Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2024-11-04 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095
Ermes Carulli, Suzy Browne, Sara Woolley, Alexander Tindale, Alison Pottle, Kate Nagle, Rebecca Lane, Navin Chandra, Niket Patel, Rodney De Palma, Gareth Barnes, Tito Kabir, Vasileios Panoulas, David Smith, Robert Smith, Sharon Clernon, Ee Ling Heng, Mohammed Akhtar, Mark Bowers, Ian McGovern, Thomas Lüscher, Miles Dalby
{"title":"Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.","authors":"Ermes Carulli, Suzy Browne, Sara Woolley, Alexander Tindale, Alison Pottle, Kate Nagle, Rebecca Lane, Navin Chandra, Niket Patel, Rodney De Palma, Gareth Barnes, Tito Kabir, Vasileios Panoulas, David Smith, Robert Smith, Sharon Clernon, Ee Ling Heng, Mohammed Akhtar, Mark Bowers, Ian McGovern, Thomas Lüscher, Miles Dalby","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic valve stenosis. The choice between TAVI, surgery, or a conservative approach should be based upon multiple factors including clinical considerations, technical feasibility, and informed patient preference. In this context, engaging patients in a shared decision-making (SDM) process becomes essential, but this practice is generally underused.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>To comply with the European and UK national guidelines, in January 2023 we established a structured SDM pathway in which patients are offered virtual/physical decision aids and after 1 week are invited to a meeting to reach a shared decision. From December 2022 to June 2023, a custom-developed questionnaire was prospectively administered to 23 patients prior to, and 38 patients after, the implementation of the SDM pathway. The answers to 12 core questions were recorded on a Likert scale (1-5). Global satisfaction, as measured by mean Likert score, was significantly higher for the post-SDM group than for the pre-SDM group (4.46 ± 0.14 vs. 3.78 ± 0.30, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The percentage of positive (Likert 4-5) responses was significantly higher in the post-SDM group (289/312, 92.6% vs. 155/234, 66.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The percentage of negative (Likert 1-2) responses was significantly lower in the post-SDM group (5/312, 1.6% vs. 53/234, 22.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SDM pathway proved effective in delivering SDM in compliance with national and international guidance. A similar approach leveraging digital technology to minimize cost and enhance patient convenience could be implemented for other treatments and across other institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"4 6","pages":"oeae095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic valve stenosis. The choice between TAVI, surgery, or a conservative approach should be based upon multiple factors including clinical considerations, technical feasibility, and informed patient preference. In this context, engaging patients in a shared decision-making (SDM) process becomes essential, but this practice is generally underused.

Methods and results: To comply with the European and UK national guidelines, in January 2023 we established a structured SDM pathway in which patients are offered virtual/physical decision aids and after 1 week are invited to a meeting to reach a shared decision. From December 2022 to June 2023, a custom-developed questionnaire was prospectively administered to 23 patients prior to, and 38 patients after, the implementation of the SDM pathway. The answers to 12 core questions were recorded on a Likert scale (1-5). Global satisfaction, as measured by mean Likert score, was significantly higher for the post-SDM group than for the pre-SDM group (4.46 ± 0.14 vs. 3.78 ± 0.30, P < 0.001). The percentage of positive (Likert 4-5) responses was significantly higher in the post-SDM group (289/312, 92.6% vs. 155/234, 66.2%, P < 0.001). The percentage of negative (Likert 1-2) responses was significantly lower in the post-SDM group (5/312, 1.6% vs. 53/234, 22.6%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The SDM pathway proved effective in delivering SDM in compliance with national and international guidance. A similar approach leveraging digital technology to minimize cost and enhance patient convenience could be implemented for other treatments and across other institutions.

在经导管主动脉瓣植入术前,通过专用路径和调查问卷实施和评估共同决策。
目的:对于主动脉瓣狭窄患者来说,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是手术主动脉瓣置换术的替代方案。选择经导管主动脉瓣植入术、外科手术还是保守治疗应基于多种因素,包括临床考虑、技术可行性和患者的知情偏好。在这种情况下,让患者参与共同决策(SDM)过程就变得至关重要,但这种做法普遍未得到充分利用:为了遵守欧洲和英国的国家指导方针,我们于 2023 年 1 月建立了结构化 SDM 途径,向患者提供虚拟/物理决策辅助工具,并在一周后邀请患者参加会议,以达成共同决策。从 2022 年 12 月到 2023 年 6 月,我们在 SDM 途径实施前和实施后分别对 23 名和 38 名患者进行了定制问卷调查。以李克特量表(1-5)记录了 12 个核心问题的答案。以平均 Likert 分数衡量,SDM 后组的总体满意度明显高于 SDM 前组(4.46 ± 0.14 vs. 3.78 ± 0.30,P < 0.001)。SDM后组的正面回答(Likert 4-5)比例明显高于SDM前组(289/312,92.6% vs. 155/234,66.2%,P < 0.001)。SDM后组的负面回答(Likert 1-2)比例明显较低(5/312,1.6% vs. 53/234,22.6%,P < 0.001):事实证明,SDM路径能有效实施SDM,符合国家和国际指导原则。其他治疗方法和机构也可采用类似方法,利用数字技术最大限度地降低成本,为患者提供更多便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信