Use of a large language model (LLM) for ambulance dispatch and triage.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Aditya C Shekhar, Joshua Kimbrell, Aaryan Saharan, Jacob Stebel, Evan Ashley, Ethan E Abbott
{"title":"Use of a large language model (LLM) for ambulance dispatch and triage.","authors":"Aditya C Shekhar, Joshua Kimbrell, Aaryan Saharan, Jacob Stebel, Evan Ashley, Ethan E Abbott","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Large language models (LLMs) have grown in popularity in recent months and have demonstrated advanced clinical reasoning ability. Given the need to prioritize the sickest patients requesting emergency medical services (EMS), we attempted to identify if an LLM could accurately triage ambulance requests using real-world data from a major metropolitan area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An LLM (ChatGPT 4o Mini, Open AI, San Francisco, CA, USA) with no prior task-specific training was given real ambulance requests from a major metropolitan city in the United States. Requests were batched into groups of four, and the LLM was prompted to identify which of the four patients should be prioritized. The same groupings of four requests were then shown to a panel of experienced critical care paramedics who voted on which patient should be prioritized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 98 groupings of four ambulance requests (392 total requests), the LLM agreed with the paramedic panel in most cases (76.5 %, n = 75). In groupings where the paramedic panel was unanimous in their decision (n = 48), the LLM agreed with the unanimous panel in 93.8 % of groupings (n = 45).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our preliminary analysis indicates LLMs may have the potential to become a useful tool for triage and resource allocation in emergency care settings, especially in cases where there is consensus among subject matter experts. Further research is needed to better understand and clarify how they may best be of service.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"89 ","pages":"27-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Large language models (LLMs) have grown in popularity in recent months and have demonstrated advanced clinical reasoning ability. Given the need to prioritize the sickest patients requesting emergency medical services (EMS), we attempted to identify if an LLM could accurately triage ambulance requests using real-world data from a major metropolitan area.

Methods: An LLM (ChatGPT 4o Mini, Open AI, San Francisco, CA, USA) with no prior task-specific training was given real ambulance requests from a major metropolitan city in the United States. Requests were batched into groups of four, and the LLM was prompted to identify which of the four patients should be prioritized. The same groupings of four requests were then shown to a panel of experienced critical care paramedics who voted on which patient should be prioritized.

Results: Across 98 groupings of four ambulance requests (392 total requests), the LLM agreed with the paramedic panel in most cases (76.5 %, n = 75). In groupings where the paramedic panel was unanimous in their decision (n = 48), the LLM agreed with the unanimous panel in 93.8 % of groupings (n = 45).

Conclusions: Our preliminary analysis indicates LLMs may have the potential to become a useful tool for triage and resource allocation in emergency care settings, especially in cases where there is consensus among subject matter experts. Further research is needed to better understand and clarify how they may best be of service.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信