Functional and Radiological Outcome of Meniscal Repair and Conservative Management for Medial Meniscal Root Tear - A Prospective Comparative Study.

K V Arun Kumar, Krishnavel Thavasianantham, Prashanth Pandian, Haemanath Pandian, E Pradeep, Sheik Mohideen
{"title":"Functional and Radiological Outcome of Meniscal Repair and Conservative Management for Medial Meniscal Root Tear - A Prospective Comparative Study.","authors":"K V Arun Kumar, Krishnavel Thavasianantham, Prashanth Pandian, Haemanath Pandian, E Pradeep, Sheik Mohideen","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i12.5080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To sustain hoop stress, prevent extrusion, and maintaining the function of the meniscus, the posterior root attachment point of the medial meniscus is essential. The purpose of this study is to determine the functional and radiological outcome of conservative therapy and meniscal repair for medial meniscal root tears.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Prospective evaluations were performed on forty individuals who confirmed a diagnosis of Medial meniscus root tear (MMRT). Among the 40 patients, 20 underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair and 20 underwent conservative management and followed up a period of 2 years. Functional outcome between two groups was measured using Tegner Lysholm score and IKDC score. Radiological outcome was measured using X-rays (medial joint space width, joint space narrowing, K-L grade).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both group showed improvement in Lysholm score and IKDC. When comparing the clinical outcomes between both the groups, Group A showed significantly better outcome (P = 0.02). About 60% of patients in Group A and all patients in Group B showed K-L grade progression. Of the patients in Group A, 5% had significant K-L grade progression and 10% had severe joint space constriction. Of the patients in Group B, 80% had significant K-L grade progression and 25% had severe joint space constriction. Meniscal repair had considerably superior outcomes for radiologic parameters than conservative care (P < 0.01) when we examined the final results of Groups A and B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MMRT repair group had better functional and radiological outcome than the conservative treatment group. Although treatment did not entirely stop the advancement of arthrosis, meniscal repair decreased the rate of arthritic changes when compared to the conservative group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"14 12","pages":"223-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i12.5080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To sustain hoop stress, prevent extrusion, and maintaining the function of the meniscus, the posterior root attachment point of the medial meniscus is essential. The purpose of this study is to determine the functional and radiological outcome of conservative therapy and meniscal repair for medial meniscal root tears.

Materials and methods: Prospective evaluations were performed on forty individuals who confirmed a diagnosis of Medial meniscus root tear (MMRT). Among the 40 patients, 20 underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair and 20 underwent conservative management and followed up a period of 2 years. Functional outcome between two groups was measured using Tegner Lysholm score and IKDC score. Radiological outcome was measured using X-rays (medial joint space width, joint space narrowing, K-L grade).

Results: Both group showed improvement in Lysholm score and IKDC. When comparing the clinical outcomes between both the groups, Group A showed significantly better outcome (P = 0.02). About 60% of patients in Group A and all patients in Group B showed K-L grade progression. Of the patients in Group A, 5% had significant K-L grade progression and 10% had severe joint space constriction. Of the patients in Group B, 80% had significant K-L grade progression and 25% had severe joint space constriction. Meniscal repair had considerably superior outcomes for radiologic parameters than conservative care (P < 0.01) when we examined the final results of Groups A and B.

Conclusion: The MMRT repair group had better functional and radiological outcome than the conservative treatment group. Although treatment did not entirely stop the advancement of arthrosis, meniscal repair decreased the rate of arthritic changes when compared to the conservative group.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信