The Certification Ranking of Stroke Treatment Centers Is Unclear to the General Public.

Michael V Preciado, Jennifer E Wilson, Jose Alejandro-White, Maria Denbow, DaiWai M Olson
{"title":"The Certification Ranking of Stroke Treatment Centers Is Unclear to the General Public.","authors":"Michael V Preciado, Jennifer E Wilson, Jose Alejandro-White, Maria Denbow, DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Certified stroke treatment centers are classified based on their available resources to treat stroke including an Acute Stroke Ready Hospital (ASRH), a primary stroke center (PSC), a Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Center (TCSC), and comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs). These hospitals all provide varying levels of care with CSCs being the most able to treat all types and complexities of stroke. This undergraduate nursing-led study explored the public's preference for treatment at different certified stroke treatment centers. METHODS: This study was a prospective nonrandomized observational survey of English-speaking adults at a plasma donation center in the Southwest United States. Subjects completed a 2-minute survey asking whether they would drive to the hospital or call 911 during a suspected stroke, and at which type of hospital they would prefer to be treated. RESULTS: Of 249 respondents, 204 (81.9%) indicated that they would call 911 for hospital transport, and 45 (18.1%) would drive their family member to a hospital. Most respondents (95/248, 38.3%) would prefer treatment at a PSC, 90 (36.3%) preferred an ASRH, 52 (21.0%) preferred a CSC, and 11 (4.4%) preferred a TCSC. There was no association between transportation preference and hospital preference dichotomized as CSC or PSC versus ASRH or TCSC (χ 2 = 0.021, P = .885), nor CSC versus other (χ 2 = 0.944, P = .331). CONCLUSION : Most respondents did not select CSC as the preferred treatment site, and 1 in 5 would drive rather than call 911. This indicates a knowledge gap regarding stroke center classification that warrants increased education.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Certified stroke treatment centers are classified based on their available resources to treat stroke including an Acute Stroke Ready Hospital (ASRH), a primary stroke center (PSC), a Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Center (TCSC), and comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs). These hospitals all provide varying levels of care with CSCs being the most able to treat all types and complexities of stroke. This undergraduate nursing-led study explored the public's preference for treatment at different certified stroke treatment centers. METHODS: This study was a prospective nonrandomized observational survey of English-speaking adults at a plasma donation center in the Southwest United States. Subjects completed a 2-minute survey asking whether they would drive to the hospital or call 911 during a suspected stroke, and at which type of hospital they would prefer to be treated. RESULTS: Of 249 respondents, 204 (81.9%) indicated that they would call 911 for hospital transport, and 45 (18.1%) would drive their family member to a hospital. Most respondents (95/248, 38.3%) would prefer treatment at a PSC, 90 (36.3%) preferred an ASRH, 52 (21.0%) preferred a CSC, and 11 (4.4%) preferred a TCSC. There was no association between transportation preference and hospital preference dichotomized as CSC or PSC versus ASRH or TCSC (χ 2 = 0.021, P = .885), nor CSC versus other (χ 2 = 0.944, P = .331). CONCLUSION : Most respondents did not select CSC as the preferred treatment site, and 1 in 5 would drive rather than call 911. This indicates a knowledge gap regarding stroke center classification that warrants increased education.

脑卒中治疗中心认证排名不明确。
背景:经认证的脑卒中治疗中心根据其治疗脑卒中的可用资源进行分类,包括急性脑卒中准备医院(ASRH)、初级脑卒中中心(PSC)、具有血栓切除术能力的脑卒中中心(TCSC)和综合脑卒中中心(CSCs)。这些医院都提供不同程度的护理,csc最能治疗所有类型和复杂性的中风。本研究以本科生护理为主导,探讨公众对不同脑卒中治疗中心的治疗偏好。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性非随机观察性调查,对象为美国西南部一家血浆捐献中心的英语成年人。受试者完成了一项2分钟的调查,询问他们在怀疑中风时是否会开车去医院或拨打911,以及他们希望在哪种类型的医院接受治疗。结果:249名受访者中,204名(81.9%)表示会拨打911要求送医,45名(18.1%)表示会开车送家人去医院。大多数受访者(95/248,38.3%)倾向于PSC治疗,90人(36.3%)倾向于ASRH, 52人(21.0%)倾向于CSC, 11人(4.4%)倾向于TCSC。交通偏好与医院偏好之间没有相关性,分为CSC或PSC与ASRH或TCSC (χ2 = 0.021, P = .885), CSC与其他(χ2 = 0.944, P = .331)。结论:大多数受访者不选择CSC作为首选治疗地点,五分之一的人宁愿开车而不愿拨打911。这表明关于中风中心分类的知识差距需要加强教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信