Predictors of Enrollment and Adherence in a Randomized Tobacco Cessation Clinical Trial.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X241308136
Zhanette Coffee, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Todd W Vanderah, Judith S Gordon
{"title":"Predictors of Enrollment and Adherence in a Randomized Tobacco Cessation Clinical Trial.","authors":"Zhanette Coffee, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Todd W Vanderah, Judith S Gordon","doi":"10.1177/1179173X241308136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New therapeutic cessation approaches are being tested in clinical trials to engage and retain people who smoke. Our team is conducting a pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) to evaluate a new treatment for tobacco dependence, but enrolling participants and ensuring adherence has been more challenging than in previous trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the predictors of enrollment and adherence in the RCT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary analysis of data from a tobacco cessation RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected during a two-group RCT testing the efficacy of an integrative guided imagery vs behavioral treatment, with both conditions involving six weekly, hour-long sessions over 9 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1074 randomized participants, 803 (74.8%) enrolled (completed the first session), and 631 (78.6%) of those were adherent (attended all scheduled sessions). Variables associated with enrollment included age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.0003-1.02; <i>P</i> = 0.04) and state of residence (West Virginia vs New York (NY), AOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.94; <i>P</i> = 0.02), with older participants and those from NY more likely to enroll. Variables associated with adherence included race (Black vs White) (AOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.05-4.16; <i>P</i> = 0.04), higher education (at least some college vs high school or less) (AOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.58-3.26; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), marital status (all others vs single/never married) (AOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.11-2.48; <i>P</i> = 0.01), and state of residence (Arizona vs NY) (AOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.78; <i>P</i> = 0.002). Within Arizona, older age increased enrollment, while higher education and marriage improved adherence. Within NY, higher education was associated with both increased enrollment and adherence, while higher number of household smokers, and not reporting substance use were associated with increased adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enrolling and retaining people who smoke in cessation trials requires novel strategies. Identifying predictors of enrollment and adherence offers valuable insights for overcoming barriers in future tobacco cessation RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"17 ","pages":"1179173X241308136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X241308136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New therapeutic cessation approaches are being tested in clinical trials to engage and retain people who smoke. Our team is conducting a pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) to evaluate a new treatment for tobacco dependence, but enrolling participants and ensuring adherence has been more challenging than in previous trials.

Objective: To determine the predictors of enrollment and adherence in the RCT.

Design: A secondary analysis of data from a tobacco cessation RCT.

Methods: Data was collected during a two-group RCT testing the efficacy of an integrative guided imagery vs behavioral treatment, with both conditions involving six weekly, hour-long sessions over 9 weeks.

Results: Of the 1074 randomized participants, 803 (74.8%) enrolled (completed the first session), and 631 (78.6%) of those were adherent (attended all scheduled sessions). Variables associated with enrollment included age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.0003-1.02; P = 0.04) and state of residence (West Virginia vs New York (NY), AOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.94; P = 0.02), with older participants and those from NY more likely to enroll. Variables associated with adherence included race (Black vs White) (AOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.05-4.16; P = 0.04), higher education (at least some college vs high school or less) (AOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.58-3.26; P < 0.0001), marital status (all others vs single/never married) (AOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.11-2.48; P = 0.01), and state of residence (Arizona vs NY) (AOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.78; P = 0.002). Within Arizona, older age increased enrollment, while higher education and marriage improved adherence. Within NY, higher education was associated with both increased enrollment and adherence, while higher number of household smokers, and not reporting substance use were associated with increased adherence.

Conclusion: Enrolling and retaining people who smoke in cessation trials requires novel strategies. Identifying predictors of enrollment and adherence offers valuable insights for overcoming barriers in future tobacco cessation RCTs.

随机戒烟临床试验的注册和坚持治疗的预测因素。
背景:临床试验正在测试新的戒烟治疗方法,以吸引和留住吸烟者。我们的团队正在开展一项务实的随机临床试验(RCT),以评估一种治疗烟草依赖的新疗法,但与以往的试验相比,招募参与者并确保其坚持治疗更具挑战性:目标:确定RCT的入组和坚持治疗的预测因素:设计:对一项戒烟 RCT 数据进行二次分析:在一项测试综合引导想象疗法与行为疗法疗效的两组 RCT 试验中收集了数据,两种疗法均在 9 周内每周进行 6 次、每次一小时的疗程:在 1074 名随机参与者中,有 803 人(74.8%)注册(完成第一次疗程),其中 631 人(78.6%)坚持治疗(参加了所有预定疗程)。与注册相关的变量包括年龄(调整赔率 [AOR],1.01;95% CI,1.0003-1.02;P = 0.04)和居住州(西弗吉尼亚州 vs 纽约州,AOR,0.66;95% CI,0.46-0.94;P = 0.02),年龄较大和来自纽约州的参与者更有可能注册。与坚持治疗相关的变量包括种族(黑人 vs 白人)(AOR,2.09;95% CI,1.05-4.16;P = 0.04)、受教育程度(至少大专 vs 高中或以下)(AOR,2.27;95% CI,1.58-3.26;P <0.0001)、婚姻状况(所有其他 vs 单身/从未结婚)(AOR,1.66;95% CI,1.11-2.48;P =0.01)和居住州(亚利桑那州 vs 纽约州)(AOR,0.52;95% CI,0.34-0.78;P =0.002)。在亚利桑那州,年龄越大,注册人数越多,而教育程度越高和婚姻状况越好。在纽约州,受教育程度越高,加入人数越多,坚持率也越高,而家庭吸烟人数越多、未报告药物使用情况则与坚持率提高有关:结论:在戒烟试验中招募和留住吸烟者需要新的策略。确定入组和坚持治疗的预测因素为克服未来戒烟研究试验中的障碍提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信