Nicole Felix, Larissa Teixeira, Alleh Nogueira, Amanda Godoi, Thomaz Alexandre Costa, Jacqueline Pirez, Riyad Yazan Kherallah, Frans Serpa, Felipe Kalil Beirão Alexandre, Maria do Carmo Andrade Duarte de Farias, Guilherme Vianna Silva
{"title":"Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.","authors":"Nicole Felix, Larissa Teixeira, Alleh Nogueira, Amanda Godoi, Thomaz Alexandre Costa, Jacqueline Pirez, Riyad Yazan Kherallah, Frans Serpa, Felipe Kalil Beirão Alexandre, Maria do Carmo Andrade Duarte de Farias, Guilherme Vianna Silva","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00710-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMI) have emerged as the first disease-specific, noninvasive therapy with promising results in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, its role in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) remains uncertain, especially in secondary endpoints of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to June 2024 for RCTs comparing CMI versus placebo in patients with oHCM. We applied a random-effects model to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes and primary or secondary outcomes of RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five RCTs comprising 767 patients, of whom 402 (52.5%) were randomized to CMI. Relative to placebo, CMI were associated with a higher rate of improvement of at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [risk ratio (RR) 2.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-2.82]. In addition, CMI reduced resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) [mean difference (MD) - 42.51 mmHg; 95% CI - 59.27 to - 25.75] and the provoked LVOT gradients (MD - 46.12 mmHg; 95% CI - 55.70 to - 36.54). However, CMI significantly increased the risk of reaching a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% (RR 4.80; 95% CI 1.42-16.20), affecting 8% of patients during long-term follow-up of up to 120 weeks. There was no significant interaction across subgroups of class representatives, pointing to a class effect. The benefit-risk analysis indicated a larger benefit for NYHA class improvement than risk for systolic dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with oHCM, mavacamten and aficamten as a class improve clinical and hemodynamic endpoints compared with placebo, albeit with a higher incidence of a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023468079.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00710-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMI) have emerged as the first disease-specific, noninvasive therapy with promising results in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, its role in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) remains uncertain, especially in secondary endpoints of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to June 2024 for RCTs comparing CMI versus placebo in patients with oHCM. We applied a random-effects model to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes and primary or secondary outcomes of RCTs.
Results: We included five RCTs comprising 767 patients, of whom 402 (52.5%) were randomized to CMI. Relative to placebo, CMI were associated with a higher rate of improvement of at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [risk ratio (RR) 2.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-2.82]. In addition, CMI reduced resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) [mean difference (MD) - 42.51 mmHg; 95% CI - 59.27 to - 25.75] and the provoked LVOT gradients (MD - 46.12 mmHg; 95% CI - 55.70 to - 36.54). However, CMI significantly increased the risk of reaching a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% (RR 4.80; 95% CI 1.42-16.20), affecting 8% of patients during long-term follow-up of up to 120 weeks. There was no significant interaction across subgroups of class representatives, pointing to a class effect. The benefit-risk analysis indicated a larger benefit for NYHA class improvement than risk for systolic dysfunction.
Conclusion: In patients with oHCM, mavacamten and aficamten as a class improve clinical and hemodynamic endpoints compared with placebo, albeit with a higher incidence of a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction.
期刊介绍:
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.