Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate as a Prerequisite for Prescription of Inhaler Devices: A Cross-sectional Study.

Q3 Medicine
Spandan Biswas, Jai Kishan Karahyla, Sameer Singhal, Tushar Nehra, Ajit Yadav
{"title":"Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate as a Prerequisite for Prescription of Inhaler Devices: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Spandan Biswas, Jai Kishan Karahyla, Sameer Singhal, Tushar Nehra, Ajit Yadav","doi":"10.59556/japi.72.0741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inhaler therapy has become the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases. Although patients, and to a certain extent doctors also, were not initially comfortable with inhalation devices, they have now become the standard of care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. However, the choice of inhaler device prescribed in different subsets of patients is still not clear. Prescription of a device depends upon age, dexterity, hand-mouth coordination, and peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR). Prescription of wrong inhaler and wrong technique is not uncommon. In our study, 52.6% cases had prescription of wrong inhaler device, as per their PIFR. Physicians often do not consider the PIFR and the respiratory effort of the patient, while advising inhaler device. Only 43% patients with asthma had an adequate asthma control [asthma control test (ACT) > 19]. One of the main causes of a general inability to use an inhaler device properly results from the generation of an inadequate PIFR. It is more pronounced in those using dry powder inhalers (DPI), as it requires a higher effort-dependent inspiratory flow rate. PIFR of patients was divided into four groups, ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 L/minute. The required PIFR was taken as 30-60 L/minute for metered dose inhaler (MDI) and >60 L/minute for DPI. A positive correlation was noted for PIFR and advice to change the device as per the readings (p = 0.05). A positive correlation was also noted with PIFR compared to smoking/biomass use (p = 0.002). Thus, clinicians should advise inhalers as per PIFR and also continue to monitor PIFR on subsequent visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"72 12","pages":"27-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inhaler therapy has become the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases. Although patients, and to a certain extent doctors also, were not initially comfortable with inhalation devices, they have now become the standard of care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. However, the choice of inhaler device prescribed in different subsets of patients is still not clear. Prescription of a device depends upon age, dexterity, hand-mouth coordination, and peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR). Prescription of wrong inhaler and wrong technique is not uncommon. In our study, 52.6% cases had prescription of wrong inhaler device, as per their PIFR. Physicians often do not consider the PIFR and the respiratory effort of the patient, while advising inhaler device. Only 43% patients with asthma had an adequate asthma control [asthma control test (ACT) > 19]. One of the main causes of a general inability to use an inhaler device properly results from the generation of an inadequate PIFR. It is more pronounced in those using dry powder inhalers (DPI), as it requires a higher effort-dependent inspiratory flow rate. PIFR of patients was divided into four groups, ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 L/minute. The required PIFR was taken as 30-60 L/minute for metered dose inhaler (MDI) and >60 L/minute for DPI. A positive correlation was noted for PIFR and advice to change the device as per the readings (p = 0.05). A positive correlation was also noted with PIFR compared to smoking/biomass use (p = 0.002). Thus, clinicians should advise inhalers as per PIFR and also continue to monitor PIFR on subsequent visits.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信