Diffusion veineuse et capillaire de enterococcus faecalis lors de bactériémies expérimentales chez le poulet

J.C Labarthe , J.F Guillot , A Brée , C Mouline
{"title":"Diffusion veineuse et capillaire de enterococcus faecalis lors de bactériémies expérimentales chez le poulet","authors":"J.C Labarthe ,&nbsp;J.F Guillot ,&nbsp;A Brée ,&nbsp;C Mouline","doi":"10.1016/0769-2609(88)90160-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Capillary and venous diffusion of bacteria were studied in chickens after intravenous inoculation with a strain of <em>Enterococcus faecais</em> isolated from a case of septicaemia in a human neonate.</p><p>One group of 13 chickens was inoculated with 10<sup>8</sup> bacteria/animal and another group of 20 chickens with 10<sup>7</sup> bacteria/animal. The level of bacteraemia in the first group of chickens was similar in capillary and venous blood. With 10<sup>8</sup><em>E. faecalis</em>, the clearance of bacteria was very weak. The level of bacteraemia in the second group was significantly higher (after 180 min) in capillary than in venous blood, which suggests slower bacterial clearance in capillary than in venous blood. However, clearance was more efficient with the inoculum of 10<sup>7</sup><em>E. faecalis</em> than with the first type of inoculum.</p><p>These experimental data confirm the greated sensitivity of capillary rather than venous sampling, which we have already observed in chickens, under similar experimental conditions, with <em>Escherichia coli</em> K12. Persistance of bacteria in the capillaries could account for the higher level of sensitivity of capillary microblood culture than venous blood culture, which is in agreement with the capillary trapping hypothesis of Knudson and Alden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77666,"journal":{"name":"Annales de l'Institut Pasteur. Microbiology","volume":"139 5","pages":"Pages 631-636"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0769-2609(88)90160-3","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de l'Institut Pasteur. Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0769260988901603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Capillary and venous diffusion of bacteria were studied in chickens after intravenous inoculation with a strain of Enterococcus faecais isolated from a case of septicaemia in a human neonate.

One group of 13 chickens was inoculated with 108 bacteria/animal and another group of 20 chickens with 107 bacteria/animal. The level of bacteraemia in the first group of chickens was similar in capillary and venous blood. With 108E. faecalis, the clearance of bacteria was very weak. The level of bacteraemia in the second group was significantly higher (after 180 min) in capillary than in venous blood, which suggests slower bacterial clearance in capillary than in venous blood. However, clearance was more efficient with the inoculum of 107E. faecalis than with the first type of inoculum.

These experimental data confirm the greated sensitivity of capillary rather than venous sampling, which we have already observed in chickens, under similar experimental conditions, with Escherichia coli K12. Persistance of bacteria in the capillaries could account for the higher level of sensitivity of capillary microblood culture than venous blood culture, which is in agreement with the capillary trapping hypothesis of Knudson and Alden.

鸡实验细菌学中粪肠球菌的静脉和毛细血管扩散
用一株从新生儿败血症中分离的粪肠球菌静脉接种鸡后,研究了细菌在鸡体内的毛细血管和静脉扩散。每组13只鸡接种108个细菌/动物,每组20只鸡接种107个细菌/动物。第一组鸡毛细血管和静脉血菌血症水平相似。108 e。粪球菌对细菌的清除率很弱。第二组在180分钟后毛细血管中的菌血症水平明显高于静脉血,这表明毛细血管中的细菌清除速度比静脉血慢。而接种107E时,清除率更高。粪球菌多于第一种接种方式。这些实验数据证实了毛细管取样比静脉取样更敏感,我们已经在鸡中观察到,在类似的实验条件下,用大肠杆菌K12取样。细菌在毛细血管中的持续存在可以解释毛细血管微血培养比静脉血培养敏感性更高的原因,这与Knudson和Alden的毛细血管捕获假说一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信