Lithium Use During Pregnancy in 14 Countries.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Felix Wittström, Carolyn E Cesta, Brian T Bateman, Marie Bendix, Mette Bliddal, Adrienne Y L Chan, Yongtai Cho, Eun-Young Choi, Jacqueline M Cohen, Sarah Donald, Mika Gissler, Alys Havard, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Krista F Huybrechts, Bianca Kollhorst, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai, Maarit K Leinonen, Brian M H Li, Kenneth K C Man, Vanessa W S Ng, Lianne Parkin, Laura Pazzagli, Lotte Rasmussen, Ran S Rotem, Tania Schink, Ju-Young Shin, Duong T Tran, Ian C K Wong, Helga Zoega, Johan Reutfors
{"title":"Lithium Use During Pregnancy in 14 Countries.","authors":"Felix Wittström, Carolyn E Cesta, Brian T Bateman, Marie Bendix, Mette Bliddal, Adrienne Y L Chan, Yongtai Cho, Eun-Young Choi, Jacqueline M Cohen, Sarah Donald, Mika Gissler, Alys Havard, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Krista F Huybrechts, Bianca Kollhorst, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai, Maarit K Leinonen, Brian M H Li, Kenneth K C Man, Vanessa W S Ng, Lianne Parkin, Laura Pazzagli, Lotte Rasmussen, Ran S Rotem, Tania Schink, Ju-Young Shin, Duong T Tran, Ian C K Wong, Helga Zoega, Johan Reutfors","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>In pregnancy, the benefits of lithium treatment for relapse prevention in psychiatric conditions must be weighed against potential teratogenic effects. Currently, there is a paucity of information on how and when lithium is used by pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine lithium use in the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used individual-level data of pregnancies from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021, in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, Iceland, Israel, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK, and 2 cohorts in the US. Analyses were performed from September 1 to November 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>The prevalence of lithium use as the proportion of pregnancies with at least 1 prescription fill or prescription within 3 months before pregnancy until childbirth was estimated using a common protocol. Lithium use during pregnancy by trimester and in the 3 months before and after pregnancy was examined.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Comparison of prevalence between the first and last 3-year periods of available data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 21 659 454 pregnancies from all collaborating sites, the prevalence of lithium use ranged from 0.07 per 1000 pregnancies in Hong Kong to 1.56 per 1000 in the US publicly insured population. Lithium use increased per 1000 pregnancies in 10 populations (Australia [0.60 to 0.74], Denmark [0.09 to 0.51], Finland [0.10 to 0.29], Iceland [0.24 to 0.99], Israel [0.25 to 0.37], Norway [0.24 to 0.47], South Korea [0.30 to 0.44], Sweden [0.42 to 1.07], the UK [0.07 to 0.10], and Taiwan [0.15 to 0.19]), remained stable in 4 populations (Germany [0.17 to 0.16], Hong Kong [0.06 to 0.06], and the publicly [1.50 to 1.34] and commercially [0.38 to 0.36] insured US populations), and decreased in 1 population (New Zealand [0.54 to 0.39]). Use of lithium decreased with each trimester of pregnancy, while prevalence of postpartum use was similar to prepregnancy levels. The proportion of lithium use in the second trimester compared with the prepregnancy period ranged from 2% in South Korea to 80% in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Prevalence of lithium use in pregnant women over the past 2 decades varied markedly between populations. Patterns of use before, during, and after pregnancy suggest that many women discontinued lithium use during pregnancy and reinitiated treatment after childbirth, with large variations between countries. These findings underscore the need for internationally harmonized guidelines, specifically for psychiatric conditions among pregnant women that may benefit from lithium treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 12","pages":"e2451117"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: In pregnancy, the benefits of lithium treatment for relapse prevention in psychiatric conditions must be weighed against potential teratogenic effects. Currently, there is a paucity of information on how and when lithium is used by pregnant women.

Objective: To examine lithium use in the perinatal period.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used individual-level data of pregnancies from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021, in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, Iceland, Israel, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK, and 2 cohorts in the US. Analyses were performed from September 1 to November 30, 2023.

Exposures: The prevalence of lithium use as the proportion of pregnancies with at least 1 prescription fill or prescription within 3 months before pregnancy until childbirth was estimated using a common protocol. Lithium use during pregnancy by trimester and in the 3 months before and after pregnancy was examined.

Main outcomes and measures: Comparison of prevalence between the first and last 3-year periods of available data.

Results: Among 21 659 454 pregnancies from all collaborating sites, the prevalence of lithium use ranged from 0.07 per 1000 pregnancies in Hong Kong to 1.56 per 1000 in the US publicly insured population. Lithium use increased per 1000 pregnancies in 10 populations (Australia [0.60 to 0.74], Denmark [0.09 to 0.51], Finland [0.10 to 0.29], Iceland [0.24 to 0.99], Israel [0.25 to 0.37], Norway [0.24 to 0.47], South Korea [0.30 to 0.44], Sweden [0.42 to 1.07], the UK [0.07 to 0.10], and Taiwan [0.15 to 0.19]), remained stable in 4 populations (Germany [0.17 to 0.16], Hong Kong [0.06 to 0.06], and the publicly [1.50 to 1.34] and commercially [0.38 to 0.36] insured US populations), and decreased in 1 population (New Zealand [0.54 to 0.39]). Use of lithium decreased with each trimester of pregnancy, while prevalence of postpartum use was similar to prepregnancy levels. The proportion of lithium use in the second trimester compared with the prepregnancy period ranged from 2% in South Korea to 80% in Denmark.

Conclusions and relevance: Prevalence of lithium use in pregnant women over the past 2 decades varied markedly between populations. Patterns of use before, during, and after pregnancy suggest that many women discontinued lithium use during pregnancy and reinitiated treatment after childbirth, with large variations between countries. These findings underscore the need for internationally harmonized guidelines, specifically for psychiatric conditions among pregnant women that may benefit from lithium treatment.

14 个国家的孕期锂使用情况。
重要性:在妊娠期,必须权衡锂治疗对预防精神疾病复发的益处与潜在的致畸影响。目前,有关孕妇如何及何时使用锂的信息很少:目的:研究围产期锂的使用情况:这项队列研究使用了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间澳大利亚、丹麦、芬兰、德国、香港、冰岛、以色列、新西兰、挪威、韩国、瑞典、中国台湾、英国和美国两个队列的个人怀孕数据。分析时间为 2023 年 9 月 1 日至 11 月 30 日:使用通用方案估算了锂的使用率,即在怀孕前 3 个月至分娩前至少开过一次处方或处方的孕妇比例。主要结果和测量指标:结果:在 21 659 454 名孕妇中,有 21 659 454 人使用了锂:在所有合作地点的 21 659 454 例妊娠中,锂的使用率从香港的每 1000 例妊娠中 0.07 例到美国公共保险人口的每 1000 例妊娠中 1.56 例不等。在 10 个国家(澳大利亚[0.60 至 0.74]、丹麦[0.09 至 0.51]、芬兰[0.10 至 0.29]、冰岛[0.24 至 0.99]、以色列[0.25 至 0.37]、挪威[0.24 至 0.47]、韩国[0.30 至 0.44]、瑞典[0.42 至 1.07]、英国[0.07至0.10],以及台湾[0.15至0.19]),4个国家保持稳定(德国[0.17至0.16],香港[0.06至0.06],以及公开[1.50至1.34]和商业[0.38至0.36]投保的美国人群),1个国家有所下降(新西兰[0.54至0.39])。锂的使用随着怀孕期的增加而减少,而产后锂的使用率与孕前水平相似。与孕前相比,第二个孕期使用锂的比例从韩国的 2% 到丹麦的 80% 不等:在过去的 20 年中,不同人群中孕妇使用锂的比例差异显著。孕前、孕中及孕后使用锂的模式表明,许多妇女在怀孕期间停止使用锂,并在分娩后重新开始治疗,各国之间的差异很大。这些研究结果表明,有必要制定国际统一的指南,特别是针对孕妇中可能受益于锂治疗的精神疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信