Routine machine quality assurance tests for a self-shielded gyroscopic radiosurgery system.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yongsook C Lee, Ranjini Tolakanahalli, D Jay Wieczorek, Minesh P Mehta, Michael W McDermott, Rupesh Kotecha, Alonso N Gutierrez
{"title":"Routine machine quality assurance tests for a self-shielded gyroscopic radiosurgery system.","authors":"Yongsook C Lee, Ranjini Tolakanahalli, D Jay Wieczorek, Minesh P Mehta, Michael W McDermott, Rupesh Kotecha, Alonso N Gutierrez","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This report describes routine machine quality assurance (QA) (daily, monthly, and annual QA) tests for the Zap-X<sup>®</sup> Gyroscopic Radiosurgery<sup>®</sup> platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (AAPM TG)-142 and Medical Physics Practice guideline (MPPG) 8.b, routine machine QA tests for the Zap-X system were implemented. The implementation included (1) daily, monthly, and annual QA tests encompassing dosimetry, mechanical, safety and imaging tests, (2) QA methods of each test specific to the Zap-X, (3) a tolerance value for each test, and (4) necessary QA equipment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline values and key results of daily, monthly, and annual QA tests are presented in this report. This report also discusses QA tests not adopted from TG 142 or MPPG 8.b (e.g., distance indicator) due to unique features of the Zap-X system as well as additional QA tests added from the vendor's recommendations (e.g., self-check) and from TG-135 recommendations (e.g., monthly end-to-end testing) because of similarities between Zap-X and CyberKnife systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The comprehensive information on routine machine QA tests presented in this report will assist Zap-X teams in other Neurosurgery centers or Radiation Oncology clinics in establishing and maintaining their QA programs until AAPM endorsed guidelines become available.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This report describes routine machine quality assurance (QA) (daily, monthly, and annual QA) tests for the Zap-X® Gyroscopic Radiosurgery® platform.

Methods: Following the recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (AAPM TG)-142 and Medical Physics Practice guideline (MPPG) 8.b, routine machine QA tests for the Zap-X system were implemented. The implementation included (1) daily, monthly, and annual QA tests encompassing dosimetry, mechanical, safety and imaging tests, (2) QA methods of each test specific to the Zap-X, (3) a tolerance value for each test, and (4) necessary QA equipment.

Results: Baseline values and key results of daily, monthly, and annual QA tests are presented in this report. This report also discusses QA tests not adopted from TG 142 or MPPG 8.b (e.g., distance indicator) due to unique features of the Zap-X system as well as additional QA tests added from the vendor's recommendations (e.g., self-check) and from TG-135 recommendations (e.g., monthly end-to-end testing) because of similarities between Zap-X and CyberKnife systems.

Conclusions: The comprehensive information on routine machine QA tests presented in this report will assist Zap-X teams in other Neurosurgery centers or Radiation Oncology clinics in establishing and maintaining their QA programs until AAPM endorsed guidelines become available.

自屏蔽陀螺仪放射外科系统的常规机器质量保证测试。
目的:本报告介绍了 Zap-X® 陀螺仪放射手术® 平台的常规机器质量保证 (QA)(每日、每月和每年的质量保证)测试:按照美国医学物理学家协会工作组 (AAPM TG)-142 和医学物理实践指南 (MPPG) 8.b 的建议,对 Zap-X 系统实施了常规机器质量保证测试。实施内容包括:(1) 每日、每月和每年的质量保证测试,包括剂量测定、机械、安全和成像测试;(2) 针对 Zap-X 的每项测试的质量保证方法;(3) 每项测试的容许值;(4) 必要的质量保证设备:本报告介绍了每日、每月和每年质量保证测试的基准值和主要结果。本报告还讨论了因 Zap-X 系统的独特性而未被 TG 142 或 MPPG 8.b 采用的质量保证测试(如距离指示器),以及因 Zap-X 和 CyberKnife 系统的相似性而根据供应商建议(如自我检查)和 TG-135 建议(如每月端到端测试)增加的质量保证测试:本报告中提供的有关常规机器质量保证测试的综合信息将有助于其他神经外科中心或放射肿瘤诊所的 Zap-X 团队建立和维护其质量保证计划,直至获得 AAPM 认可的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信