Association of atrial fibrillation with lamotrigine: An observational cohort study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1002/phar.4633
Sodam Kim, Landon Welch, Bertha De Los Santos, Przemysław B Radwański, Mark A Munger, Kibum Kim
{"title":"Association of atrial fibrillation with lamotrigine: An observational cohort study.","authors":"Sodam Kim, Landon Welch, Bertha De Los Santos, Przemysław B Radwański, Mark A Munger, Kibum Kim","doi":"10.1002/phar.4633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as an important causal association. Lamotrigine (LTG) is a widely prescribed neurological agent with Class IB antiarrhythmic properties at therapeutically relevant concentrations. The United States Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning for a higher risk of LTG proarrhythmic events in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and/or myocardial ischemia. This study evaluated the incidence of AF with LTG use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed using a large healthcare claims database of adult participants analyzing 2 years AF incidence. The analytic cohort included adult participants with bipolar I disorder (BPD), partial seizures (PSZ), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTSZ). Exposure to LTG was compared with commonly prescribed alternative agents as the control comparators (CTR). Participants were free from supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias during the 6 months baseline period prior to the index LTG or CTR date. Kaplan-Meier estimator calculated 2 years cumulative AF incidence, with participants censored at last enrollment, treatment switching, or discontinuation. The AF association hazard ratios (HR) for LTG versus CTR were adjusted for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic cohort with BPD, PSZ, and GTSZ consisted, respectively, of 150,470 LTG versus 204,704 CTR, 9565 LTG versus 21,595 CTR, and 5505 LTG versus 15,513 CTR patients. In a predominantly middle-aged female population at baseline, the prevalence of cardiovascular conditions was low. The 12 months cumulative incidence of AF for LTG versus CTR was 0.764% versus 0.642% among BPD, 0.833% versus 0.646% among PSZ, and 0.585% versus 0.338% among GTSZ, respectively. The adjusted 365-day HR [95% confidence interval CI] of AF for LTG versus CTR in the BPD, PSZ, and CTSZ groups was 1.257 [1.088-1.453], 1.651 [1.104-2.468], and 1.451 [0.770-2.734], respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adult AF-naïve participants, LTG has a strong association with increased AF risk compared with commonly prescribed alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"20-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as an important causal association. Lamotrigine (LTG) is a widely prescribed neurological agent with Class IB antiarrhythmic properties at therapeutically relevant concentrations. The United States Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning for a higher risk of LTG proarrhythmic events in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and/or myocardial ischemia. This study evaluated the incidence of AF with LTG use.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed using a large healthcare claims database of adult participants analyzing 2 years AF incidence. The analytic cohort included adult participants with bipolar I disorder (BPD), partial seizures (PSZ), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTSZ). Exposure to LTG was compared with commonly prescribed alternative agents as the control comparators (CTR). Participants were free from supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias during the 6 months baseline period prior to the index LTG or CTR date. Kaplan-Meier estimator calculated 2 years cumulative AF incidence, with participants censored at last enrollment, treatment switching, or discontinuation. The AF association hazard ratios (HR) for LTG versus CTR were adjusted for baseline characteristics.

Results: The analytic cohort with BPD, PSZ, and GTSZ consisted, respectively, of 150,470 LTG versus 204,704 CTR, 9565 LTG versus 21,595 CTR, and 5505 LTG versus 15,513 CTR patients. In a predominantly middle-aged female population at baseline, the prevalence of cardiovascular conditions was low. The 12 months cumulative incidence of AF for LTG versus CTR was 0.764% versus 0.642% among BPD, 0.833% versus 0.646% among PSZ, and 0.585% versus 0.338% among GTSZ, respectively. The adjusted 365-day HR [95% confidence interval CI] of AF for LTG versus CTR in the BPD, PSZ, and CTSZ groups was 1.257 [1.088-1.453], 1.651 [1.104-2.468], and 1.451 [0.770-2.734], respectively.

Conclusions: In adult AF-naïve participants, LTG has a strong association with increased AF risk compared with commonly prescribed alternatives.

心房颤动与拉莫三嗪的关系:一项观察性队列研究
背景:药物性心房颤动(AF)被认为是一个重要的因果关系。拉莫三嗪(LTG)是一种广泛使用的神经系统药物,在治疗相关浓度下具有IB级抗心律失常特性。美国食品和药物管理局(fda)发出警告,结构性心脏病(SHD)和/或心肌缺血患者发生LTG促心律失常事件的风险较高。本研究评估了使用LTG后房颤的发生率。方法:回顾性观察研究使用大型成人医疗保健索赔数据库,分析2年房颤发病率。分析队列包括患有双相I型障碍(BPD)、部分性发作(PSZ)或全身性强直-阵挛性发作(GTSZ)的成年参与者。将暴露于LTG与常用处方替代药物作为对照比较剂(CTR)进行比较。在LTG指数或CTR日期之前的6个月基线期间,参与者无室上性或室性心律失常。Kaplan-Meier估计计算了2年累积AF发病率,受试者在最后入组、治疗切换或停药时被剔除。根据基线特征调整LTG与CTR的心房颤动相关风险比(HR)。结果:BPD、PSZ和GTSZ的分析队列分别包括150,470例LTG对204,704例CTR, 9565例LTG对21,595例CTR, 5505例LTG对15,513例CTR。在基线时以中年女性为主的人群中,心血管疾病的患病率很低。LTG与CTR的12个月累积AF发病率在BPD中分别为0.764%和0.642%,PSZ中分别为0.833%和0.646%,GTSZ中分别为0.585%和0.338%。BPD、PSZ和CTSZ组LTG AF与CTR的校正365天HR[95%可信区间CI]分别为1.257[1.088-1.453]、1.651[1.104-2.468]和1.451[0.77 -2.734]。结论:在成人AF-naïve参与者中,与常用处方替代品相比,LTG与房颤风险增加有很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信