Doing Feminist Research on Conflict, Violence and Peace: Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas.

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
María Martín de Almagro, Julia Margaret Zulver, Priscyll Anctil Avoine, Nancy R Tapias Torrado, Marie Berry
{"title":"Doing Feminist Research on Conflict, Violence and Peace: Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas.","authors":"María Martín de Almagro, Julia Margaret Zulver, Priscyll Anctil Avoine, Nancy R Tapias Torrado, Marie Berry","doi":"10.1177/03058298241298689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This piece offers a space for critical debate and reflection on the methodological and epistemological foundations that underpin feminist research on conflict, violence and peace. Taking stock of the variety of approaches and theoretical standpoints, we examine the (feminist) politics of knowledge production in academia and its limitations. We discuss how ontological and epistemological assumptions shape what counts as (feminist) academic knowledge and what is considered to be possible in (policy) practice. The article makes three contributions. First, we argue that the production of knowledge within disciplinary boundaries, and in particular, International Relations, is closely related to the discipline's history of positivism and exclusion. Second, to counter that, we propose a close engagement with Black and decolonial feminist methods of feeling-knowing, storytelling and collaboration. Third, we highlight that embracing uncertainty means accepting incommensurability and heterogeneity, as well as a shift away from the urge to accumulate knowledge towards paying attention to the process of co-constructing it.</p>","PeriodicalId":18593,"journal":{"name":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"249-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298241298689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This piece offers a space for critical debate and reflection on the methodological and epistemological foundations that underpin feminist research on conflict, violence and peace. Taking stock of the variety of approaches and theoretical standpoints, we examine the (feminist) politics of knowledge production in academia and its limitations. We discuss how ontological and epistemological assumptions shape what counts as (feminist) academic knowledge and what is considered to be possible in (policy) practice. The article makes three contributions. First, we argue that the production of knowledge within disciplinary boundaries, and in particular, International Relations, is closely related to the discipline's history of positivism and exclusion. Second, to counter that, we propose a close engagement with Black and decolonial feminist methods of feeling-knowing, storytelling and collaboration. Third, we highlight that embracing uncertainty means accepting incommensurability and heterogeneity, as well as a shift away from the urge to accumulate knowledge towards paying attention to the process of co-constructing it.

这篇文章提供了一个批判性辩论和反思的空间,探讨了女性主义研究冲突、暴力与和平的方法论和认识论基础。在总结各种方法和理论观点的基础上,我们审视了学术界知识生产的(女权主义)政治及其局限性。我们讨论了本体论和认识论假设是如何塑造(女权主义)学术知识的,以及在(政策)实践中什么是可能的。本文有三点贡献。首先,我们认为在学科界限内的知识生产,尤其是国际关系学,与该学科实证主义和排斥的历史密切相关。其次,为了应对这种情况,我们建议密切参与黑人和非殖民地女性主义的感受-认知、讲故事和合作方法。第三,我们强调,拥抱不确定性意味着接受不可通约性和异质性,以及从积累知识的冲动转向关注共同建构知识的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信