Information sharing across competing platforms with varying information capabilities

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Haoruo Zhu , Yaodong Ni , Yongbo Xiao
{"title":"Information sharing across competing platforms with varying information capabilities","authors":"Haoruo Zhu ,&nbsp;Yaodong Ni ,&nbsp;Yongbo Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Competing online retail platforms frequently function as both agency and reselling channels. This paper explores a manufacturer’s channel selection strategy in the context of downstream platform competition and information sharing, taking into account the platforms’ varying levels of information capability. Our research indicates that the manufacturer opts for a hybrid channel approach. Competing platforms aim to be selected as agency channels by offering information sharing and reduced commission fees. Interestingly, the manufacturer chooses the platform with lesser information capability as her agency channel to gain access to shared demand data, while opting for the platform with greater capability as reselling channel without accessing his demand data. The platform with inferior information capability is more inclined to establish a revenue-sharing partnership with the manufacturer to mitigate risks, leading him to decrease his commission rate to attract the manufacturer to select him as the agency channel. We demonstrate that, under conditions of demand uncertainty, a significant distinction between agency and reselling channels lies in the distribution of risk, i.e., whether the platform assumes the risk alone or shares it with the manufacturer. Furthermore, we highlight the <em>free-ride effect</em>, wherein an agency platform can benefit from his rival’s superior information capability. As a result, a complex relationship, characterized by both cooperation and rivalry, may develop between the two platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":"323 1","pages":"Pages 125-138"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724009391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Competing online retail platforms frequently function as both agency and reselling channels. This paper explores a manufacturer’s channel selection strategy in the context of downstream platform competition and information sharing, taking into account the platforms’ varying levels of information capability. Our research indicates that the manufacturer opts for a hybrid channel approach. Competing platforms aim to be selected as agency channels by offering information sharing and reduced commission fees. Interestingly, the manufacturer chooses the platform with lesser information capability as her agency channel to gain access to shared demand data, while opting for the platform with greater capability as reselling channel without accessing his demand data. The platform with inferior information capability is more inclined to establish a revenue-sharing partnership with the manufacturer to mitigate risks, leading him to decrease his commission rate to attract the manufacturer to select him as the agency channel. We demonstrate that, under conditions of demand uncertainty, a significant distinction between agency and reselling channels lies in the distribution of risk, i.e., whether the platform assumes the risk alone or shares it with the manufacturer. Furthermore, we highlight the free-ride effect, wherein an agency platform can benefit from his rival’s superior information capability. As a result, a complex relationship, characterized by both cooperation and rivalry, may develop between the two platforms.
具有不同信息功能的竞争平台之间的信息共享
相互竞争的在线零售平台经常同时扮演代理和转售渠道的角色。本文探讨了在下游平台竞争和信息共享的背景下,考虑不同平台信息能力水平的制造商渠道选择策略。我们的研究表明,制造商选择混合渠道的方法。竞争平台的目标是通过提供信息共享和降低佣金来选择代理渠道。有趣的是,制造商选择信息能力较弱的平台作为其代理渠道,以获得共享的需求数据,而选择能力较强的平台作为转售渠道,但无法访问其需求数据。信息能力较差的平台更倾向于与制造商建立收益共享伙伴关系以降低风险,导致其降低佣金率以吸引制造商选择其作为代理渠道。我们证明,在需求不确定的条件下,代理渠道和转售渠道之间的显著区别在于风险的分配,即是平台单独承担风险还是与制造商共同承担风险。此外,我们还强调了搭便车效应,即代理平台可以从竞争对手的优势信息能力中获益。因此,这两个平台之间可能会发展出一种既合作又竞争的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Operational Research
European Journal of Operational Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
786
审稿时长
8.2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信