Rethinking household food security under a changing climate in drought prone areas of Ethiopia

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso, Aseres Mamo Eshetie, Eunice Matafwali, Asma Akter, Hua Lu, Xianhui Geng
{"title":"Rethinking household food security under a changing climate in drought prone areas of Ethiopia","authors":"Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso, Aseres Mamo Eshetie, Eunice Matafwali, Asma Akter, Hua Lu, Xianhui Geng","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) is a strategic approach that can mitigate the impacts of climate change on food and nutrition security (FNS). Despite extensive research on this intersection, CSA adoption is often treated as a single, aggregate variable, which may obscure nuanced realities and choices that farmers confront. Additionally, empirical evidence linking CSA adoption to FNS remains limited in drought-prone areas, which face unique challenges such as degraded soils. This study addresses these gaps by using cross-sectional data from 909 farmers in Ethiopia to examine the factors influencing CSA adoption and its impact on FNS, while controlling for placement endogeneity. Applying multivariate probit and endogenous switching regression (ESR) models, we account for selection bias and endogenous covariates. Results show that 84 % of sampled households adopt at least one CSA practice, and CSA adopters generally exhibit higher household dietary diversity scores than non-adopters. Specifically, households implementing soil fertility practices consume an average of four additional food groups daily, while those adopting combinations of yield-boosting and soil fertility practices or yield-boosting and soil erosion control practices consume approximately three additional food groups. In a similar trend, households adopting both soil fertility and erosion control practices have a moderately enhanced diet, consuming two more food groups than their counterparts. Notably, increased crop income emerges as the compelling pathway linking CSA adoption with improved FNS outcomes. In light of the challenges posed by degraded soils and recurrent food insecurity in drought-prone areas, this study underscores the need to support CSA adoption through enhanced access to information, training, infrastructure, and credit, fostering more resilient agricultural systems and sustainable land use.","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107437","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) is a strategic approach that can mitigate the impacts of climate change on food and nutrition security (FNS). Despite extensive research on this intersection, CSA adoption is often treated as a single, aggregate variable, which may obscure nuanced realities and choices that farmers confront. Additionally, empirical evidence linking CSA adoption to FNS remains limited in drought-prone areas, which face unique challenges such as degraded soils. This study addresses these gaps by using cross-sectional data from 909 farmers in Ethiopia to examine the factors influencing CSA adoption and its impact on FNS, while controlling for placement endogeneity. Applying multivariate probit and endogenous switching regression (ESR) models, we account for selection bias and endogenous covariates. Results show that 84 % of sampled households adopt at least one CSA practice, and CSA adopters generally exhibit higher household dietary diversity scores than non-adopters. Specifically, households implementing soil fertility practices consume an average of four additional food groups daily, while those adopting combinations of yield-boosting and soil fertility practices or yield-boosting and soil erosion control practices consume approximately three additional food groups. In a similar trend, households adopting both soil fertility and erosion control practices have a moderately enhanced diet, consuming two more food groups than their counterparts. Notably, increased crop income emerges as the compelling pathway linking CSA adoption with improved FNS outcomes. In light of the challenges posed by degraded soils and recurrent food insecurity in drought-prone areas, this study underscores the need to support CSA adoption through enhanced access to information, training, infrastructure, and credit, fostering more resilient agricultural systems and sustainable land use.
重新思考埃塞俄比亚干旱易发地区不断变化的气候条件下的家庭粮食安全问题
气候智能型农业(CSA)是一种战略方法,可以减轻气候变化对粮食和营养安全(FNS)的影响。尽管对这一交叉问题进行了广泛研究,但 CSA 的采用往往被视为一个单一、综合的变量,这可能会掩盖农民所面临的细微现实和选择。此外,在面临退化土壤等独特挑战的干旱多发地区,将采用 CSA 与 FNS 联系起来的经验证据仍然有限。本研究利用来自埃塞俄比亚 909 位农民的横截面数据,研究了采用 CSA 的影响因素及其对 FNS 的影响,同时控制了安置的内生性,从而弥补了这些不足。我们采用多变量 probit 和内生转换回归 (ESR) 模型,考虑了选择偏差和内生协变量。结果显示,84% 的抽样家庭采用了至少一种 CSA 方法,采用 CSA 方法的家庭的膳食多样性得分普遍高于未采用 CSA 方法的家庭。具体而言,采用土壤肥力措施的家庭平均每天多摄入四类食物,而采用增产和土壤肥力措施组合或增产和土壤侵蚀控制措施的家庭则多摄入约三类食物。与此趋势类似,同时采用土壤肥力和水土流失控制两种方法的家庭的饮食也得到了适度改善,比其他家庭多摄入两类食物。值得注意的是,作物收入的增加是将采用 CSA 与改善 FNS 结果联系起来的重要途径。鉴于土壤退化和干旱多发地区经常出现的粮食不安全所带来的挑战,本研究强调有必要通过加强信息、培训、基础设施和信贷的获取来支持 CSA 的采用,从而促进更具弹性的农业系统和土地的可持续利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信