{"title":"Achieving reduced radiation exposure with maintained fluoroscopy effectiveness using ultralow-dose settings in cryoballoon ablation","authors":"Takashi Kaneshiro M.D., Sadahiro Murota M.D., Takeshi Nehashi M.D., Minoru Nodera M.D., Shinya Yamada M.D., Masamitsu Ikeda R.T., Yasuchika Takeishi M.D.","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Optimization of fluoroscopic image quality for reducing radiation exposure in cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) has not yet been fully investigated. Therefore, we tried to compare the radiation doses among three different X-ray system settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Consecutive 148 patients scheduled for their first CB-PVI were prospectively enrolled: low dose with the use of an anti-scatter grid for the first 51 patients (LD + G group), low dose without an anti-scatter grid for the subsequent 46 patients (LD-G group), and ultralow dose (ULD group) with an anti-scatter grid for the remaining 51 patients. We compared the radiation doses required to complete CB-PVI procedures among the groups. There were 27 patients for whom CB-PVI was performed without cine acquisition, but with fluoroscopy only, and the radiation doses were also compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median procedure time and fluoroscopy time were 119 and 35.5 min, respectively, with no significant differences among the groups. The median cumulative air Kerma (AK) decreased in both the LD-G group (71.8 mGy, <i>p</i> < .001) and the ULD group (73.0 mGy, <i>p</i> < .001), compared to the LD + G group (145.0 mGy). Among 27 patients who underwent CB-PVI without cine acquisition, the median cumulative AK further decreased in both the LD-G group (31.4 mGy, <i>p</i> < .05) and the ULD group (22.7 mGy, <i>p</i> < .01), compared to the LD + G group (64.6 mGy).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Using an ULD X-ray setting and avoiding cine acquisition, we can reduce radiation exposure, while ensuring the necessary fluoroscopy time for the CB-PVI procedure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"40 6","pages":"1400-1407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims
Optimization of fluoroscopic image quality for reducing radiation exposure in cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) has not yet been fully investigated. Therefore, we tried to compare the radiation doses among three different X-ray system settings.
Methods
Consecutive 148 patients scheduled for their first CB-PVI were prospectively enrolled: low dose with the use of an anti-scatter grid for the first 51 patients (LD + G group), low dose without an anti-scatter grid for the subsequent 46 patients (LD-G group), and ultralow dose (ULD group) with an anti-scatter grid for the remaining 51 patients. We compared the radiation doses required to complete CB-PVI procedures among the groups. There were 27 patients for whom CB-PVI was performed without cine acquisition, but with fluoroscopy only, and the radiation doses were also compared.
Results
The median procedure time and fluoroscopy time were 119 and 35.5 min, respectively, with no significant differences among the groups. The median cumulative air Kerma (AK) decreased in both the LD-G group (71.8 mGy, p < .001) and the ULD group (73.0 mGy, p < .001), compared to the LD + G group (145.0 mGy). Among 27 patients who underwent CB-PVI without cine acquisition, the median cumulative AK further decreased in both the LD-G group (31.4 mGy, p < .05) and the ULD group (22.7 mGy, p < .01), compared to the LD + G group (64.6 mGy).
Conclusion
Using an ULD X-ray setting and avoiding cine acquisition, we can reduce radiation exposure, while ensuring the necessary fluoroscopy time for the CB-PVI procedure.
背景与目的:在低温球囊肺静脉隔离术(CB-PVI)中,减少辐射暴露的透视图像质量优化尚未得到充分的研究。因此,我们试图比较三种不同x射线系统设置下的辐射剂量。方法:连续148例计划进行首次CB-PVI的患者被前瞻性纳入:前51例患者低剂量使用抗散射网格(LD + G组),随后46例患者低剂量不使用抗散射网格(LD-G组),其余51例患者超低剂量(ULD组)使用抗散射网格。我们比较了各组间完成CB-PVI手术所需的辐射剂量。27例患者行CB-PVI检查,未行胶片采集,仅行透视检查,并比较辐射剂量。结果:中位手术时间和透视时间分别为119和35.5 min,组间差异无统计学意义。LD-G组中位累积空气Kerma (AK)均降低(71.8 mGy, p p p p p)。结论:使用ULD x线设置和避免电影采集,我们可以减少辐射暴露,同时确保CB-PVI手术所需的透视时间。