Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: An Observational Cohort Study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1200/PO-24-00407
Salma Shickh, Chloe Mighton, Marc Clausen, Jordan Sam, Daena Hirjikaka, Emma Reble, Tracy Graham, Seema Panchal, Andrea Eisen, Christine Elser, Kasmintan A Schrader, Nancy N Baxter, Andreas Laupacis, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Raymond H Kim, Yvonne Bombard
{"title":"Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: An Observational Cohort Study.","authors":"Salma Shickh, Chloe Mighton, Marc Clausen, Jordan Sam, Daena Hirjikaka, Emma Reble, Tracy Graham, Seema Panchal, Andrea Eisen, Christine Elser, Kasmintan A Schrader, Nancy N Baxter, Andreas Laupacis, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Raymond H Kim, Yvonne Bombard","doi":"10.1200/PO-24-00407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used to improve diagnoses and inform targeted therapies. GS can also be used to identify the 10% of cancer patients with an underlying hereditary cancer syndrome (HCS), who can benefit from surveillance and preventive surgery that reduce morbidity/mortality. However, the evidence on clinical utility of GS for HCS is limited: we aimed to fill this gap by assessing yield of all cancer results and associated recommendations for patients undergoing GS for HCS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational chart review and survey were conducted for cancer patients with previous uninformative cancer gene panel results, who received GS as part of the Incidental Genomics Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03597165). Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics and clinical history. Proportions were calculated to compare frequencies of result types and recommendations made and followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 276 patients were eligible and included. Participants were mostly female (n = 240), European (n = 158), and with breast cancer history (n = 168). Yield: 25 patients (9.1%) received ≥1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, 246 (89%) received ≥1 variant of uncertain significance (VUS), and 27 (10%) were negative. Most pathogenic variants (20/26) were in low/moderate cancer risk genes. The mean number of VUS was 2.7/patient and higher in non-Europeans versus Europeans (3.5 <i>v</i> 2.5, <i>P</i> < .05). Recommendations: Pathogenic variants triggered 100 recommendations in 21/25 patients; most were for genetic counseling, communication to relatives, and cascade testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GS provided a modest increase in utility after first-tier cancer gene panels, at the cost of a high frequency of uncertain results. Furthermore, most positives were low/moderate cancer risk results that did not have corresponding evidence-based, management guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400407"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used to improve diagnoses and inform targeted therapies. GS can also be used to identify the 10% of cancer patients with an underlying hereditary cancer syndrome (HCS), who can benefit from surveillance and preventive surgery that reduce morbidity/mortality. However, the evidence on clinical utility of GS for HCS is limited: we aimed to fill this gap by assessing yield of all cancer results and associated recommendations for patients undergoing GS for HCS.

Materials and methods: An observational chart review and survey were conducted for cancer patients with previous uninformative cancer gene panel results, who received GS as part of the Incidental Genomics Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03597165). Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics and clinical history. Proportions were calculated to compare frequencies of result types and recommendations made and followed.

Results: A total of 276 patients were eligible and included. Participants were mostly female (n = 240), European (n = 158), and with breast cancer history (n = 168). Yield: 25 patients (9.1%) received ≥1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, 246 (89%) received ≥1 variant of uncertain significance (VUS), and 27 (10%) were negative. Most pathogenic variants (20/26) were in low/moderate cancer risk genes. The mean number of VUS was 2.7/patient and higher in non-Europeans versus Europeans (3.5 v 2.5, P < .05). Recommendations: Pathogenic variants triggered 100 recommendations in 21/25 patients; most were for genetic counseling, communication to relatives, and cascade testing.

Conclusion: GS provided a modest increase in utility after first-tier cancer gene panels, at the cost of a high frequency of uncertain results. Furthermore, most positives were low/moderate cancer risk results that did not have corresponding evidence-based, management guidelines.

遗传癌症综合征基因组测序的临床应用:一项观察性队列研究。
目的:基因组测序(GS)越来越多地用于改善诊断和告知靶向治疗。GS还可用于识别10%患有潜在遗传性癌症综合征(HCS)的癌症患者,这些患者可从监测和预防性手术中获益,从而降低发病率/死亡率。然而,关于GS治疗HCS的临床应用的证据是有限的:我们旨在通过评估所有癌症结果的产出率和接受GS治疗HCS患者的相关建议来填补这一空白。材料和方法:对先前癌症基因小组结果不明确的癌症患者进行观察图回顾和调查,这些患者作为附带基因组学试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03597165)的一部分接受了GS。描述性统计用于描述人口统计学和临床病史。计算比例来比较结果类型的频率以及提出和遵循的建议。结果:共有276例患者入选。参与者主要是女性(n = 240),欧洲人(n = 158),有乳腺癌病史(n = 168)。结果:≥1个致病/可能致病变异25例(9.1%),≥1个不确定意义变异(VUS) 246例(89%),27例(10%)阴性。大多数致病变异(20/26)位于低/中度癌症风险基因。VUS的平均数量为2.7/例,非欧洲人高于欧洲人(3.5 vs 2.5, P < 0.05)。建议:致病变异在21/25的患者中触发了100条建议;大多数是用于遗传咨询、与亲属沟通和级联检测。结论:GS在一线癌症基因检测后提供了适度的效用增加,但代价是结果不确定的频率很高。此外,大多数阳性结果为低/中度癌症风险结果,没有相应的循证管理指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信