Clinical course of masticatory function recovery following endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation in patients with unilateral mandibular condyle fracture.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Shinnosuke Nogami, Yushi Ezoe, Yuri Takeda, Yoshio Otake, Hiromitsu Morishima, Kensuke Yamauchi
{"title":"Clinical course of masticatory function recovery following endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation in patients with unilateral mandibular condyle fracture.","authors":"Shinnosuke Nogami, Yushi Ezoe, Yuri Takeda, Yoshio Otake, Hiromitsu Morishima, Kensuke Yamauchi","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical course of masticatory function recovery following an endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation (EAORIF) procedure. Patients with a unilateral mandibular condylar fracture who underwent EAORIF for therapeutic purposes were evaluated, with comparisons made between those who underwent the procedure for base or neck fractures. At each time point analyzed after treatment, the occlusal contact area and maximum bite force in patients with a base fracture were greater, although the differences between the groups were not significant. Moreover, at 12 months following EAORIF for a base fracture, occlusal contact area and maximum bite force on the fractured and non-fractured sides were nearly equal, whereas these were significantly reduced in the fractured as compared with the non-fractured side in patients who underwent that treatment for a neck fracture. Additionally, after 12 months in the neck fracture cases, both occlusal contact area and maximum bite force on the fractured side were lower as compared with those on the non-fractured side. These findings indicate that EAORIF is an optimal method for base fracture treatment with regard to masticatory function.</p>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2024.12.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical course of masticatory function recovery following an endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation (EAORIF) procedure. Patients with a unilateral mandibular condylar fracture who underwent EAORIF for therapeutic purposes were evaluated, with comparisons made between those who underwent the procedure for base or neck fractures. At each time point analyzed after treatment, the occlusal contact area and maximum bite force in patients with a base fracture were greater, although the differences between the groups were not significant. Moreover, at 12 months following EAORIF for a base fracture, occlusal contact area and maximum bite force on the fractured and non-fractured sides were nearly equal, whereas these were significantly reduced in the fractured as compared with the non-fractured side in patients who underwent that treatment for a neck fracture. Additionally, after 12 months in the neck fracture cases, both occlusal contact area and maximum bite force on the fractured side were lower as compared with those on the non-fractured side. These findings indicate that EAORIF is an optimal method for base fracture treatment with regard to masticatory function.

内窥镜辅助下单侧髁突骨折切开复位内固定后咀嚼功能恢复的临床过程。
本研究的目的是探讨内窥镜辅助切开复位内固定(EAORIF)手术后咀嚼功能恢复的临床过程。对单侧下颌髁骨折接受eorif治疗的患者进行了评估,并对那些接受基础或颈部骨折手术的患者进行了比较。治疗后各时间点分析,基端骨折患者的咬合接触面积和最大咬合力均较大,但组间差异无统计学意义。此外,在基底骨折eorif治疗12个月后,骨折侧和非骨折侧的咬合接触面积和最大咬合力几乎相等,而在颈部骨折患者中,骨折侧的咬合接触面积和最大咬合力明显低于接受该治疗的非骨折侧。此外,12个月后颈部骨折病例中,骨折侧的咬合接触面积和最大咬合力均低于未骨折侧。这些结果表明,在咀嚼功能方面,eorif是治疗基底骨折的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信