Stem subsidence in total hip arthroplasty: retrospective investigation of a short stem using a simple measurement approach

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicolas Horst, Christoph Theil, Georg Gosheger, Tobias Kalisch, Burkhard Moellenbeck
{"title":"Stem subsidence in total hip arthroplasty: retrospective investigation of a short stem using a simple measurement approach","authors":"Nicolas Horst,&nbsp;Christoph Theil,&nbsp;Georg Gosheger,&nbsp;Tobias Kalisch,&nbsp;Burkhard Moellenbeck","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05642-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful treatment for advanced hip joint diseases. More recently, short stems became increasingly popular, but stem subsidence remains a concern. This study investigates early short stem subsidence in a large patient cohort using a simple measurement approach for everyday practice.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective, single center, single implant design study included 1000 patients with primary THA. Subsidence was evaluated using standardized weight-bearing radiographs taken 3–5 days and 2–3 weeks postoperatively with full weight-bearing (FWB). A novel Subsidence Index (SID) was introduced to quantify stem subsidence in a simple and reproducible manner. The SID is calculated by averaging four distinct linear measurements between defined anatomical landmarks on the femur and the implant, captured on standard radiographs without additional software.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of all analyzed patients 6% (60/1000) had subsidence of more than 3 mm. The mean subsidence was 1.3 mm (range, 0 to 16.25 mm).</p><p>There were 0.6% (6) who underwent stem revision for symptomatic subsidence. Men and obese patients had greater subsidence. However, patient age, BMI, stems without lateral bone contact and other demographic factors were not associated with subsidence.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early subsidence is relatively frequent with this uncemented short stem, however revisions are rare. Patients with risk factors should be counseled regarding FWB and radiographic controls should be performed. The SID provides an easy, non-invasive and inexpensive tool for early subsidence assessment; however, its simplicity limits its accuracy. Further research is needed in comparison to more elaborate methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05642-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05642-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful treatment for advanced hip joint diseases. More recently, short stems became increasingly popular, but stem subsidence remains a concern. This study investigates early short stem subsidence in a large patient cohort using a simple measurement approach for everyday practice.

Methods

This retrospective, single center, single implant design study included 1000 patients with primary THA. Subsidence was evaluated using standardized weight-bearing radiographs taken 3–5 days and 2–3 weeks postoperatively with full weight-bearing (FWB). A novel Subsidence Index (SID) was introduced to quantify stem subsidence in a simple and reproducible manner. The SID is calculated by averaging four distinct linear measurements between defined anatomical landmarks on the femur and the implant, captured on standard radiographs without additional software.

Results

Out of all analyzed patients 6% (60/1000) had subsidence of more than 3 mm. The mean subsidence was 1.3 mm (range, 0 to 16.25 mm).

There were 0.6% (6) who underwent stem revision for symptomatic subsidence. Men and obese patients had greater subsidence. However, patient age, BMI, stems without lateral bone contact and other demographic factors were not associated with subsidence.

Conclusion

Early subsidence is relatively frequent with this uncemented short stem, however revisions are rare. Patients with risk factors should be counseled regarding FWB and radiographic controls should be performed. The SID provides an easy, non-invasive and inexpensive tool for early subsidence assessment; however, its simplicity limits its accuracy. Further research is needed in comparison to more elaborate methods.

全髋关节置换术中的柄下沉:使用简单测量方法对短柄进行回顾性调查
背景无柄全髋关节置换术(THA)是治疗晚期髋关节疾病的一种成功方法。最近,短茎越来越受欢迎,但茎下沉仍是一个令人担忧的问题。本研究采用日常实践中的简单测量方法,调查了大量患者群中的早期短柄下沉情况。方法这项回顾性、单中心、单植入物设计的研究纳入了1000名初级THA患者。采用术后3-5天和2-3周完全负重(FWB)时拍摄的标准化负重X光片对下沉情况进行评估。引入了一种新的下沉指数(SID),以简单、可重复的方式量化骨干下沉。SID的计算方法是,将标准X光片上捕捉到的股骨和植入物上明确解剖标志之间的四个不同线性测量值取平均值,而无需额外软件。平均下沉1.3毫米(范围0至16.25毫米)。0.6%的患者(6人)因出现症状性下沉而进行了柄翻修。男性和肥胖患者的下陷程度更大。然而,患者年龄、体重指数、无侧向骨接触的柄和其他人口统计学因素与下沉无关。对于有风险因素的患者,应提供有关FWB的咨询,并进行放射学控制。SID为早期下沉评估提供了一种简便、无创和廉价的工具;然而,它的简便性限制了其准确性。与更复杂的方法相比,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信