Overall survival, cause of death and time interval between diagnosis and death after Stanford type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD).

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Daniel Becker, Alexander Slongo, Murat Yildiz, Selim Mosbahi, Michel Joseph Bosiers, Silvan Jungi, Florian Schoenhoff, Drosos Kotelis, Vladimir Makaloski
{"title":"Overall survival, cause of death and time interval between diagnosis and death after Stanford type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD).","authors":"Daniel Becker, Alexander Slongo, Murat Yildiz, Selim Mosbahi, Michel Joseph Bosiers, Silvan Jungi, Florian Schoenhoff, Drosos Kotelis, Vladimir Makaloski","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezae437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess survival rates and the causes of both early and late mortality in patients with Stanford type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on all consecutive patients presenting with TBAAD from 2000 to 2018 at a single tertiary care centre. The primary end-point was early (<3 months) and late (>3 months) survival following TBAAD, with causes of both early and late mortality evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 274 patients, with a mean age of 64 ± 13 years, were included. Among these, 155 patients (57%) presented with uncomplicated TBAAD, including 52 (19%) identified as high-risk, and 119 patients (43%) had complicated TBAAD. Early aorta-related mortality occurred in 9 patients (3.3%), all within the complicated TBAAD group. The median follow-up period for the entire cohort was 8.5 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6-11.2]. Long-term survival was significantly higher in patients with uncomplicated TBAAD compared to those with complicated TBAAD (P < 0.001). Both complicated and high-risk uncomplicated TBAAD cases required significantly more interventions in the chronic phase (>3 months) compared to uncomplicated TBAAD cases [hazard ratio (HR) 9.8, 95% CI 6.4-15.4, P < 0.001; HR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1-5.1, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complicated TBAAD presents the greatest risk for aorta-related mortality and interventions. Patients with high-risk uncomplicated TBAAD are also notable for an increased rate of aorta-related mortality and interventions. Thorough evaluation of clinical and anatomical characteristics is essential for determining the optimal therapeutic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess survival rates and the causes of both early and late mortality in patients with Stanford type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all consecutive patients presenting with TBAAD from 2000 to 2018 at a single tertiary care centre. The primary end-point was early (<3 months) and late (>3 months) survival following TBAAD, with causes of both early and late mortality evaluated.

Results: A total of 274 patients, with a mean age of 64 ± 13 years, were included. Among these, 155 patients (57%) presented with uncomplicated TBAAD, including 52 (19%) identified as high-risk, and 119 patients (43%) had complicated TBAAD. Early aorta-related mortality occurred in 9 patients (3.3%), all within the complicated TBAAD group. The median follow-up period for the entire cohort was 8.5 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6-11.2]. Long-term survival was significantly higher in patients with uncomplicated TBAAD compared to those with complicated TBAAD (P < 0.001). Both complicated and high-risk uncomplicated TBAAD cases required significantly more interventions in the chronic phase (>3 months) compared to uncomplicated TBAAD cases [hazard ratio (HR) 9.8, 95% CI 6.4-15.4, P < 0.001; HR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1-5.1, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Complicated TBAAD presents the greatest risk for aorta-related mortality and interventions. Patients with high-risk uncomplicated TBAAD are also notable for an increased rate of aorta-related mortality and interventions. Thorough evaluation of clinical and anatomical characteristics is essential for determining the optimal therapeutic approach.

B 型急性主动脉夹层(TBAAD)后的总生存率、死亡原因以及诊断与死亡之间的时间间隔。
目的:本研究旨在评估Stanford B型主动脉夹层(TBAAD)患者的生存率以及早期和晚期死亡的原因。方法:回顾性分析2000年至2018年在一家三级医疗中心连续就诊的所有TBAAD患者。主要终点是TBAAD后的早期(3个月)生存,并评估了早期和晚期死亡的原因。结果:共纳入274例患者,平均年龄64±13岁。其中,155例(57%)患者为无并发症TBAAD,其中52例(19%)为高危患者,119例(43%)患者为合并TBAAD。9例患者(3.3%)发生早期主动脉相关死亡,均属于复杂TBAAD组。整个队列的中位随访期为8.5年(95% CI: 7.6-11.2)。无并发症TBAAD患者的长期生存率明显高于无并发症TBAAD患者(p = 3个月)(HR = 9.8, 95% CI = 6.4-15.4, p)。结论:并发症TBAAD是主动脉相关死亡和干预的最大风险。高危非并发症TBAAD患者也显著增加了主动脉相关死亡率和干预率。全面评估临床和解剖特征是确定最佳治疗方法的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信