Efficacy of CycloMesh™+Ropivacaine in the treatment of uncomplicated inguinal hernia after the Lichtenstein procedure: Results of a prospective multicentric double-blind study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frank-Olivier Breleur, Haitham Khalil, André Dabrowski, Francois Mauvais, Phiphia Pipia, Mathieu Messager, Mégane Homa, Jean-Marc Regimbeau
{"title":"Efficacy of CycloMesh™+Ropivacaine in the treatment of uncomplicated inguinal hernia after the Lichtenstein procedure: Results of a prospective multicentric double-blind study.","authors":"Frank-Olivier Breleur, Haitham Khalil, André Dabrowski, Francois Mauvais, Phiphia Pipia, Mathieu Messager, Mégane Homa, Jean-Marc Regimbeau","doi":"10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Twenty to 30% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery (20 million patients per year worldwide) present early postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to assess the interest of a mesh (CycloMesh™, Cousin Biotech) soaked with ropivacaine for managing early postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a randomized, phase III, comparative superiority, double-blind, international multicenter study. From October 2019 to February 2022, 290 patients underwent surgery for uncomplicated inguinal hernia, under general anesthesia, using the Liechtenstein technique. Each patient was randomly assigned to either the experimental group (mesh soaked in ropivacaine hydrochloride 10mg/mL) or the control group (mesh soaked in physiological saline solution). The primary endpoint was the pain at cough assessment with the visual analogue scale (VAS) at H6 after the surgery. The secondary endpoints were the global pain assessment at H2, H4, H6, day 1, day 2, day 3, day 7, 1month, 1year, and 2years after the surgery, assessment of antalgic consumption, description of the surgical procedure and postoperative complications rate, hospitalization and post-hospital discharge data (number of conversions from outpatient to inpatient care), and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 290 patients included in the study, 150 and 140 patients were in the experimental or control group respectively. The per-protocol (PP) population (240 patients) comprised 125 patients in the ropivacaine group and 115 in the control group. The mesh soaking solution had no significant effect on the pain at cough at H6, either in the intention-to-treat population (3.3 vs 3.2, P=0.12) or in the PP population (3.3 vs 3.7, P=0.15). The ropivacaine-soaked prosthesis resulted in a reduction in overall pain at H2 (2.3 vs 3.2, P<0.0001), H4 (2.3 vs 3.1, P<0.0001) and H6 (2.3 vs 2.7, P=0.0039). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of antalgic consumption, postoperative complications, or the number of ambulatory conversions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The placement of CycloMesh™ soaked with ropivacaine did not reduce the pain at cough at H6 but did reduce overall pain in the first 6hours after surgery and could simplify patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.11.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Twenty to 30% of patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery (20 million patients per year worldwide) present early postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to assess the interest of a mesh (CycloMesh™, Cousin Biotech) soaked with ropivacaine for managing early postoperative pain.

Materials and methods: This was a randomized, phase III, comparative superiority, double-blind, international multicenter study. From October 2019 to February 2022, 290 patients underwent surgery for uncomplicated inguinal hernia, under general anesthesia, using the Liechtenstein technique. Each patient was randomly assigned to either the experimental group (mesh soaked in ropivacaine hydrochloride 10mg/mL) or the control group (mesh soaked in physiological saline solution). The primary endpoint was the pain at cough assessment with the visual analogue scale (VAS) at H6 after the surgery. The secondary endpoints were the global pain assessment at H2, H4, H6, day 1, day 2, day 3, day 7, 1month, 1year, and 2years after the surgery, assessment of antalgic consumption, description of the surgical procedure and postoperative complications rate, hospitalization and post-hospital discharge data (number of conversions from outpatient to inpatient care), and recurrence.

Results: Of the 290 patients included in the study, 150 and 140 patients were in the experimental or control group respectively. The per-protocol (PP) population (240 patients) comprised 125 patients in the ropivacaine group and 115 in the control group. The mesh soaking solution had no significant effect on the pain at cough at H6, either in the intention-to-treat population (3.3 vs 3.2, P=0.12) or in the PP population (3.3 vs 3.7, P=0.15). The ropivacaine-soaked prosthesis resulted in a reduction in overall pain at H2 (2.3 vs 3.2, P<0.0001), H4 (2.3 vs 3.1, P<0.0001) and H6 (2.3 vs 2.7, P=0.0039). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of antalgic consumption, postoperative complications, or the number of ambulatory conversions.

Conclusion: The placement of CycloMesh™ soaked with ropivacaine did not reduce the pain at cough at H6 but did reduce overall pain in the first 6hours after surgery and could simplify patient management.

CycloMesh™+Ropivacaine 治疗 Lichtenstein 手术后无并发症腹股沟疝的疗效:一项前瞻性多中心双盲研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visceral Surgery (JVS) is the online-only, English version of the French Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale. The journal focuses on clinical research and continuing education, and publishes original and review articles related to general surgery, as well as press reviews of recently published major international works. High-quality illustrations of surgical techniques, images and videos serve as support for clinical evaluation and practice optimization. JVS is indexed in the main international databases (including Medline) and is accessible worldwide through ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信