Low birthweight rate differences associated with distinct perinatal staffing mixes at federally funded health centers.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae113
Paula M Kett, Grace A Guenther, Marieke S van Eijk, Davis G Patterson, Bianca K Frogner
{"title":"Low birthweight rate differences associated with distinct perinatal staffing mixes at federally funded health centers.","authors":"Paula M Kett, Grace A Guenther, Marieke S van Eijk, Davis G Patterson, Bianca K Frogner","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health centers (sometimes referred to as \"federally qualified health centers\") can play an important role in addressing perinatal inequities. However, there is limited information on how different staffing models in health centers contribute to perinatal outcomes, including the availability of certified nurse midwives (CNMs). Using 2011-2021 Uniform Data System files, we examined 4 staffing models in 1385 health centers: those with no CNMs or obstetricians-gynecologists (OBs) (\"non-CNM/OB\"), CNM-only, OB-only, and both CNMs and OBs (\"CNM/OB\"). We predicted adjusted low birthweight (LBW) rates across these staffing types using a generalized linear model approach, adjusting for both time and center fixed effects as well as relevant patient, staffing, organizational, and community characteristics. We found that CNM-only health centers had the lowest LBW rates across all staffing models (7.6%) and non-CNM/OB centers had the highest (10.1%). Among Black births, LBW rates ranged from 10.1% (CNM-only) to 13.5% (non-CNM/OB). Findings indicate the importance of building and supporting the CNM workforce and ensuring adequate staffing at health centers, particularly as part of a comprehensive approach to addressing inequities in perinatal outcomes including addressing the scope of practice of CNMs, as more CNM-staff health centers were in areas with independent scope of practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 12","pages":"qxae113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health centers (sometimes referred to as "federally qualified health centers") can play an important role in addressing perinatal inequities. However, there is limited information on how different staffing models in health centers contribute to perinatal outcomes, including the availability of certified nurse midwives (CNMs). Using 2011-2021 Uniform Data System files, we examined 4 staffing models in 1385 health centers: those with no CNMs or obstetricians-gynecologists (OBs) ("non-CNM/OB"), CNM-only, OB-only, and both CNMs and OBs ("CNM/OB"). We predicted adjusted low birthweight (LBW) rates across these staffing types using a generalized linear model approach, adjusting for both time and center fixed effects as well as relevant patient, staffing, organizational, and community characteristics. We found that CNM-only health centers had the lowest LBW rates across all staffing models (7.6%) and non-CNM/OB centers had the highest (10.1%). Among Black births, LBW rates ranged from 10.1% (CNM-only) to 13.5% (non-CNM/OB). Findings indicate the importance of building and supporting the CNM workforce and ensuring adequate staffing at health centers, particularly as part of a comprehensive approach to addressing inequities in perinatal outcomes including addressing the scope of practice of CNMs, as more CNM-staff health centers were in areas with independent scope of practice.

低出生体重率差异与联邦资助的保健中心不同的围产期人员组合有关。
保健中心(有时被称为“联邦合格保健中心”)可以在解决围产期不平等问题方面发挥重要作用。然而,关于保健中心不同的人员配置模式如何影响围产期结果的信息有限,包括注册护士助产士(CNMs)的可用性。使用2011-2021年统一数据系统文件,我们检查了1385个医疗中心的4种人员配置模式:没有CNM或妇产科医生(“非CNM/OB”),只有CNM,只有OB, CNM和OB都有(“CNM/OB”)。我们使用广义线性模型方法预测了这些人员类型的调整后低出生体重(LBW)率,调整了时间和中心固定效应以及相关的患者、人员、组织和社区特征。我们发现,在所有人员配备模式中,只有cnm的医疗中心的低体重率最低(7.6%),而非cnm /OB中心的低体重率最高(10.1%)。在黑人出生中,低体重率从10.1%(纯黑人)到13.5%(非黑人/OB)不等。调查结果表明,建设和支持CNM工作队伍并确保保健中心配备足够的人员非常重要,特别是作为解决围产期结果不平等问题的综合办法的一部分,包括解决CNM的实践范围问题,因为更多的CNM工作人员保健中心位于具有独立实践范围的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信