[Barriers and facilitators to the use of mental health prevention programs among preschool- and elementary school-aged children].

Abstract

Background and aims: Emotional and behavioural problems occur frequently in childhood and are usually associated with burdens on children, families, and society. Preventive interventions could reduce these burdens, but are rarely used despite their availability and effectiveness. The aim was to identify general, individual, structural, and family-related barriers/facilitators to potential and actual participation in prevention programs.

Methods: As part of a prospective implementation study, n = 3,231 project folders were handed out to parents in 28 paediatric practices in Dresden and surrounding area during routine health check-ups (U9-U11) for children aged 5 to 10 years. In addition to screening for mental health problems, a questionnaire was used to identify potential barriers/facilitators to participation in prevention programs. Of n = 2,844 families agreeing to participate in the study n = 2,122 (74.6 %) completed the questionnaire at least partially. Regression analyses were used to test associations between potential barriers/facilitators and actual participation in (a) a pre-intervention interview (PII; in order to check indications with the program provider) or (b) the prevention program among children with a prevention recommendation.

Results: Of the participating families, 1.8 % reported that they had already participated in a prevention program to improve mental health or had received a recommendation for it before. 59.5 % of the families expressed their general interest in such programs, and 95.7 % would participate if their paediatrician recommended it. At the structural level, a lack of knowledge about mental health prevention programs was identified as a barrier to potential participation; as only 9.2 % of the families were aware of such programs before participating in the study. 65.8 % of all the families considered full reimbursement of the participation fees after paying in advance a prerequisite for their potential program participation, and 56.7 % wanted to receive a voucher from their health insurance fund entitling them to participate without prepayment. At the individual level, the parents' attitude towards the usefulness of prevention programs predicted the actual utilisation of the PII after the paediatrician's recommendation. At the structural level, the acceptance of longer travel times (up to 60 minutes) as well as the assumption/reimbursement of the entire course fees were relevant predictors. Furthermore, male sex (of the children) and higher screening scores were also important predictors at the family-related level. After the PII, the only factor associated with actual participation in prevention programs was efficient public transport accessibility.

Discussion: In order to increase participation in prevention programs, funding to cover participation fees should be secured through health insurance funds. In addition, advertising and educational measures in the public as well as by paediatricians in the context of screening could raise the awareness of and improve attitudes towards useful programs. Implementing the programs in children's environments could reduce structural barriers and create equal opportunities for participation.