Metformin and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with gestational diabetes in the United Kingdom: A population-based cohort study.
Ya-Hui Yu, Robert W Platt, Pauline Reynier, Oriana H Y Yu, Kristian B Filion
{"title":"Metformin and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with gestational diabetes in the United Kingdom: A population-based cohort study.","authors":"Ya-Hui Yu, Robert W Platt, Pauline Reynier, Oriana H Y Yu, Kristian B Filion","doi":"10.1111/dom.16115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Metformin is increasingly used off-label as the treatment of gestational diabetes (GDM). Our objective was to determine if metformin versus insulin initiation is associated with the adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, its pregnancy register, and Hospital Episode Statistics from 1998 to 2018. We included pregnancies of women who initiated metformin or insulin between 20 weeks gestation and pregnancy end. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia. The secondary outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth, caesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (HDP). Inverse probability weighted-Cox proportional hazards models were to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), comparing those who initiated metformin versus insulin at cohort entry, accounting for baseline covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included pregnancies of 1297 women initiating metformin and of 895 women initiating insulin. Compared to insulin initiation, metformin initiation was associated with a decreased risk of LGA or macrosomia (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49, 0.78), Caesarean delivery (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69, 0.98), and preterm birth (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58, 1.08). The HRs for HDP and SGA were 0.92 (95% CI 0.57, 1.27) and 1.33 (95% CI 0.67, 2.00), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that, compared to initiating insulin, initiating metformin is associated with decreased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with GDM. These findings provide important real-world evidence regarding the use of metformin for GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"976-986"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Metformin is increasingly used off-label as the treatment of gestational diabetes (GDM). Our objective was to determine if metformin versus insulin initiation is associated with the adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, its pregnancy register, and Hospital Episode Statistics from 1998 to 2018. We included pregnancies of women who initiated metformin or insulin between 20 weeks gestation and pregnancy end. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia. The secondary outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth, caesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (HDP). Inverse probability weighted-Cox proportional hazards models were to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), comparing those who initiated metformin versus insulin at cohort entry, accounting for baseline covariates.
Results: Our cohort included pregnancies of 1297 women initiating metformin and of 895 women initiating insulin. Compared to insulin initiation, metformin initiation was associated with a decreased risk of LGA or macrosomia (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49, 0.78), Caesarean delivery (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69, 0.98), and preterm birth (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58, 1.08). The HRs for HDP and SGA were 0.92 (95% CI 0.57, 1.27) and 1.33 (95% CI 0.67, 2.00), respectively.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that, compared to initiating insulin, initiating metformin is associated with decreased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with GDM. These findings provide important real-world evidence regarding the use of metformin for GDM.
目的:二甲双胍越来越多地用于治疗妊娠糖尿病(GDM)。我们的目的是确定二甲双胍与胰岛素起始是否与不良妊娠结局相关。材料和方法:我们使用临床实践研究数据链、其妊娠登记和1998年至2018年的医院事件统计数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了在妊娠20周至妊娠结束期间开始使用二甲双胍或胰岛素的孕妇。主要结局是大胎龄(LGA)和巨大儿的复合结局。次要结局包括小胎龄(SGA)、早产、剖腹产和妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)。反概率加权cox比例风险模型用于估计校正风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(CI),比较在队列进入时开始使用二甲双胍和胰岛素的患者,并考虑基线协变量。结果:我们的队列包括1297名开始使用二甲双胍的孕妇和895名开始使用胰岛素的孕妇。与胰岛素起始治疗相比,二甲双胍起始治疗与LGA或巨大儿(HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49, 0.78)、剖腹产(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69, 0.98)和早产(HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58, 1.08)的风险降低相关。HDP和SGA的hr分别为0.92 (95% CI 0.57, 1.27)和1.33 (95% CI 0.67, 2.00)。结论:我们的研究表明,与开始使用胰岛素相比,开始使用二甲双胍与GDM妇女不良妊娠结局的风险降低有关。这些发现为使用二甲双胍治疗GDM提供了重要的现实证据。
期刊介绍:
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.