Left ventricular systolic function after percutaneous coronary intervention: patterns of change and prognosis according to clinical presentation of coronary artery disease.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Gjin Ndrepepa, Salvatore Cassese, Michael Joner, Hendrik B Sager, Sebastian Kufner, Erion Xhepa, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Heribert Schunkert, Adnan Kastrati
{"title":"Left ventricular systolic function after percutaneous coronary intervention: patterns of change and prognosis according to clinical presentation of coronary artery disease.","authors":"Gjin Ndrepepa, Salvatore Cassese, Michael Joner, Hendrik B Sager, Sebastian Kufner, Erion Xhepa, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Heribert Schunkert, Adnan Kastrati","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02588-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether there are differences in the left ventricular ejection fraction change (ΔLVEF) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its association with long-term prognosis according to coronary artery disease (CAD) presentations is unknown. We assessed ΔLVEF after PCI and its association with 5-year mortality in various CAD presentations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 8181 patients with paired (before and 6-8 months after PCI) angiographic LVEF measurements: 4582 patients with chronic coronary disease (CCD), 1972 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and 1627 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). ΔLVEF (LVEF at 6-8 months minus baseline LVEF) was classified as follows: decline (ΔLVEF < 0), moderate improvement (ΔLVEF > 0 to < 10%) and large improvement (ΔLVEF ≥ 10%). The primary endpoint was 5 year mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with CCD, NSTE-ACS and STEMI, ΔLVEF (median [25th-75th percentiles]) was 0.0% [- 3.0%; 4.0%], 1.0% [- 2.0%; 5.0%] and 3.0% [- 2.0%; 10.0%], respectively (P < 0.001). In patients with a decline, moderate improvement and large improvement of LVEF, 5-year mortality was 10.0%, 10.4% and 12.3% in patients with CCD, 10.8%, 10.7% and 18.1% in patients with NSTE-ACS and 10.6%, 8.2% and 5.2% in patients with STEMI. After adjustment, ΔLVEF was associated with 5-year mortality in patients with CCD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [0.83-0.97]) and STEMI (adjusted HR = 0.85 [0.75-0.95]) but not in patients with NSTE-ACS (adjusted HR = 0.97 [0.85-1.10]), with all 3 risk estimates calculated for 5% increment in the ΔLVEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The type of CAD presentation appears to impact both LVEF change after PCI and its association with 5-year mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02588-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether there are differences in the left ventricular ejection fraction change (ΔLVEF) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its association with long-term prognosis according to coronary artery disease (CAD) presentations is unknown. We assessed ΔLVEF after PCI and its association with 5-year mortality in various CAD presentations.

Methods: This study included 8181 patients with paired (before and 6-8 months after PCI) angiographic LVEF measurements: 4582 patients with chronic coronary disease (CCD), 1972 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and 1627 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). ΔLVEF (LVEF at 6-8 months minus baseline LVEF) was classified as follows: decline (ΔLVEF < 0), moderate improvement (ΔLVEF > 0 to < 10%) and large improvement (ΔLVEF ≥ 10%). The primary endpoint was 5 year mortality.

Results: In patients with CCD, NSTE-ACS and STEMI, ΔLVEF (median [25th-75th percentiles]) was 0.0% [- 3.0%; 4.0%], 1.0% [- 2.0%; 5.0%] and 3.0% [- 2.0%; 10.0%], respectively (P < 0.001). In patients with a decline, moderate improvement and large improvement of LVEF, 5-year mortality was 10.0%, 10.4% and 12.3% in patients with CCD, 10.8%, 10.7% and 18.1% in patients with NSTE-ACS and 10.6%, 8.2% and 5.2% in patients with STEMI. After adjustment, ΔLVEF was associated with 5-year mortality in patients with CCD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [0.83-0.97]) and STEMI (adjusted HR = 0.85 [0.75-0.95]) but not in patients with NSTE-ACS (adjusted HR = 0.97 [0.85-1.10]), with all 3 risk estimates calculated for 5% increment in the ΔLVEF.

Conclusions: The type of CAD presentation appears to impact both LVEF change after PCI and its association with 5-year mortality.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左室收缩功能的改变模式与冠状动脉疾病临床表现的预后
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后左心室射血分数变化(ΔLVEF)是否存在差异,以及不同冠状动脉疾病(CAD)表现形式的左心室射血分数变化与长期预后的关系尚不清楚。我们评估了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的ΔLVEF及其与各种CAD表现的5年死亡率的关系:本研究纳入了 8181 例血管造影 LVEF 成对测量(PCI 前和 PCI 后 6-8 个月)的患者:4582例慢性冠状动脉疾病(CCD)患者、1972例非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者和1627例ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者。ΔLVEF(6-8 个月时的 LVEF 减去基线 LVEF)分为以下几种情况:下降(ΔLVEF 0 至 结果:ΔLVEF 0 至ΔLVEF 0);下降(ΔLVEF 0 至ΔLVEF 0):在CCD、NSTE-ACS和STEMI患者中,ΔLVEF(中位数[第25-75百分位数])分别为0.0%[- 3.0%; 4.0%]、1.0%[- 2.0%; 5.0%]和3.0%[- 2.0%; 10.0%](P 结论:CCD、NSTE-ACS和STEMI患者的ΔLVEF(中位数[第25-75百分位数])对心血管疾病的发病类型似乎有影响:CAD的表现类型似乎会影响PCI后LVEF的变化及其与5年死亡率的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信