The evolution of telehealth in early-onset scoliosis care throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sylvia Culpepper, Robert F Murphy, R Carter Clement
{"title":"The evolution of telehealth in early-onset scoliosis care throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Sylvia Culpepper, Robert F Murphy, R Carter Clement","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-01021-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the adoption and sustained use of telehealth for managing early-onset scoliosis (EOS) during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 35-question anonymous survey was emailed to 191 physician members of an international pediatric spine research group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety seven clinicians completed the survey (51%). Of the 78% who reported that they currently use telehealth for EOS patients, 44% do so rarely; 21% do not use telehealth at all for EOS patients. Pre-pandemic, 37% used telehealth, increasing to 93% during the pandemic, with 40% using telehealth for most visits and 33% for a quarter of visits (p < 0.001). Post-pandemic usage was significantly higher than pre-pandemic levels (p < 0.001). Bracing was the favored treatment to monitor via telehealth (61% of respondents). Minor curves and initial post-op visits were ranked as the most suitable for remote care (77% of respondents). Geography and transport issues were the most cited drivers of telehealth (71% and 57% of respondents, respectively). No specific subset of EOS was particularly suitable for telehealth. The most common exam techniques used via telehealth included back inspection (88%), observing gait/posture (58%), and Adams test (46%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic saw a significant increase in telehealth services for EOS patients (p < 0.001). While most patients returned to in-person visits post-pandemic, a significant number continued to use telehealth, especially when compared to pre-pandemic (p < 0.001). This persistent use, particularly for patients treated with bracing and to monitor minor curves, highlights the opportunity to optimize EOS care by strategically blending telemedicine with conventional clinic visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-01021-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the adoption and sustained use of telehealth for managing early-onset scoliosis (EOS) during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A 35-question anonymous survey was emailed to 191 physician members of an international pediatric spine research group.

Results: Ninety seven clinicians completed the survey (51%). Of the 78% who reported that they currently use telehealth for EOS patients, 44% do so rarely; 21% do not use telehealth at all for EOS patients. Pre-pandemic, 37% used telehealth, increasing to 93% during the pandemic, with 40% using telehealth for most visits and 33% for a quarter of visits (p < 0.001). Post-pandemic usage was significantly higher than pre-pandemic levels (p < 0.001). Bracing was the favored treatment to monitor via telehealth (61% of respondents). Minor curves and initial post-op visits were ranked as the most suitable for remote care (77% of respondents). Geography and transport issues were the most cited drivers of telehealth (71% and 57% of respondents, respectively). No specific subset of EOS was particularly suitable for telehealth. The most common exam techniques used via telehealth included back inspection (88%), observing gait/posture (58%), and Adams test (46%).

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic saw a significant increase in telehealth services for EOS patients (p < 0.001). While most patients returned to in-person visits post-pandemic, a significant number continued to use telehealth, especially when compared to pre-pandemic (p < 0.001). This persistent use, particularly for patients treated with bracing and to monitor minor curves, highlights the opportunity to optimize EOS care by strategically blending telemedicine with conventional clinic visits.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗在早期脊柱侧凸护理中的发展。
目的:调查在COVID-19大流行期间和之后采用远程医疗管理早发性脊柱侧凸(EOS)的情况:方法: 通过电子邮件向一个国际儿科脊柱研究小组的 191 名医生成员发送了一份包含 35 个问题的匿名调查:结果:97 名临床医生(51%)完成了调查。78%的医生表示他们目前对 EOS 患者使用远程医疗,其中 44% 的医生很少使用远程医疗;21% 的医生完全不对 EOS 患者使用远程医疗。大流行前,37% 的人使用远程保健,大流行期间增加到 93%,其中 40% 的人在大多数就诊中使用远程保健,33% 的人在四分之一的就诊中使用远程保健(P 结论):在 COVID-19 大流行期间,为 EOS 患者提供的远程保健服务显著增加(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信