Long-term cerebrovascular outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure in observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Areeba Asghar, Luxshikka Canthiya, Ani Khachatrian, Varnita Vishwanath, Eduardo Flores-Umanzor, Ashley Farrell, Yeva Sahakyan, Jonah Himelfarb, Eric M Horlick, Lusine Abrahamyan
{"title":"Long-term cerebrovascular outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure in observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Areeba Asghar, Luxshikka Canthiya, Ani Khachatrian, Varnita Vishwanath, Eduardo Flores-Umanzor, Ashley Farrell, Yeva Sahakyan, Jonah Himelfarb, Eric M Horlick, Lusine Abrahamyan","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is recommended for patients who experience a cryptogenic stroke attributable to PFO. Although few randomized control trials (RCTs) have captured long-term effectiveness of PFO closure, observational data has been abundant. This is the first systematic review of observational studies determining incidence of long-term adverse outcomes in adults who underwent transcatheter PFO closure, with comparisons to findings from RCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched from inception to October 2023. Only observational studies with ≥4 years of mean or median follow-up were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the incidence of recurrent stroke after PFO closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After reviewing 2,432 records, 13 prospective and 12 retrospective cohort studies were included. Average follow-up lengths ranged from 4 to 12.3 years, and sample sizes from 75 to 1,533 participants. The average age ranged between 43.5-63.0, and 24.0-72.8% patients had an atrial septal aneurysm. The incidence of stroke was 0.34 per 100 person-years (I<sup>2</sup> = 67%). This was similar to rates from four RCTs that were used for comparison (0.35 per 100 person-years, I<sup>2</sup>= 51%). There was a significant improvement in heterogeneity once the study with one of the largest follow-up was removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-world PFO closure studies with long-term follow-up report similar outcomes as RCTs which is important considering the exclusion of several important populations from trials. Future observational studies should include more rigorous reporting of follow-up strategies and explore different long-term adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"108189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is recommended for patients who experience a cryptogenic stroke attributable to PFO. Although few randomized control trials (RCTs) have captured long-term effectiveness of PFO closure, observational data has been abundant. This is the first systematic review of observational studies determining incidence of long-term adverse outcomes in adults who underwent transcatheter PFO closure, with comparisons to findings from RCTs.

Methods: Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched from inception to October 2023. Only observational studies with ≥4 years of mean or median follow-up were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the incidence of recurrent stroke after PFO closure.

Results: After reviewing 2,432 records, 13 prospective and 12 retrospective cohort studies were included. Average follow-up lengths ranged from 4 to 12.3 years, and sample sizes from 75 to 1,533 participants. The average age ranged between 43.5-63.0, and 24.0-72.8% patients had an atrial septal aneurysm. The incidence of stroke was 0.34 per 100 person-years (I2 = 67%). This was similar to rates from four RCTs that were used for comparison (0.35 per 100 person-years, I2= 51%). There was a significant improvement in heterogeneity once the study with one of the largest follow-up was removed.

Conclusions: Real-world PFO closure studies with long-term follow-up report similar outcomes as RCTs which is important considering the exclusion of several important populations from trials. Future observational studies should include more rigorous reporting of follow-up strategies and explore different long-term adverse outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信