Behavioral Economic Strategies Increase Adverse Event Reporting in Pediatric Anesthesia.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-12-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S499363
Tiffany K Guan, Brittany L Willer, Jack Stevens, Joseph D Tobias, Vanessa A Olbrecht
{"title":"Behavioral Economic Strategies Increase Adverse Event Reporting in Pediatric Anesthesia.","authors":"Tiffany K Guan, Brittany L Willer, Jack Stevens, Joseph D Tobias, Vanessa A Olbrecht","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S499363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identification and reporting of severe adverse events (SAEs) during anesthesia care remains critical in identifying areas of improvement in perioperative patient care. Although many healthcare organizations rely on the self-reporting of SAEs, under-reporting may limit the identification of the true incidence of these events. To circumvent these barriers, many healthcare systems leverage the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) by incorporating an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model of Improvement and implemented behavioral economic-based interventions to our perioperative practice including adding a deliberation-promoting \"hard stop\" that required the anesthesiologists to report the occurrence or absence of a \"notable event\" prior to closing a patient's encounter in the EMR system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 53% of SAEs were self-reported. The interventions resulted in a baseline shift to more than 75% self-reporting, a relative increase of 42%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An increase in reporting of SAEs was achieved with simple interventions including modifications of the EMR which were done with limited financial impact or interruption in the work flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"841-845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S499363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Identification and reporting of severe adverse events (SAEs) during anesthesia care remains critical in identifying areas of improvement in perioperative patient care. Although many healthcare organizations rely on the self-reporting of SAEs, under-reporting may limit the identification of the true incidence of these events. To circumvent these barriers, many healthcare systems leverage the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) by incorporating an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS).

Methods: We followed the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model of Improvement and implemented behavioral economic-based interventions to our perioperative practice including adding a deliberation-promoting "hard stop" that required the anesthesiologists to report the occurrence or absence of a "notable event" prior to closing a patient's encounter in the EMR system.

Results: At baseline, 53% of SAEs were self-reported. The interventions resulted in a baseline shift to more than 75% self-reporting, a relative increase of 42%.

Conclusion: An increase in reporting of SAEs was achieved with simple interventions including modifications of the EMR which were done with limited financial impact or interruption in the work flow.

行为经济策略增加儿科麻醉不良事件报告。
导言:麻醉护理期间严重不良事件(SAE)的识别和报告对于确定围术期患者护理的改进领域至关重要。尽管许多医疗机构依赖于 SAE 的自我报告,但报告不足可能会限制对这些事件真实发生率的识别。为了规避这些障碍,许多医疗保健系统通过整合麻醉信息管理系统(AIMS)来利用电子病历(EMR):方法:我们遵循医疗保健改进研究所的改进模式,在围术期实践中实施了基于行为经济学的干预措施,包括增加一个促进慎重考虑的 "硬性停止",要求麻醉医师在 EMR 系统中关闭患者诊疗之前报告是否发生了 "显著事件":结果:基线时,53% 的 SAE 是自行报告的。干预措施使基线自我报告率超过 75%,相对提高了 42%:结论:通过简单的干预措施,包括修改电子病历系统,就能提高 SAE 的报告率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信