Hailey A. Thompson , Hannah M. Brinkman , Kianoush B. Kashani , Kristin C. Cole , Erica D. Wittwer , Patrick M. Wieruszewski
{"title":"Early high-dose vasopressors in refractory septic shock: A cohort study","authors":"Hailey A. Thompson , Hannah M. Brinkman , Kianoush B. Kashani , Kristin C. Cole , Erica D. Wittwer , Patrick M. Wieruszewski","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into ‘early’ and ‘late’ groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (<em>n</em> = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58–0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17–1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 155004"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088394412400491X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into ‘early’ and ‘late’ groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.
Results
The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (n = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58–0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17–1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.
Conclusions
In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.