An approach for predicting landslide susceptibility and evaluating predisposing factors

IF 7.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Wanxin Guo, Jian Ye, Chengbing Liu, Yijie Lv, Qiuyu Zeng, Xin Huang
{"title":"An approach for predicting landslide susceptibility and evaluating predisposing factors","authors":"Wanxin Guo, Jian Ye, Chengbing Liu, Yijie Lv, Qiuyu Zeng, Xin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2024.104217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effectively leveraging landslide spatial location information is crucial for improving the accuracy of deep learning in predicting landslide susceptibility and exploring the impacts of predisposing factors. Current single deep learning models for landslide susceptibility assessment require enhancements in both prediction accuracy and robustness. Inclusion of non-interrelated positional information among samples leads to reduced prediction accuracy and challenges in quantifying landslide risk covariates. This study proposes a landslide susceptibility assessment method that integrates ensemble learning with geographically weighted concepts. Using a stacking method, a 1D convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), a recurrent neural network (RNN), and a long short-term memory (LSTM) network were combined to form the CRNN-LSTM ensemble model. Additionally, we constructed a deep learning geographically weighted regression (GW-DNN) model based on the deep learning principles and geographically weighted regression to quantify the impacts of landslide-predisposing factors.The experimental results show that the CRNN-LSTM model achieved AUC values of 0.977 and 0.961 on the training and validation sets, significantly outperforming the individual classifiers (AUC of 0.944 and 0.940 for the 1D-CNN model, 0.950 and 0.948 for the RNN model, and 0.956 and 0.952 for the LSTM model). Additionally, the GW-DNN model achieved R<ce:sup loc=\"post\">2</ce:sup> coefficients of 0.876 and 0.860 during the training and validation phases. These findings indicate that our proposed method not only highly accurately predicts landslide susceptibility but also provides a precise quantitative assessment of the impact of landslide-predisposing factors at specific spatial points (landslide units) in high-risk areas. These findings offer valuable technical support for landslide disaster prevention and mitigation.","PeriodicalId":50341,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effectively leveraging landslide spatial location information is crucial for improving the accuracy of deep learning in predicting landslide susceptibility and exploring the impacts of predisposing factors. Current single deep learning models for landslide susceptibility assessment require enhancements in both prediction accuracy and robustness. Inclusion of non-interrelated positional information among samples leads to reduced prediction accuracy and challenges in quantifying landslide risk covariates. This study proposes a landslide susceptibility assessment method that integrates ensemble learning with geographically weighted concepts. Using a stacking method, a 1D convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), a recurrent neural network (RNN), and a long short-term memory (LSTM) network were combined to form the CRNN-LSTM ensemble model. Additionally, we constructed a deep learning geographically weighted regression (GW-DNN) model based on the deep learning principles and geographically weighted regression to quantify the impacts of landslide-predisposing factors.The experimental results show that the CRNN-LSTM model achieved AUC values of 0.977 and 0.961 on the training and validation sets, significantly outperforming the individual classifiers (AUC of 0.944 and 0.940 for the 1D-CNN model, 0.950 and 0.948 for the RNN model, and 0.956 and 0.952 for the LSTM model). Additionally, the GW-DNN model achieved R2 coefficients of 0.876 and 0.860 during the training and validation phases. These findings indicate that our proposed method not only highly accurately predicts landslide susceptibility but also provides a precise quantitative assessment of the impact of landslide-predisposing factors at specific spatial points (landslide units) in high-risk areas. These findings offer valuable technical support for landslide disaster prevention and mitigation.
预测山体滑坡易发性和评估易发因素的方法
有效利用滑坡空间位置信息对于提高深度学习在预测滑坡易发性和探索易发因素影响方面的准确性至关重要。目前用于滑坡易发性评估的单一深度学习模型需要提高预测精度和鲁棒性。在样本中加入非相互关联的位置信息会导致预测精度降低,并给量化滑坡风险协变量带来挑战。本研究提出了一种将集合学习与地理加权概念相结合的滑坡易感性评估方法。利用堆叠方法,将一维卷积神经网络(1D-CNN)、递归神经网络(RNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)网络结合起来,形成 CRNN-LSTM 集合模型。此外,我们还基于深度学习原理和地理加权回归,构建了深度学习地理加权回归(GW-DNN)模型,以量化滑坡诱发因素的影响。实验结果表明,CRNN-LSTM 模型在训练集和验证集上的 AUC 值分别为 0.977 和 0.961,显著优于单个分类器(1D-CNN 模型的 AUC 值分别为 0.944 和 0.940,RNN 模型的 AUC 值分别为 0.950 和 0.948,LSTM 模型的 AUC 值分别为 0.956 和 0.952)。此外,在训练和验证阶段,GW-DNN 模型的 R2 系数分别为 0.876 和 0.860。这些结果表明,我们提出的方法不仅能高度准确地预测滑坡易发性,还能对高风险地区特定空间点(滑坡单元)的滑坡易发因素的影响进行精确的定量评估。这些研究成果为滑坡防灾减灾提供了宝贵的技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
7.2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信