Factors Associated With First-Trimester Prenatal Care Initiation In The United States: A Scoping Review.

Melissa B Eggen, Dani LaPreze, Seyed Karimi, Liza Creel, Bertis Little, Bridget Basile Ibrahim
{"title":"Factors Associated With First-Trimester Prenatal Care Initiation In The United States: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Melissa B Eggen, Dani LaPreze, Seyed Karimi, Liza Creel, Bertis Little, Bridget Basile Ibrahim","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>First-trimester prenatal care is an important component of quality care during pregnancy and is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Despite its importance, many pregnant people delay prenatal care initiation or receive no prenatal care. This scoping review assessed multilevel factors associated with first-trimester prenatal care initiation in the United States among studies that included a measure of prenatal care timing, using the socioecological model as an organizing framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines for reporting. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, and Social Sciences Abstracts were searched for peer-reviewed papers that focused on facilitators and barriers associated with first-trimester prenatal care initiation, were written in English, included a measure of prenatal care timing, and used data gathered after 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1469 articles identified in the search, 19 met inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Articles described intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental-level barriers and facilitators of first-trimester prenatal care initiation including Medicaid expansion, immigration status, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant heterogeneity in the measurement of prenatal care timing existed across studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings suggest that, although environmental domain factors have been impactful toward increasing population-level rates of first-trimester prenatal care initiation, benefits have not been equitable across sociodemographic factors. Increasing the proportion of pregnant people who initiate first-trimester prenatal care will require comprehensive efforts that address sociodemographic and contextual factors, including persistent structural and systemic barriers that cause and widen health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: First-trimester prenatal care is an important component of quality care during pregnancy and is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Despite its importance, many pregnant people delay prenatal care initiation or receive no prenatal care. This scoping review assessed multilevel factors associated with first-trimester prenatal care initiation in the United States among studies that included a measure of prenatal care timing, using the socioecological model as an organizing framework.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines for reporting. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, and Social Sciences Abstracts were searched for peer-reviewed papers that focused on facilitators and barriers associated with first-trimester prenatal care initiation, were written in English, included a measure of prenatal care timing, and used data gathered after 2014.

Results: Of the 1469 articles identified in the search, 19 met inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Articles described intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental-level barriers and facilitators of first-trimester prenatal care initiation including Medicaid expansion, immigration status, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant heterogeneity in the measurement of prenatal care timing existed across studies.

Discussion: Our findings suggest that, although environmental domain factors have been impactful toward increasing population-level rates of first-trimester prenatal care initiation, benefits have not been equitable across sociodemographic factors. Increasing the proportion of pregnant people who initiate first-trimester prenatal care will require comprehensive efforts that address sociodemographic and contextual factors, including persistent structural and systemic barriers that cause and widen health disparities.

美国第一胎产前护理启动的相关因素:范围审查。
引言:妊娠早期产前护理是妊娠期优质护理的重要组成部分,与围产期结局的改善有关。尽管它很重要,但许多孕妇推迟了产前护理的开始或没有得到产前护理。本研究以社会生态学模型为组织框架,评估了与美国妊娠早期产前护理开始相关的多层面因素,其中包括产前护理时间的测量。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所的范围评价方法进行范围评价,并遵循系统评价和元分析扩展范围评价指南的首选报告项目。检索PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、CINAHL和社会科学摘要,检索同行评议的论文,这些论文关注与妊娠早期产前护理开始相关的促进因素和障碍,以英文撰写,包括产前护理时间的测量,并使用2014年以后收集的数据。结果:在检索到的1469篇文章中,有19篇符合纳入标准,被纳入最终综述。文章描述了个人、人际和环境层面的障碍和促进因素,包括医疗补助扩大、移民身份和COVID-19大流行。各研究在产前护理时间测量上存在显著的异质性。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,尽管环境因素对提高人口水平的妊娠早期产前护理启动率有影响,但不同社会人口因素的益处并不公平。要提高孕妇在妊娠早期进行产前护理的比例,就需要作出综合努力,解决社会人口和环境因素,包括造成和扩大健康差距的持续存在的结构性和系统性障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信