We believe DOACs to be preferred over LMWH/VKA for the anticoagulation of patients with BCS due to the known advantages in administration, but randomized trials might be needed to answer this question.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11955,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Haematology","volume":"114 3","pages":"566-572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejh.14363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is managed by interventions aimed at relieving hepatic venous obstruction and anticoagulation. Despite robust data supporting the tolerability and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with other venous thromboembolism, its utility in BCS is not well documented. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of DOACs in Primary BCS from the available literature.

Methods

Published studies that reported data on patients with BCS treated with DOACs were included.

Results

Two retrospective studies and nine case reports met the criteria for inclusion. The combined data from these two retrospective studies include 58 patients administered DOAC and 101 patients treated with VKA/LMWH. The combined re-stenosis or failure rates after percutaneous endovascular intervention, angioplasty, TIPS, or OLT were 17.2% for the DOAC group and 15.8% for the LMWH/VKA group. The incidence of major bleeding was 8.62% in the DOAC group and 5.94% in the LMWH/VKA group, while minor bleeding rates were 20.7% and 4.95%, respectively. Procedure-related bleeding was 4.5% in DOAC group and 12.8% in VKA/LMWH group. Nine case reports using apixaban in 3, rivaroxaban in 5, and one with dabigatran- described patients tolerating the treatment well and experiencing no major adverse events.

Conclusions

DOACs appear to be at least equally effective to LMWH/VKA for the anticoagulation of patients with BCS. We believe DOACs to be preferred over LMWH/VKA for the anticoagulation of patients with BCS due to the known advantages in administration, but randomized trials might be needed to answer this question.

直接口服抗凝剂治疗布-恰里综合征。
目的:Budd-Chiari综合征(BCS)是通过缓解肝静脉阻塞和抗凝治疗来治疗的。尽管有强有力的数据支持直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)对其他静脉血栓栓塞患者的耐受性和有效性,但其在BCS中的应用尚未得到很好的证明。本研究旨在从现有文献中评估DOACs在原发性BCS中的疗效和耐受性。方法:纳入已发表的报告了DOACs治疗BCS患者数据的研究。结果:2项回顾性研究和9例病例报告符合纳入标准。这两项回顾性研究的综合数据包括58名接受DOAC治疗的患者和101名接受VKA/低分子肝素治疗的患者。经皮血管内介入、血管成形术、TIPS或OLT后再狭窄或失败率在DOAC组为17.2%,在低分子肝素/VKA组为15.8%。DOAC组大出血发生率为8.62%,低分子肝素/VKA组大出血发生率为5.94%,小出血发生率分别为20.7%和4.95%。DOAC组手术相关出血为4.5%,VKA/LMWH组为12.8%。9例使用阿哌沙班的3例,5例使用利伐沙班的5例,1例使用达比加群的报告称,患者对治疗耐受良好,没有发生重大不良事件。结论:在BCS患者的抗凝治疗中,DOACs似乎与低分子肝素/VKA至少同样有效。我们认为DOACs比低分子肝素/VKA更适合BCS患者的抗凝治疗,因为在给药方面有已知的优势,但可能需要随机试验来回答这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Haematology is an international journal for communication of basic and clinical research in haematology. The journal welcomes manuscripts on molecular, cellular and clinical research on diseases of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue, and on basic molecular and cellular research related to normal development and function of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue. The journal also welcomes reviews on clinical haematology and basic research, case reports, and clinical pictures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信