Distinguishing Characteristics of Benign Versus Malignant Intraosseous Schwannomas: A Comparative Study.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1111/os.14321
Jiangchao Zhang, Ge Xiong, Wei Zheng, Jing Sun
{"title":"Distinguishing Characteristics of Benign Versus Malignant Intraosseous Schwannomas: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Jiangchao Zhang, Ge Xiong, Wei Zheng, Jing Sun","doi":"10.1111/os.14321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Benign and malignant intraosseous schwannomas are rare, and primarily documented in case reports. This study aims to elucidate the differences in clinical features and imaging manifestations between these tumors. This will help clinicians identify malignant lesions at an early stage, reliable guide treatment decisions, and accurately predict outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen patients who underwent surgery and got pathological examinations in our hospital from 2012 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 14 cases were found benign with 4 malignant. In the benign group, patients underwent curettage followed by bone grafting, whereas the malignant group was treated with extensive resection or amputation. Patients' demographics and radiographic features, including gender, age at diagnosis, symptom duration, tumor location, tumor margin, and the ratio of sclerotic margins were documented and compared between these tumors. All imaging was reviewed by two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists, who also quantified the sclerotic margin ratio. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine inter-observer agreement. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for continuous clinical variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our series, the mean age of these patients was 43.1 ± 14.0 years, six patients were male and 12 were female. Pain was the predominant preoperative symptom. The average duration from symptom onset to initial physician visit was 28.5 ± 25.3 months for benign schwannomas and 8.3 ± 4.3 months for malignant schwannomas (p = 0.012). On plain radiographs, 13 (13/14) of benign schwannomas exhibited well-defined margins of bone destruction, compared to 1 (1/4) of malignant schwannomas (p = 0.019). Furthermore, benign schwannomas had a significantly higher sclerotic margin ratio (75.5%) than malignant ones (16.7%) (p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of cortical bone destruction (p = 1.0). On MRI, both tumors demonstrated intermediate to slightly hypointense signal intensity on T1-weighted images and heterogeneous high signal intensities on T2-weighted images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite their rarity, benign and malignant intraosseous schwannomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with painful and radiographically lytic bone lesions, especially in the mandible, sacrum, and vertebrae. The ratio of sclerotic margins, which we proposed for the first time, in combination with symptom duration and the clarity of tumor margins, provide valuable diagnostic clues for distinguishing the malignancy of the tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"753-761"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Benign and malignant intraosseous schwannomas are rare, and primarily documented in case reports. This study aims to elucidate the differences in clinical features and imaging manifestations between these tumors. This will help clinicians identify malignant lesions at an early stage, reliable guide treatment decisions, and accurately predict outcomes.

Methods: Eighteen patients who underwent surgery and got pathological examinations in our hospital from 2012 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 14 cases were found benign with 4 malignant. In the benign group, patients underwent curettage followed by bone grafting, whereas the malignant group was treated with extensive resection or amputation. Patients' demographics and radiographic features, including gender, age at diagnosis, symptom duration, tumor location, tumor margin, and the ratio of sclerotic margins were documented and compared between these tumors. All imaging was reviewed by two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists, who also quantified the sclerotic margin ratio. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine inter-observer agreement. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for continuous clinical variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.

Results: In our series, the mean age of these patients was 43.1 ± 14.0 years, six patients were male and 12 were female. Pain was the predominant preoperative symptom. The average duration from symptom onset to initial physician visit was 28.5 ± 25.3 months for benign schwannomas and 8.3 ± 4.3 months for malignant schwannomas (p = 0.012). On plain radiographs, 13 (13/14) of benign schwannomas exhibited well-defined margins of bone destruction, compared to 1 (1/4) of malignant schwannomas (p = 0.019). Furthermore, benign schwannomas had a significantly higher sclerotic margin ratio (75.5%) than malignant ones (16.7%) (p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of cortical bone destruction (p = 1.0). On MRI, both tumors demonstrated intermediate to slightly hypointense signal intensity on T1-weighted images and heterogeneous high signal intensities on T2-weighted images.

Conclusions: Despite their rarity, benign and malignant intraosseous schwannomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with painful and radiographically lytic bone lesions, especially in the mandible, sacrum, and vertebrae. The ratio of sclerotic margins, which we proposed for the first time, in combination with symptom duration and the clarity of tumor margins, provide valuable diagnostic clues for distinguishing the malignancy of the tumors.

区分良性与恶性骨内许旺瘤的特征:比较研究
目的:良性和恶性骨内神经鞘瘤是罕见的,主要记录在病例报告。本研究旨在阐明这些肿瘤在临床特征和影像学表现上的差异。这将有助于临床医生在早期阶段识别恶性病变,可靠地指导治疗决策,并准确预测结果。方法:回顾性分析我院2012 ~ 2023年收治的18例手术及病理检查患者的资料。其中良14例,恶性4例。良性组患者行刮除后植骨,恶性组患者行大面积切除或截肢。记录患者的人口统计学和影像学特征,包括性别、诊断年龄、症状持续时间、肿瘤位置、肿瘤边缘和硬化边缘的比例,并在这些肿瘤之间进行比较。所有影像学检查由两名训练有素的肌肉骨骼放射科医生进行,他们也量化了硬化边缘比率。类内相关系数用于确定观察者间的一致性。对连续临床变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验,对分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。结果:本组患者的平均年龄为43.1±14.0岁,男性6例,女性12例。术前主要症状为疼痛。良性神经鞘瘤患者从症状出现到首次就诊的平均时间为28.5±25.3个月,恶性神经鞘瘤患者为8.3±4.3个月(p = 0.012)。在x线平片上,13例(13/14)良性神经鞘瘤表现出明确的骨破坏边缘,而恶性神经鞘瘤为1例(1/4)(p = 0.019)。良性神经鞘瘤的硬化缘比(75.5%)明显高于恶性神经鞘瘤(16.7%)(p = 0.001)。在皮质骨破坏方面,两组无统计学差异(p = 1.0)。在MRI上,这两个肿瘤在t1加权图像上表现为中等至轻微的低信号强度,在t2加权图像上表现为不均匀的高信号强度。结论:尽管其罕见,良恶性骨内神经鞘瘤应考虑在鉴别诊断中表现为疼痛和影像学溶解性骨病变,特别是在下颌骨,骶骨和椎骨。我们首次提出硬化边缘比值,结合症状持续时间和肿瘤边缘清晰度,为区分肿瘤的恶性提供了有价值的诊断线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信