Using machine learning to identify risk factors for short-term complications following thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty.

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jham.2024.100156
Rohan M Shah, Rushmin Khazanchi, Anitesh Bajaj, Krishi Rana, Saaz Malhotra, Jennifer Moriatis Wolf
{"title":"Using machine learning to identify risk factors for short-term complications following thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty.","authors":"Rohan M Shah, Rushmin Khazanchi, Anitesh Bajaj, Krishi Rana, Saaz Malhotra, Jennifer Moriatis Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.jham.2024.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis is among the most common degenerative hand diseases. Thumb CMC arthroplasty, or trapeziectomy with or without tendon augmentation, is the most frequently performed surgical treatment and has a strong safety profile. Though adverse outcomes are infrequent, the ability to predict risk for complications has substantial clinical benefits. In the present study, we evaluated a well-known surgical database with machine learning (ML) techniques to predict short-term complications and reoperations after thumb CMC arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) years 2005-2020. Outcomes were 30-day wound and medical complications and 30-day return to the operating room. We used three ML algorithms - a Random Forest (RF), Elastic-Net Regression (ENet), and Extreme Gradient Boosted Tree (XGBoost), and a deep learning Neural Network (NN). Feature importance analysis was performed in the highest performing model for each outcome to identify predictors with the greatest contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included a total of 7711 cases. The RF was the best performing algorithm for all outcomes, with an AUC score of 0.61±0.03 for reoperations, 0.55±0.04 for medical complications, and 0.59±0.03 for wound complications. On feature importance analysis, procedure duration was the highest weighted predictor for reoperations. In all outcomes, procedure duration, older age, and female sex were consistently among the top five predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We successfully developed ML algorithms to predict reoperations, wound complications, and medical complications. RF models had the highest performance in all outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"16 5","pages":"100156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2024.100156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis is among the most common degenerative hand diseases. Thumb CMC arthroplasty, or trapeziectomy with or without tendon augmentation, is the most frequently performed surgical treatment and has a strong safety profile. Though adverse outcomes are infrequent, the ability to predict risk for complications has substantial clinical benefits. In the present study, we evaluated a well-known surgical database with machine learning (ML) techniques to predict short-term complications and reoperations after thumb CMC arthroplasty.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) years 2005-2020. Outcomes were 30-day wound and medical complications and 30-day return to the operating room. We used three ML algorithms - a Random Forest (RF), Elastic-Net Regression (ENet), and Extreme Gradient Boosted Tree (XGBoost), and a deep learning Neural Network (NN). Feature importance analysis was performed in the highest performing model for each outcome to identify predictors with the greatest contributions.

Results: We included a total of 7711 cases. The RF was the best performing algorithm for all outcomes, with an AUC score of 0.61±0.03 for reoperations, 0.55±0.04 for medical complications, and 0.59±0.03 for wound complications. On feature importance analysis, procedure duration was the highest weighted predictor for reoperations. In all outcomes, procedure duration, older age, and female sex were consistently among the top five predictors.

Conclusions: We successfully developed ML algorithms to predict reoperations, wound complications, and medical complications. RF models had the highest performance in all outcomes.

利用机器学习识别拇指腕掌关节成形术后短期并发症的风险因素。
背景:拇指腕掌(CMC)关节骨关节炎是最常见的手部退行性疾病之一。拇指 CMC 关节成形术或带或不带肌腱增强的梯形切除术是最常用的手术治疗方法,具有很高的安全性。虽然不良后果并不常见,但预测并发症风险的能力具有很大的临床益处。在本研究中,我们利用机器学习(ML)技术评估了一个著名的手术数据库,以预测拇指 CMC 关节置换术后的短期并发症和再手术:我们使用美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)2005-2020 年的数据进行了一项回顾性研究。研究结果包括 30 天伤口和医疗并发症以及 30 天重返手术室情况。我们使用了三种 ML 算法--随机森林 (RF)、弹性网络回归 (ENet) 和极端梯度提升树 (XGBoost),以及深度学习神经网络 (NN)。在每个结果的最高性能模型中进行了特征重要性分析,以确定贡献最大的预测因子:我们共纳入了 7711 个病例。RF是所有结果中表现最好的算法,再手术的AUC为0.61±0.03,医疗并发症为0.55±0.04,伤口并发症为0.59±0.03。在特征重要性分析中,手术持续时间是加权最高的再手术预测因子。在所有结果中,手术持续时间、年龄较大和女性性别始终是前五大预测因素:结论:我们成功开发出了预测再手术、伤口并发症和医疗并发症的 ML 算法。在所有结果中,射频模型的性能最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信