Comparison of HEmorrhage on CT versus MRI After ThrombEctomy: The HECATE study.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30
Amie W Hsia, Lawrence L Latour, Sana Somani, Carolyn A Lomahan, Yongwoo Kim, John K Lynch, Marie Luby
{"title":"Comparison of HEmorrhage on CT versus MRI After ThrombEctomy: The HECATE study.","authors":"Amie W Hsia, Lawrence L Latour, Sana Somani, Carolyn A Lomahan, Yongwoo Kim, John K Lynch, Marie Luby","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The characterization of hemorrhage following acute stroke intervention has largely been CT-based. We sought to compare MRI- and CT-based scoring of hemorrhage after acute endovascular therapy (EVT) applying the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC) to assess inter-modal agreement and quantify inter-rater agreement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive acute stroke patients were included in this retrospective study if they: i) had MRI and CT ≤12 hours of each other OR ii) had CT bracketed by MRI pre- and post-CT [i.e. MRI-CT-MRI] ≤7 days post-EVT. The concordance of the HBC ratings by consensus panel were compared between CT and T2*GRE MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 87 EVT-treated patients included, median age was 68 years [60-74], admit NIHSS 18 [13-23], 47% were treated with IV/IA thrombolytics, and 93% were successfully recanalized (mTICI 2b/3). Hemorrhage was detected on at least one modality in 60% (52/87) of patients. We found a 68% (59/87, 95% CI [57-77%]) agreement overall between CT and MRI for hemorrhage classification post-EVT. MRI had the best inter-rater agreement for HBC 0 (no hemorrhage) with excellent concordance (κ=0.882), compared to CT (κ=0.683). T2*GRE MRI tended to have increased sensitivity to scattered petechial hemorrhage (HBC 1a) as compared to CT with 17% (2/12) inter-modal agreement. The inter-rater agreement of HBC class 2 (i.e. PH-2) was substantial for MRI (κ=0.781) and excellent in CT (κ=0.951), with 67% (8 /12) inter-modal agreement. SAH was detected in 24% (21/87) of patients on CT and/or MRI with 29% (6/21) inter-modal agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the exception of SAH and minor petechial hemorrhagic transformation, we found that MRI and CT are overall interchangeable for detecting and classifying hemorrhage after endovascular therapy, reassuring findings for both clinical-decision making and research application. Given the complexity of hemorrhage subtypes post-EVT, work to further refine a post-EVT hemorrhage classification scale with clinical correlation would be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"4 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The characterization of hemorrhage following acute stroke intervention has largely been CT-based. We sought to compare MRI- and CT-based scoring of hemorrhage after acute endovascular therapy (EVT) applying the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC) to assess inter-modal agreement and quantify inter-rater agreement.

Methods: Consecutive acute stroke patients were included in this retrospective study if they: i) had MRI and CT ≤12 hours of each other OR ii) had CT bracketed by MRI pre- and post-CT [i.e. MRI-CT-MRI] ≤7 days post-EVT. The concordance of the HBC ratings by consensus panel were compared between CT and T2*GRE MRI.

Results: For the 87 EVT-treated patients included, median age was 68 years [60-74], admit NIHSS 18 [13-23], 47% were treated with IV/IA thrombolytics, and 93% were successfully recanalized (mTICI 2b/3). Hemorrhage was detected on at least one modality in 60% (52/87) of patients. We found a 68% (59/87, 95% CI [57-77%]) agreement overall between CT and MRI for hemorrhage classification post-EVT. MRI had the best inter-rater agreement for HBC 0 (no hemorrhage) with excellent concordance (κ=0.882), compared to CT (κ=0.683). T2*GRE MRI tended to have increased sensitivity to scattered petechial hemorrhage (HBC 1a) as compared to CT with 17% (2/12) inter-modal agreement. The inter-rater agreement of HBC class 2 (i.e. PH-2) was substantial for MRI (κ=0.781) and excellent in CT (κ=0.951), with 67% (8 /12) inter-modal agreement. SAH was detected in 24% (21/87) of patients on CT and/or MRI with 29% (6/21) inter-modal agreement.

Conclusions: With the exception of SAH and minor petechial hemorrhagic transformation, we found that MRI and CT are overall interchangeable for detecting and classifying hemorrhage after endovascular therapy, reassuring findings for both clinical-decision making and research application. Given the complexity of hemorrhage subtypes post-EVT, work to further refine a post-EVT hemorrhage classification scale with clinical correlation would be beneficial.

血栓切除术后 CT 与 MRI 上 HEmorrhage 的比较:HECATE 研究。
背景:急性卒中干预后出血的特征主要是基于ct的。我们试图比较急性血管内治疗(EVT)后出血的MRI和ct评分,应用海德堡出血分类(HBC)来评估多模式一致性和量化多模式一致性。方法:连续急性脑卒中患者纳入本回顾性研究,如果他们:i) MRI和CT间隔≤12小时,或ii) evt后≤7天,CT前和CT后(即MRI-CT-MRI)将CT合并。比较CT与T2*GRE MRI的HBC评分一致性。结果:纳入的87例evt治疗患者中位年龄为68岁[60-74],入院NIHSS 18[13-23], 47%接受静脉/内溶栓治疗,93%成功再通(mTICI 2b/3)。60%(52/87)的患者至少在一种模式下检测到出血。我们发现,CT和MRI对evt后出血分类的总体一致性为68% (59/87,95% CI[57-77%])。与CT (κ=0.683)相比,MRI对HBC 0(无出血)的一致性最好,一致性极好(κ=0.882)。与CT相比,T2*GRE MRI对散在性点状出血(HBC 1a)的敏感性增加,两者间模态一致性为17%(2/12)。HBC 2级(即PH-2)在MRI上的一致性很好(κ=0.781),在CT上的一致性很好(κ=0.951),有67%(8 /12)的一致性。24%(21/87)的患者在CT和/或MRI上检测到SAH, 29%(6/21)的多模式一致性。结论:除了SAH和轻微点状出血转化外,我们发现MRI和CT在血管内治疗后出血的检测和分类方面总体上是可互换的,这为临床决策和研究应用提供了可靠的结果。鉴于evt后出血亚型的复杂性,进一步完善具有临床相关性的evt后出血分类量表将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信