Comparison of different maximal isometric strength of lower limb muscle groups in predicting fall-risk among older persons.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Rutwa Pandya Kulinkumar, Faris Bani Yasin, Om Prakash Singh, Fuad A Abdulla, Murugananthan Balaganapathy, Jagannathan Madhanagopal
{"title":"Comparison of different maximal isometric strength of lower limb muscle groups in predicting fall-risk among older persons.","authors":"Rutwa Pandya Kulinkumar, Faris Bani Yasin, Om Prakash Singh, Fuad A Abdulla, Murugananthan Balaganapathy, Jagannathan Madhanagopal","doi":"10.3233/BMR-240142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMany independent studies have investigated the role of normalized maximal voluntary isometric strength (MVIS) of lower limb muscle groups (MVISLLMG) by body weight and summed knee and ankle muscle strength in predicting the risk of falling among older persons. However, it is unknown which MVISLLMG is better at predicting the fall risk.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare different MVISLLMG in predicting fall-risk among older persons against the reference standard (history of falls).MethodsThis study had a cross-sectional retrospective diagnostic research design. 47 fallers and 93 non-fallers were recruited from Anand district, Gujarat, India, using sequential sampling. The MVISLLMG was measured with a microFET<sup>®</sup>2 hand-held dynamometer. Following feature selection, four machine learning (ML) models (Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Navie Bayes (NB), and Kernel Support Vector Machines (SVM)), were utilized to assess the diagnostic characteristics of every measured MVISLLMG in comparison to the reference standard. The best ML model was chosen based on the highest diagnostic performance in predicting fall-risk.ResultsAmong the ML models, the NB revealed that the non-normalized summed MVIS of knee and ankle muscle (Sensitivity <i>(Se)</i><math><mo>=</mo></math> 87%, Specificity (<i>Sp)</i><math><mo>=</mo></math> 91%, Accuracy (<i>Ac)</i><math><mo>=</mo></math> 90%, Precision (<i>Pr)</i><math><mo>=</mo></math> 84%) has the best diagnostic characteristics in fall-risk prediction against the fall history, followed by non-normalized MVIS of hip abductor, knee extensor, plantar flexor, and dorsiflexor, normalized summed MVIS of hip sagittal and knee muscle, and normalized MVIS of hip sagittal and frontal, knee, and plantar flexor.ConclusionThese results suggest that non-normalized summed MVIS of knee and ankle muscles is the better fall predictor in older persons compared to other index measures. This finding may assist clinicians in playing a better role in selecting suitable MVISLLMG data for fall risk assessment and predicting falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"473-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-240142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMany independent studies have investigated the role of normalized maximal voluntary isometric strength (MVIS) of lower limb muscle groups (MVISLLMG) by body weight and summed knee and ankle muscle strength in predicting the risk of falling among older persons. However, it is unknown which MVISLLMG is better at predicting the fall risk.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare different MVISLLMG in predicting fall-risk among older persons against the reference standard (history of falls).MethodsThis study had a cross-sectional retrospective diagnostic research design. 47 fallers and 93 non-fallers were recruited from Anand district, Gujarat, India, using sequential sampling. The MVISLLMG was measured with a microFET®2 hand-held dynamometer. Following feature selection, four machine learning (ML) models (Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Navie Bayes (NB), and Kernel Support Vector Machines (SVM)), were utilized to assess the diagnostic characteristics of every measured MVISLLMG in comparison to the reference standard. The best ML model was chosen based on the highest diagnostic performance in predicting fall-risk.ResultsAmong the ML models, the NB revealed that the non-normalized summed MVIS of knee and ankle muscle (Sensitivity (Se)= 87%, Specificity (Sp)= 91%, Accuracy (Ac)= 90%, Precision (Pr)= 84%) has the best diagnostic characteristics in fall-risk prediction against the fall history, followed by non-normalized MVIS of hip abductor, knee extensor, plantar flexor, and dorsiflexor, normalized summed MVIS of hip sagittal and knee muscle, and normalized MVIS of hip sagittal and frontal, knee, and plantar flexor.ConclusionThese results suggest that non-normalized summed MVIS of knee and ankle muscles is the better fall predictor in older persons compared to other index measures. This finding may assist clinicians in playing a better role in selecting suitable MVISLLMG data for fall risk assessment and predicting falls.

不同下肢肌群最大等长力量预测老年人跌倒风险的比较。
背景:许多独立研究调查了标准化最大自主等长力量(MVIS)下肢肌肉群(MVISLLMG)的体重和膝关节和踝关节肌肉力量在预测老年人跌倒风险中的作用。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种MVISLLMG在预测跌倒风险方面更好。目的:本研究旨在比较不同MVISLLMG与参考标准(跌倒史)在预测老年人跌倒风险方面的差异。方法:本研究采用横断面回顾性诊断研究设计。采用顺序抽样方法,从印度古吉拉特邦阿南德地区招募了47名跌倒者和93名非跌倒者。MVISLLMG采用microFET®2手持式测功机进行测量。在特征选择之后,使用四种机器学习(ML)模型(随机森林(RF), k近邻(KNN),纳维贝叶斯(NB)和核支持向量机(SVM))来评估每个测量的MVISLLMG的诊断特征,并与参考标准进行比较。根据预测跌倒风险的最高诊断性能选择最佳ML模型。结果:在ML模型中,NB显示膝关节和踝关节肌肉非归一化MVIS (Sensitivity (Se)= 87%, Specificity (Sp)= 91%, Accuracy (Ac)= 90%, Precision (Pr)= 84%)在预测跌倒风险方面具有最好的诊断特征,其次是髋关节外展肌、膝关节伸肌、足底屈肌和背屈肌的非归一化MVIS,髋矢状肌和膝关节的归一化MVIS,髋矢状肌和额部、膝关节的归一化MVIS。还有足底屈肌。结论:这些结果表明,与其他指标相比,膝关节和踝关节肌肉的非标准化总MVIS是老年人更好的跌倒预测指标。这一发现可以帮助临床医生更好地选择合适的MVISLLMG数据进行跌倒风险评估和预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信