Víctor Castro-Urda, Melodie Segura-Dominguez, Diego Jiménez-Sánchez, Cristina Aguilera-Agudo, Paula Vela-Martín, Alvaro Lorente-Ros, Daniel García-Rodriguez, David Sánchez-Ortiz, Chinh Pham-Trung, Eusebio García-Izquierdo, Susana Mingo-Santos, Jorge Toquero-Ramos, Ignacio Fernández-Lozano
{"title":"Superior Vena Cava Isolation With Cryoballoon in AF Ablation: Randomized CAVAC AF Trial.","authors":"Víctor Castro-Urda, Melodie Segura-Dominguez, Diego Jiménez-Sánchez, Cristina Aguilera-Agudo, Paula Vela-Martín, Alvaro Lorente-Ros, Daniel García-Rodriguez, David Sánchez-Ortiz, Chinh Pham-Trung, Eusebio García-Izquierdo, Susana Mingo-Santos, Jorge Toquero-Ramos, Ignacio Fernández-Lozano","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Superior vena cava (SVC) has been considered a specific trigger in atrial fibrillation development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the efficacy and safety of combining cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with SVC ablation compared with PVI alone in 100 patients with paroxysmal or non-long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Patients were randomly assigned to either the PVI+SVC ablation group or the PVI-only group. Each patient was given a mobile device to record a daily ECG and detect atrial tachyarrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary end point, freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence between 91 and 365 days post-catheter ablation, did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (62.9% versus 72%; <i>P</i>=0.41). However, the PVI+SVC group exhibited higher rates of phrenic nerve paralysis (20.8% versus 6%; <i>P</i>=0.003) and transient sinus node injury (18.8% versus 0%; <i>P</i>=0.001) compared with the PVI-only group. The median burden of atrial tachyarrhythmia showed no significant difference (<i>P</i>=0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of SVC ablation to PVI did not enhance freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 12 months, and it led to increased complications. These findings do not support the routine inclusion of SVC ablation in cryoballoon procedures for first-time catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or non-long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e012917"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Superior vena cava (SVC) has been considered a specific trigger in atrial fibrillation development.
Methods: We investigated the efficacy and safety of combining cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with SVC ablation compared with PVI alone in 100 patients with paroxysmal or non-long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Patients were randomly assigned to either the PVI+SVC ablation group or the PVI-only group. Each patient was given a mobile device to record a daily ECG and detect atrial tachyarrhythmias.
Results: The primary end point, freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence between 91 and 365 days post-catheter ablation, did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (62.9% versus 72%; P=0.41). However, the PVI+SVC group exhibited higher rates of phrenic nerve paralysis (20.8% versus 6%; P=0.003) and transient sinus node injury (18.8% versus 0%; P=0.001) compared with the PVI-only group. The median burden of atrial tachyarrhythmia showed no significant difference (P=0.91).
Conclusions: The addition of SVC ablation to PVI did not enhance freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 12 months, and it led to increased complications. These findings do not support the routine inclusion of SVC ablation in cryoballoon procedures for first-time catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or non-long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
背景:上腔静脉(SVC)被认为是房颤发展的特定触发因素。方法:对100例阵发性或非长期持续性心房颤动患者进行低温球囊肺静脉分离(PVI)联合SVC消融与单独PVI的疗效和安全性进行比较。患者被随机分配到PVI+SVC消融组或仅PVI消融组。每个病人都有一个移动设备来记录每天的心电图和检测房性心动过速。结果:主要终点——导管消融后91天至365天无房性心动过速复发,两组间无显著差异(62.9% vs 72%;P = 0.41)。然而,PVI+SVC组表现出更高的膈神经麻痹率(20.8%比6%;P=0.003)和一过性窦结损伤(18.8% vs 0%;P=0.001)。心房性心动过速的中位负荷差异无统计学意义(P=0.91)。结论:在PVI的基础上增加SVC消融并不能提高12个月房性心动过速的自由度,而且会导致并发症的增加。这些发现不支持在阵发性或非长期持续性房颤患者首次导管消融的低温球囊手术中常规纳入SVC消融。
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.