Care homes and primary care in England working together: A multi-method qualitative study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Krystal Warmoth, Alex Aylward, Claire Goodman
{"title":"Care homes and primary care in England working together: A multi-method qualitative study.","authors":"Krystal Warmoth, Alex Aylward, Claire Goodman","doi":"10.1177/13558196241306607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In England, most long-term care for older people with complex health care needs is provided by private care homes. They rely on primary care to provide medical care and access to specialist health care services. This study explored the working relationships between care homes and primary care in one region in England to inform a theory of change for achieving improved relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a multi-method qualitative study using appreciative inquiry. We thematically analysed data from 33 survey responses, 15 interviews, and eight workshops with care home and primary care staff, family carers, and other community specialists to populate the theory of change. A patient and public involvement representative supported data collection, analysis, and write-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants described activities that encouraged role understanding, communication, and learning together benefitting staff, relationships, and quality of services. The lessons and experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic had shaped participants' understanding of what is required to sustain cross-sector collaboration. Key inputs included time, staff, and funding to facilitate learning how to work together effectively, as well as the capacity to adapt to diverse care settings and address the complex, individual needs of care home residents. Participants noted the few opportunities they had to share their learning and discuss best practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The theory of change identified different dimensions of good practice, providing insight into areas for action to inform service design and practice. Ongoing organisational changes should consider what is already working well and build on these achievements to enable positive care home and primary care working relationships and so foster high quality care and equitable access to services.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196241306607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241306607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In England, most long-term care for older people with complex health care needs is provided by private care homes. They rely on primary care to provide medical care and access to specialist health care services. This study explored the working relationships between care homes and primary care in one region in England to inform a theory of change for achieving improved relationships.

Methods: We carried out a multi-method qualitative study using appreciative inquiry. We thematically analysed data from 33 survey responses, 15 interviews, and eight workshops with care home and primary care staff, family carers, and other community specialists to populate the theory of change. A patient and public involvement representative supported data collection, analysis, and write-up.

Results: Study participants described activities that encouraged role understanding, communication, and learning together benefitting staff, relationships, and quality of services. The lessons and experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic had shaped participants' understanding of what is required to sustain cross-sector collaboration. Key inputs included time, staff, and funding to facilitate learning how to work together effectively, as well as the capacity to adapt to diverse care settings and address the complex, individual needs of care home residents. Participants noted the few opportunities they had to share their learning and discuss best practice.

Conclusion: The theory of change identified different dimensions of good practice, providing insight into areas for action to inform service design and practice. Ongoing organisational changes should consider what is already working well and build on these achievements to enable positive care home and primary care working relationships and so foster high quality care and equitable access to services.

护理院和初级保健在英格兰一起工作:一项多方法定性研究。
目的:在英格兰,大多数有复杂医疗保健需求的老年人的长期护理是由私人护理院提供的。他们依靠初级保健来提供医疗保健和获得专科保健服务。本研究探讨了护理院和初级保健之间的工作关系,在英格兰的一个地区,告知实现改善关系的变化理论。方法:采用欣赏式探究法进行多方法定性研究。我们从33个调查回复、15个访谈和8个与护理院和初级护理人员、家庭护理人员和其他社区专家的研讨会中对数据进行了主题分析,以充实变革理论。患者和公众参与代表支持数据收集、分析和记录。结果:研究参与者描述了鼓励角色理解、沟通和共同学习的活动,使员工、关系和服务质量受益。2019冠状病毒病大流行的教训和经验影响了与会者对维持跨部门合作所需条件的理解。主要投入包括时间、人员和资金,以促进学习如何有效地合作,以及适应不同护理环境和解决养老院居民复杂的个人需求的能力。与会者指出,他们很少有机会分享自己的学习成果和讨论最佳实践。结论:变革理论确定了良好实践的不同维度,为服务设计和实践提供了行动领域的洞察力。正在进行的组织变革应考虑哪些方面已经发挥了良好的作用,并在这些成就的基础上建立积极的养老院和初级保健工作关系,从而促进高质量的护理和公平获得服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信