Midazolam and Ketamine for Convulsive Status Epilepticus in the Out-of-Hospital Setting.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Tony Zitek, Kenneth A Scheppke, Peter Antevy, Charles Coyle, Sebastian Garay, Eric Scheppke, David A Farcy
{"title":"Midazolam and Ketamine for Convulsive Status Epilepticus in the Out-of-Hospital Setting.","authors":"Tony Zitek, Kenneth A Scheppke, Peter Antevy, Charles Coyle, Sebastian Garay, Eric Scheppke, David A Farcy","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To determine if ketamine, when added to midazolam for the treatment of out-of-hospital seizures, is associated with an increase in the rate of cessation of convulsions prior to hospital arrival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of out-of-hospital patients with an active convulsive seizure being transported to a hospital by a large emergency medical services system in Florida, using data from August 1, 2015 and August 5, 2024. Per protocol, patients received midazolam first for their seizure. Starting in June 2017, a new protocol was developed in which patients who continued to convulse after midazolam received ketamine. We used propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression to determine if patients who received ketamine were more likely to stop convulsing prior to hospital arrival than those who received midazolam alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 479 (80.1%) of 598 actively convulsing patients who received 2 doses of midazolam (without subsequent ketamine) had resolution of their convulsions prior to hospital arrival compared with 85 (94.4%) of 90 who received ketamine after midazolam, an absolute difference between groups of 14.3% (95% CI 8.6% to 20.1%). After propensity matching, 82.0% of those in the midazolam only group had resolution of convulsions compared to 94.4% in the ketamine group, a difference of 12.4% (95% CI 3.1% to 21.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective study of out-of-hospital patients with active convulsive seizures, patients who received ketamine were more likely to have stopped convulsing prior to hospital arrival than those who received midazolam alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.11.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: To determine if ketamine, when added to midazolam for the treatment of out-of-hospital seizures, is associated with an increase in the rate of cessation of convulsions prior to hospital arrival.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of out-of-hospital patients with an active convulsive seizure being transported to a hospital by a large emergency medical services system in Florida, using data from August 1, 2015 and August 5, 2024. Per protocol, patients received midazolam first for their seizure. Starting in June 2017, a new protocol was developed in which patients who continued to convulse after midazolam received ketamine. We used propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression to determine if patients who received ketamine were more likely to stop convulsing prior to hospital arrival than those who received midazolam alone.

Results: Overall, 479 (80.1%) of 598 actively convulsing patients who received 2 doses of midazolam (without subsequent ketamine) had resolution of their convulsions prior to hospital arrival compared with 85 (94.4%) of 90 who received ketamine after midazolam, an absolute difference between groups of 14.3% (95% CI 8.6% to 20.1%). After propensity matching, 82.0% of those in the midazolam only group had resolution of convulsions compared to 94.4% in the ketamine group, a difference of 12.4% (95% CI 3.1% to 21.7%).

Conclusion: In this retrospective study of out-of-hospital patients with active convulsive seizures, patients who received ketamine were more likely to have stopped convulsing prior to hospital arrival than those who received midazolam alone.

研究目的确定在治疗院外癫痫发作时将氯胺酮添加到咪达唑仑中是否会增加患者在到达医院前停止抽搐的比率:我们利用 2015 年 8 月 1 日至 2024 年 8 月 5 日的数据,对佛罗里达州一家大型急救医疗服务系统送往医院的院外活动性惊厥发作患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。根据协议,患者发作时首先接受咪达唑仑治疗。从 2017 年 6 月开始,我们制定了一项新方案,让服用咪达唑仑后继续抽搐的患者接受氯胺酮治疗。我们使用倾向得分匹配和多变量逻辑回归来确定接受氯胺酮治疗的患者是否比仅接受咪达唑仑治疗的患者更有可能在到达医院前停止抽搐:总体而言,在 598 名接受 2 次咪达唑仑治疗(未随后使用氯胺酮)的活跃抽搐患者中,有 479 人(80.1%)在到达医院前停止了抽搐,而在接受咪达唑仑治疗后接受氯胺酮治疗的 90 人中,有 85 人(94.4%)停止了抽搐,组间绝对差异为 14.3%(95% CI 为 8.6% 至 20.1%)。经过倾向匹配后,仅接受咪达唑仑治疗组中有82.0%的患者惊厥得到缓解,而接受氯胺酮治疗组中有94.4%的患者惊厥得到缓解,两组之间的差异为12.4%(95% CI为3.1%至21.7%):在这项针对院外活动性惊厥发作患者的回顾性研究中,与仅接受咪达唑仑治疗的患者相比,接受氯胺酮治疗的患者更有可能在入院前停止抽搐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信