Days at home after surgery as a perioperative outcome: scoping review and recommendations for use in health services research.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Tiago Ribeiro, Armaan K Malhotra, Adom Bondzi-Simpson, Antoine Eskander, Negar Ahmadi, Frances C Wright, Daniel I McIsaac, Alyson Mahar, Angela Jerath, Natalie Coburn, Julie Hallet
{"title":"Days at home after surgery as a perioperative outcome: scoping review and recommendations for use in health services research.","authors":"Tiago Ribeiro, Armaan K Malhotra, Adom Bondzi-Simpson, Antoine Eskander, Negar Ahmadi, Frances C Wright, Daniel I McIsaac, Alyson Mahar, Angela Jerath, Natalie Coburn, Julie Hallet","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znae278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Days at home after surgery is a promising new patient-centred outcome metric that measures time spent outside of healthcare institutions and mortality. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the use of days at home in perioperative research and evaluate how it has been termed, defined, and validated, with a view to inform future use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was run on MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 30 March 2023 to capture all perioperative research where days at home or equivalent was measured. Days at home was defined as any outcome where time spent outside of hospitals and/or healthcare institutions was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 articles were included. Days at home has been increasingly used, with most studies published in 2022 (35, 45%). Days at home has been applied in multiple study design types, with varying terminology applied. There is variability in how days at home has been defined, with variation in measures of healthcare utilization incorporated across studies. Poor reporting was noted, with 14 studies (18%) not defining how days at home was operationalized and 18 studies (23%) not reporting how death was handled. Construct and criterion validity were demonstrated across seven validation studies in different surgical populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Days at home after surgery is a robust, flexible, and validated outcome measure that is being increasingly used as a patient-centred metric after surgery. With growing use, there is also growing variability in terms used, definitions applied, and reporting standards. This review summarizes these findings to work towards coordinating and standardizing the use of days at home after surgery as a patient-centred policy and research tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"111 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae278","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Days at home after surgery is a promising new patient-centred outcome metric that measures time spent outside of healthcare institutions and mortality. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the use of days at home in perioperative research and evaluate how it has been termed, defined, and validated, with a view to inform future use.

Methods: The search was run on MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 30 March 2023 to capture all perioperative research where days at home or equivalent was measured. Days at home was defined as any outcome where time spent outside of hospitals and/or healthcare institutions was calculated.

Results: A total of 78 articles were included. Days at home has been increasingly used, with most studies published in 2022 (35, 45%). Days at home has been applied in multiple study design types, with varying terminology applied. There is variability in how days at home has been defined, with variation in measures of healthcare utilization incorporated across studies. Poor reporting was noted, with 14 studies (18%) not defining how days at home was operationalized and 18 studies (23%) not reporting how death was handled. Construct and criterion validity were demonstrated across seven validation studies in different surgical populations.

Conclusion: Days at home after surgery is a robust, flexible, and validated outcome measure that is being increasingly used as a patient-centred metric after surgery. With growing use, there is also growing variability in terms used, definitions applied, and reporting standards. This review summarizes these findings to work towards coordinating and standardizing the use of days at home after surgery as a patient-centred policy and research tool.

作为围手术期结果的术后在家天数:范围综述和用于医疗服务研究的建议。
背景:手术后在家的天数是一个很有希望的以患者为中心的新结果指标,它可以衡量在医疗机构外度过的时间和死亡率。本综述的目的是综合围手术期研究中在家天数的使用,并评估其如何被命名、定义和验证,以期为未来的使用提供信息。方法:检索于2023年3月30日在MEDLINE、Embase和Scopus上运行,以捕获所有测量在家或同等时间的围手术期研究。在家天数定义为计算在医院和/或医疗机构以外度过的时间的任何结果。结果:共纳入文献78篇。在家的日子越来越多,大多数研究发表于2022年(35.45%)。在家天数已应用于多种研究设计类型,使用不同的术语。在如何定义在家天数方面存在差异,不同研究纳入了医疗保健利用措施的差异。注意到报告不足,14项研究(18%)没有定义如何操作在家天数,18项研究(23%)没有报告如何处理死亡。在不同的手术人群中进行了七项验证研究,证明了结构和标准的有效性。结论:术后居家天数是一种可靠、灵活、有效的结果衡量指标,越来越多地被用作术后以患者为中心的衡量指标。随着使用的增加,在使用的术语、应用的定义和报告标准方面也存在越来越大的可变性。本综述总结了这些发现,以协调和标准化手术后居家天数作为以患者为中心的政策和研究工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信