Second-line therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab: multicenter single institution cohort experience.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae342
Paulina Marell, Ioannis Kournoutas, Jennifer Gile, Anina Peersen, Priyanshi Shah, Hani Babiker, Lionel Fonkoua Kankeu, Leslie Washburn, Rondell Graham, Mark Truty, Patrick Starlinger, Thorvardur Halfdanarson, Zhaohui Jin, Aminah Jatoi, Robert McWilliams, Mitesh Borad, Tanios S Bekaii-Saab, Amit Mahipal, Fang-Shu Ou, Nguyen H Tran
{"title":"Second-line therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab: multicenter single institution cohort experience.","authors":"Paulina Marell, Ioannis Kournoutas, Jennifer Gile, Anina Peersen, Priyanshi Shah, Hani Babiker, Lionel Fonkoua Kankeu, Leslie Washburn, Rondell Graham, Mark Truty, Patrick Starlinger, Thorvardur Halfdanarson, Zhaohui Jin, Aminah Jatoi, Robert McWilliams, Mitesh Borad, Tanios S Bekaii-Saab, Amit Mahipal, Fang-Shu Ou, Nguyen H Tran","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B.

Patients and methods: We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy.

Results: Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival.

Conclusion: Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.

阿特珠单抗和贝伐珠单抗一线治疗后的晚期肝细胞癌二线治疗:多中心单机构队列经验。
背景:Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (A/B)于2020年获得FDA批准,作为晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的一线治疗药物。然而,最佳的后续治疗方案尚不清楚。在这里,我们描述了晚期HCC患者接受一线A/B治疗后的临床结果。患者和方法:我们对2018年1月至2022年12月在梅奥诊所接受一线a /B治疗的HCC患者进行了多点分析。该研究队列包括所有接受A/B后二线全身治疗的患者。中位总生存期(OS)和治疗停止时间(TTD)采用Kaplan-Meier法估计。儿童Pugh (CP)评分也在诊断时、一线治疗前和二线治疗前进行描述。结果:在342例接受A/B治疗的患者中,107例(31.3%)接受了包括抗vegf治疗或免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)在内的二线治疗,并被纳入最终分析。从二线治疗开始,所有患者的中位OS为11.1个月。接受抗vegf抑制剂和ICI治疗的患者中位生存期分别为10.7个月(95%CI: 7.2-12.8)和15.7个月(95%CI: 6.8-NE) (P = 0.50)。抗vegf抑制剂和ICI二线治疗的中位TTD分别为2.4个月(95% CI: 1.7-3.3)和2.6个月(95% CI: 1.5-5.1) (P = 0.87)。在多变量分析中,CP与生存率显著相关。结论:一线A/B治疗后,ICI与抗vegf治疗的生存率无统计学差异,停药时间也无统计学差异。CP评分仍然是一个重要的预后工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信