Longitudinal Stability and Predictive Value of Socio/Emotional/Behavioral Screening in an Outpatient Pediatric Network.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
R Christopher Sheldrick, Justin Birudavol, Dina R Hirshfeld-Becker, Alice S Carter, Ellen C Perrin, Anamika Dutta, Talia S Benheim, Juliana M Holcomb Scarpelli, Alexy Arauz Boudreau, Michael S Jellinek, J Michael Murphy
{"title":"Longitudinal Stability and Predictive Value of Socio/Emotional/Behavioral Screening in an Outpatient Pediatric Network.","authors":"R Christopher Sheldrick, Justin Birudavol, Dina R Hirshfeld-Becker, Alice S Carter, Ellen C Perrin, Anamika Dutta, Talia S Benheim, Juliana M Holcomb Scarpelli, Alexy Arauz Boudreau, Michael S Jellinek, J Michael Murphy","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2022, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended annual social/emotional/behavioral (SEB) screening at preventive pediatric visits. Numerous SEB screeners have considerable empirical support for children of all ages. However, few studies inform the longitudinal use of SEB screeners in pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using electronic health records (EHR) from seven pediatric clinics in a large hospital system, we analyze the longitudinal stability of three SEB screeners among 9153 children and adolescents who were screened multiple times over a 3-year period, and we evaluate associations with International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes for SEB diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate stability was documented for the Baby Pediatric Symptom Checklist (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.57), Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist (ICC=.60), and Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (ICC=.69). Stability of positive/negative results was sensitive to each screener's threshold. Across a range of thresholds that classify 7-20% of children as positive, all three screeners achieved positive predictive values (PPVs) of approximately 40-65% and diagnostic odds ratios ranging from 8 to 15. These findings compare favorably to published results for longer measures and structured interviews. Recommended thresholds varied markedly across screeners, and associations with ICD codes demonstrate that higher thresholds yield higher specificity but lower sensitivity (ie, a majority of ICD codes are not anticipated by positive screens).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three common SEB screeners display longitudinal stability similar to longer, more established measures. Results demonstrate that recommended thresholds vary markedly across measures and that choice of threshold strongly influences sensitivity and specificity, underscoring the need for greater attention to selection of thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2022, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended annual social/emotional/behavioral (SEB) screening at preventive pediatric visits. Numerous SEB screeners have considerable empirical support for children of all ages. However, few studies inform the longitudinal use of SEB screeners in pediatrics.

Methods: Using electronic health records (EHR) from seven pediatric clinics in a large hospital system, we analyze the longitudinal stability of three SEB screeners among 9153 children and adolescents who were screened multiple times over a 3-year period, and we evaluate associations with International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes for SEB diagnoses.

Results: Moderate stability was documented for the Baby Pediatric Symptom Checklist (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.57), Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist (ICC=.60), and Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (ICC=.69). Stability of positive/negative results was sensitive to each screener's threshold. Across a range of thresholds that classify 7-20% of children as positive, all three screeners achieved positive predictive values (PPVs) of approximately 40-65% and diagnostic odds ratios ranging from 8 to 15. These findings compare favorably to published results for longer measures and structured interviews. Recommended thresholds varied markedly across screeners, and associations with ICD codes demonstrate that higher thresholds yield higher specificity but lower sensitivity (ie, a majority of ICD codes are not anticipated by positive screens).

Conclusions: Three common SEB screeners display longitudinal stability similar to longer, more established measures. Results demonstrate that recommended thresholds vary markedly across measures and that choice of threshold strongly influences sensitivity and specificity, underscoring the need for greater attention to selection of thresholds.

儿科门诊网络中社会/情感/行为筛查的纵向稳定性和预测价值。
背景:2022年,美国儿科学会建议在儿科预防性就诊时进行年度社会/情感/行为(SEB)筛查。许多SEB筛选者对所有年龄段的儿童都有相当大的经验支持。然而,很少有研究告知SEB筛查在儿科的纵向使用。方法:使用大型医院系统中7个儿科诊所的电子健康记录(EHR),我们分析了9153名儿童和青少年在3年内多次筛查的三名SEB筛查者的纵向稳定性,并评估了SEB诊断与国际疾病分类(ICD)代码的相关性。结果:婴儿儿科症状检查表(ICC = 0.57)、学龄前儿童症状检查表(ICC = 0.60)和儿科症状检查表-17 (ICC = 0.69)均有中度稳定性。阳性/阴性结果的稳定性对每个筛选者的阈值敏感。在将7-20%的儿童分类为阳性的阈值范围内,所有三种筛查方法的阳性预测值(ppv)均达到约40-65%,诊断优势比为8 - 15。这些发现与长期测量和结构化访谈的公布结果相比是有利的。不同筛查者推荐的阈值差异显著,与ICD编码的关联表明,更高的阈值产生更高的特异性,但更低的敏感性(即,大多数ICD编码不是阳性筛查所预期的)。结论:三种常见的SEB筛查显示纵向稳定性类似于更长,更成熟的措施。结果表明,推荐的阈值在不同的测量方法中差异很大,阈值的选择强烈影响敏感性和特异性,强调需要更多地注意阈值的选择。临床试验注册(如有):无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信