Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nicole Felix, Larissa Teixeira, Alleh Nogueira, Amanda Godoi, Thomaz Alexandre Costa, Jacqueline Pirez, Riyad Yazan Kherallah, Frans Serpa, Felipe Kalil Beirão Alexandre, Maria do Carmo Andrade Duarte de Farias, Guilherme Vianna Silva
{"title":"Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.","authors":"Nicole Felix, Larissa Teixeira, Alleh Nogueira, Amanda Godoi, Thomaz Alexandre Costa, Jacqueline Pirez, Riyad Yazan Kherallah, Frans Serpa, Felipe Kalil Beirão Alexandre, Maria do Carmo Andrade Duarte de Farias, Guilherme Vianna Silva","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00710-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMI) have emerged as the first disease-specific, noninvasive therapy with promising results in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, its role in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) remains uncertain, especially in secondary endpoints of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to June 2024 for RCTs comparing CMI versus placebo in patients with oHCM. We applied a random-effects model to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes and primary or secondary outcomes of RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five RCTs comprising 767 patients, of whom 402 (52.5%) were randomized to CMI. Relative to placebo, CMI were associated with a higher rate of improvement of at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [risk ratio (RR) 2.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-2.82]. In addition, CMI reduced resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) [mean difference (MD) - 42.51 mmHg; 95% CI - 59.27 to - 25.75] and the provoked LVOT gradients (MD - 46.12 mmHg; 95% CI - 55.70 to - 36.54). However, CMI significantly increased the risk of reaching a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% (RR 4.80; 95% CI 1.42-16.20), affecting 8% of patients during long-term follow-up of up to 120 weeks. There was no significant interaction across subgroups of class representatives, pointing to a class effect. The benefit-risk analysis indicated a larger benefit for NYHA class improvement than risk for systolic dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with oHCM, mavacamten and aficamten as a class improve clinical and hemodynamic endpoints compared with placebo, albeit with a higher incidence of a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023468079.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00710-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMI) have emerged as the first disease-specific, noninvasive therapy with promising results in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, its role in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) remains uncertain, especially in secondary endpoints of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to June 2024 for RCTs comparing CMI versus placebo in patients with oHCM. We applied a random-effects model to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes and primary or secondary outcomes of RCTs.

Results: We included five RCTs comprising 767 patients, of whom 402 (52.5%) were randomized to CMI. Relative to placebo, CMI were associated with a higher rate of improvement of at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [risk ratio (RR) 2.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-2.82]. In addition, CMI reduced resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) [mean difference (MD) - 42.51 mmHg; 95% CI - 59.27 to - 25.75] and the provoked LVOT gradients (MD - 46.12 mmHg; 95% CI - 55.70 to - 36.54). However, CMI significantly increased the risk of reaching a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% (RR 4.80; 95% CI 1.42-16.20), affecting 8% of patients during long-term follow-up of up to 120 weeks. There was no significant interaction across subgroups of class representatives, pointing to a class effect. The benefit-risk analysis indicated a larger benefit for NYHA class improvement than risk for systolic dysfunction.

Conclusion: In patients with oHCM, mavacamten and aficamten as a class improve clinical and hemodynamic endpoints compared with placebo, albeit with a higher incidence of a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023468079.

心肌肌球蛋白抑制剂治疗梗阻性肥厚性心肌病:随机安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析。
背景:心肌肌球蛋白抑制剂(CMI)已成为肥厚性心肌病患者首个疾病特异性、无创治疗方法。然而,其在梗阻性肥厚性心肌病(oHCM)中的作用仍不确定,特别是在随机对照试验(rct)的次要终点中。方法:我们系统地检索了PubMed, Embase, Web of Science和Clinicaltrials.gov从成立到2024年6月的rct,比较CMI和安慰剂对oHCM患者的影响。我们采用随机效应模型来评估随机对照试验的疗效和安全性结局以及主要或次要结局。结果:我们纳入了5项随机对照试验,包括767例患者,其中402例(52.5%)被随机分配到CMI组。与安慰剂相比,CMI与至少一个纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能等级的更高改善率相关[风险比(RR) 2.33;95%置信区间(CI) 1.92-2.82]。此外,CMI降低静息左心室流出道(LVOT)[平均差值(MD) - 42.51 mmHg;95% CI - 59.27 ~ - 25.75]和诱发LVOT梯度(MD - 46.12 mmHg;95% CI - 55.70 ~ - 36.54)。然而,CMI显著增加左心室射血分数低于50%的风险(RR 4.80;95% CI 1.42-16.20),在长达120周的长期随访中影响8%的患者。班级代表的子组之间没有显著的相互作用,表明存在班级效应。获益-风险分析表明,NYHA分级改善的获益大于收缩功能障碍的风险。结论:在oHCM患者中,与安慰剂相比,马伐卡坦和阿非卡坦可改善临床和血流动力学终点,尽管左室射血分数降低的发生率更高。注册号码:PROSPERO CRD42023468079。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信