Improving diagnosis in patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome through the evaluation of non-criteria antibodies

IF 4.6 2区医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY

Clinical & Translational Immunology Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1002/cti2.70021

Daniel Álvarez, Hephzibah E Winter, Carlos J Velasquez Franco, Aleida Susana Castellanos Gutierrez, Núria Baños, Udo R Markert, Ángela P Cadavid, Diana M Morales-Prieto

{"title":"Improving diagnosis in patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome through the evaluation of non-criteria antibodies","authors":"Daniel Álvarez, Hephzibah E Winter, Carlos J Velasquez Franco, Aleida Susana Castellanos Gutierrez, Núria Baños, Udo R Markert, Ángela P Cadavid, Diana M Morales-Prieto","doi":"10.1002/cti2.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease driven by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Currently, APS diagnosis requires a combination of clinical manifestations (thrombosis and/or obstetric morbidity) and the persistent presence of at least one criteria aPL: anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) or lupus anticoagulant (LA). Patients with suggestive obstetric symptoms but lacking criteria aPL face diagnostic challenges. Non-criteria aPL screening may enhance discrimination. This study proposes a classification incorporating both criteria and non-criteria antibodies to improve obstetric APS diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Blood samples from non-pregnant women (<i>n</i> = 68) with a history of vascular, obstetric, or vascular and obstetric manifestations were analysed. Among them, 30 had previous diagnosis of APS. Healthy women with proven gestational success were included as controls (<i>n</i> = 16). Criteria and non-criteria (anti-phosphatidylglycerol, anti-phosphatidylethanolamine, anti-phosphatidylinositol, anti-phosphatidylserine and anti-phosphatidic acid) IgG aPL were evaluated by ELISA and coagulation tests. Based on the resulting aPL profile, patients were reclassified. Responsiveness to treatment was obtained from medical records.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Criteria aPL levels marginally differentiated women previously managed as obstetric APS from unexplained/other causes of obstetric morbidity. Including non-criteria aPL improved separation. The proposed classification identified an obstetric APS group that exhibits non-criteria aPL and aβ2GPI titres below the cut-off but higher than healthy women (7.88 vs. 2.47 SGU, <i>P</i> = 0.006). Compared to cases of other causes of obstetric morbidity, these patients retrospectively responded better to aspirin and/or heparin treatment (71.43% vs. 11.11%, <i>P</i> = 0.035).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Assessing non-criteria antibodies may identify isolated obstetric APS cases benefiting from established therapies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":152,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Immunology","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cti2.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease driven by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Currently, APS diagnosis requires a combination of clinical manifestations (thrombosis and/or obstetric morbidity) and the persistent presence of at least one criteria aPL: anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) or lupus anticoagulant (LA). Patients with suggestive obstetric symptoms but lacking criteria aPL face diagnostic challenges. Non-criteria aPL screening may enhance discrimination. This study proposes a classification incorporating both criteria and non-criteria antibodies to improve obstetric APS diagnosis.

Methods

Blood samples from non-pregnant women (n = 68) with a history of vascular, obstetric, or vascular and obstetric manifestations were analysed. Among them, 30 had previous diagnosis of APS. Healthy women with proven gestational success were included as controls (n = 16). Criteria and non-criteria (anti-phosphatidylglycerol, anti-phosphatidylethanolamine, anti-phosphatidylinositol, anti-phosphatidylserine and anti-phosphatidic acid) IgG aPL were evaluated by ELISA and coagulation tests. Based on the resulting aPL profile, patients were reclassified. Responsiveness to treatment was obtained from medical records.

Results

Criteria aPL levels marginally differentiated women previously managed as obstetric APS from unexplained/other causes of obstetric morbidity. Including non-criteria aPL improved separation. The proposed classification identified an obstetric APS group that exhibits non-criteria aPL and aβ2GPI titres below the cut-off but higher than healthy women (7.88 vs. 2.47 SGU, P = 0.006). Compared to cases of other causes of obstetric morbidity, these patients retrospectively responded better to aspirin and/or heparin treatment (71.43% vs. 11.11%, P = 0.035).

Conclusions

Assessing non-criteria antibodies may identify isolated obstetric APS cases benefiting from established therapies.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical & Translational Immunology Medicine-Immunology and Allergy

CiteScore

12.00

自引率

1.70%

发文量

审稿时长

13 weeks

期刊介绍： Clinical & Translational Immunology is an open access, fully peer-reviewed journal devoted to publishing cutting-edge advances in biomedical research for scientists and physicians. The Journal covers fields including cancer biology, cardiovascular research, gene therapy, immunology, vaccine development and disease pathogenesis and therapy at the earliest phases of investigation.