Tumor mutational burden as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Dheeman Futela, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Ezgi Guler, Brandon Declouette, Christopher Hoimes, Nikhil H Ramaiya
{"title":"Tumor mutational burden as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.","authors":"Dheeman Futela, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Ezgi Guler, Brandon Declouette, Christopher Hoimes, Nikhil H Ramaiya","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the utility of tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy at a single tertiary cancer center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, out of 1044 patients treated with ICIs between January 2010 and November 2018, 75 patients (38 males and 37 females) with a mean age of 62 (range 22-87) years, who had information about TMB and adequate imaging, were included. Imaging response was determined according to iRECIST criteria. Predictors of objective response were analysed using non-parametric tests, and progression-free survival and overall survival were analysed using log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median TMB was 7.2 mutations/mb [interquartile range: 4-13.5]. The objective radiologic response rate according to iRECIST was 26.7 % (20 patients) and the median time to best response was 61 days [IQR: 47-88 days]. Median TMB in responders (12.5 [IQR: 5-18] muts/mb) was significantly higher than in non-responders (6 [IQR: 3-12] muts/mb) (p = 0.0293). Median TMB was higher in responders in the subgroup of patients treated with Nivolumab (20 vs 4 muts/mb, P = .0043), but not significantly in those treated with Pembrolizumab (9 vs 6 muts/mb, P = .211). There was no difference in PFS (p = 0.37, Log-Rank) or OS (p = 0.053, Log-Rank) between TMB low and high groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher TMB was associated with objective response to ICI, however, TMB was an imperfect biomarker for PFS and OS in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93969,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.12.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy at a single tertiary cancer center.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, out of 1044 patients treated with ICIs between January 2010 and November 2018, 75 patients (38 males and 37 females) with a mean age of 62 (range 22-87) years, who had information about TMB and adequate imaging, were included. Imaging response was determined according to iRECIST criteria. Predictors of objective response were analysed using non-parametric tests, and progression-free survival and overall survival were analysed using log-rank test.

Results: Median TMB was 7.2 mutations/mb [interquartile range: 4-13.5]. The objective radiologic response rate according to iRECIST was 26.7 % (20 patients) and the median time to best response was 61 days [IQR: 47-88 days]. Median TMB in responders (12.5 [IQR: 5-18] muts/mb) was significantly higher than in non-responders (6 [IQR: 3-12] muts/mb) (p = 0.0293). Median TMB was higher in responders in the subgroup of patients treated with Nivolumab (20 vs 4 muts/mb, P = .0043), but not significantly in those treated with Pembrolizumab (9 vs 6 muts/mb, P = .211). There was no difference in PFS (p = 0.37, Log-Rank) or OS (p = 0.053, Log-Rank) between TMB low and high groups.

Conclusion: Higher TMB was associated with objective response to ICI, however, TMB was an imperfect biomarker for PFS and OS in our study.

将肿瘤突变负荷作为免疫检查点抑制剂放射反应的标志物。
目的:本研究旨在评估肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)作为一个单一三级癌症中心对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的放射学反应标志物的效用:在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了2010年1月至2018年11月期间接受ICIs治疗的1044名患者,其中75名患者(38名男性和37名女性)有TMB信息和充分的影像学资料,平均年龄62岁(22-87岁)。根据 iRECIST 标准确定影像学反应。采用非参数检验分析客观反应的预测因素,采用对数秩检验分析无进展生存期和总生存期:TMB中位数为7.2个突变/mb[四分位数间距:4-13.5]。根据iRECIST标准,客观放射学反应率为26.7%(20例患者),最佳反应时间中位数为61天[IQR:47-88天]。有反应者的中位 TMB(12.5 [IQR: 5-18] muts/mb)明显高于无反应者(6 [IQR: 3-12] muts/mb)(p = 0.0293)。在接受 Nivolumab 治疗的患者亚组中,应答者的中位 TMB 较高(20 vs 4 muts/mb,P = .0043),但在接受 Pembrolizumab 治疗的患者亚组中,应答者的中位 TMB 并不明显(9 vs 6 muts/mb,P = .211)。TMB低组和高组间的PFS(P = 0.37,Log-Rank)或OS(P = 0.053,Log-Rank)没有差异:结论:较高的 TMB 与 ICI 的客观反应相关,但在我们的研究中,TMB 并不是 PFS 和 OS 的完美生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信