[Work experience and work environment of midwives in German maternity theatres: Implications for the quality and safety of care].

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Katja Stahl
{"title":"[Work experience and work environment of midwives in German maternity theatres: Implications for the quality and safety of care].","authors":"Katja Stahl","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing research indicates a correlation between work environment and the quality and safety of nursing care. For intrapartum care there is evidence that continuous one-to-one support is associated with better perinatal outcomes and fewer interventions. Little is known about the work environment of midwives working in German maternity theatres.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyse the work environment in German maternity theatres from the midwife's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online survey among 1,599 midwives using a validated instrument adapted to the specific characteristics of midwifery care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate for the survey was 44%. The number of patients has risen substantially over the last three years without an equivalent increase in staff numbers. Nearly two thirds of the midwives (65%) are responsible for three or more women simultaneously, most of the time; 35% are normally providing care for two women at the same time. There are significant differences between these two groups with regard to nearly all the work environment aspects analysed. The most pronounced differences were found with regard to not being able to accomplish tasks during regular working hours (64% vs. 33%; OR 3.7, 95% CI 3.0 to 4.6; p<0.001), taking legally required breaks (5% vs. 19%; OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.9 to 5.9; p<0.001), frequency of interruptions (96% vs. 88%; OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.3 to 5.4; p<0.001), lack of time for individual care (90% vs. 63%; OR 5.6, 95% CI 4.2 to 7.4; p<0.001), need for improving the personal interaction between midwives and obstetricians (28% vs. 20%; OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0; p=0.001), lack of support from hospital management (92% vs. 83%; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.1; p<0.001) and the intention to leave the employer (60% vs. 40%; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.7; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current work environment of midwives in German maternity theatres does not allow for one-to-one-care during labour. If the necessary increase in midwifery staff is to be effective, it needs to be accompanied by an improved work environment. Further research into the work environment of midwives, likely predictors and associations with perinatal outcomes is urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing research indicates a correlation between work environment and the quality and safety of nursing care. For intrapartum care there is evidence that continuous one-to-one support is associated with better perinatal outcomes and fewer interventions. Little is known about the work environment of midwives working in German maternity theatres.

Aim: To analyse the work environment in German maternity theatres from the midwife's perspective.

Methods: Online survey among 1,599 midwives using a validated instrument adapted to the specific characteristics of midwifery care.

Results: The response rate for the survey was 44%. The number of patients has risen substantially over the last three years without an equivalent increase in staff numbers. Nearly two thirds of the midwives (65%) are responsible for three or more women simultaneously, most of the time; 35% are normally providing care for two women at the same time. There are significant differences between these two groups with regard to nearly all the work environment aspects analysed. The most pronounced differences were found with regard to not being able to accomplish tasks during regular working hours (64% vs. 33%; OR 3.7, 95% CI 3.0 to 4.6; p<0.001), taking legally required breaks (5% vs. 19%; OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.9 to 5.9; p<0.001), frequency of interruptions (96% vs. 88%; OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.3 to 5.4; p<0.001), lack of time for individual care (90% vs. 63%; OR 5.6, 95% CI 4.2 to 7.4; p<0.001), need for improving the personal interaction between midwives and obstetricians (28% vs. 20%; OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0; p=0.001), lack of support from hospital management (92% vs. 83%; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.1; p<0.001) and the intention to leave the employer (60% vs. 40%; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.7; p<0.001).

Conclusion: The current work environment of midwives in German maternity theatres does not allow for one-to-one-care during labour. If the necessary increase in midwifery staff is to be effective, it needs to be accompanied by an improved work environment. Further research into the work environment of midwives, likely predictors and associations with perinatal outcomes is urgently needed.

背景:护理研究表明,工作环境与护理质量和安全息息相关。在产前护理方面,有证据表明持续的一对一支持与更好的围产期结果和更少的干预措施有关。人们对在德国产科医院工作的助产士的工作环境知之甚少。目的:从助产士的角度分析德国产科医院的工作环境:方法:对 1599 名助产士进行在线调查,使用根据助产护理的具体特点进行调整的有效工具:结果:调查回复率为 44%。在过去的三年中,病人数量大幅增加,但工作人员数量却没有相应增加。近三分之二的助产士(65%)在大多数情况下同时负责三名或三名以上的妇女;35%的助产士通常同时负责两名妇女。这两组助产士在几乎所有工作环境分析方面都存在明显差异。在无法在正常工作时间内完成任务方面的差异最为明显(64% 对 33%;OR 3.7,95% CI 3.0 至 4.6;p):德国产科医院助产士目前的工作环境不允许在分娩期间进行一对一护理。如果要有效地增加助产士人数,就必须同时改善工作环境。目前急需对助产士的工作环境、可能的预测因素以及与围产期结果的关联进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信