Afraid of the dentist? There's an app for that: Development and usability testing of a cognitive behavior therapy-based mobile app.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000690
Kelly A Daly, Kiara A Diaz-Gutierrez, Armon Beheshtian, Richard E Heyman, Amy M Smith Slep, Mark S Wolff
{"title":"Afraid of the dentist? There's an app for that: Development and usability testing of a cognitive behavior therapy-based mobile app.","authors":"Kelly A Daly, Kiara A Diaz-Gutierrez, Armon Beheshtian, Richard E Heyman, Amy M Smith Slep, Mark S Wolff","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although several brief cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-based treatments for dental fear have proven efficacious, these interventions remain largely unavailable outside of the specialty clinics in which they were developed. Leveraging technology, we sought to increase access to treatment for individuals with dental fear through the development of a mobile application (Dental FearLess).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To assess the resonance of our app as an avenue for dental fear treatment, we conducted a study assessing the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of the beta app. Participants with moderate to severe dental fear (N = 80) completed the app and reported on the perceived usability of the mobile interface (Systems Usability Scale, SUS; α = .82) and credibility of the intervention (Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire, CEQ; α = .88). A sub-sample of participants naïve to the app (n = 10) completed the app during a think-aloud procedure, sharing their candid thoughts and reactions while using the app, prior to reporting on usability and credibility metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall usability (M = 78.5, SD = 17.7) and credibility (M = 21.7, SD = 5.5) of the beta version of the app were good. The think-aloud data further corroborated the app's acceptability, while highlighting several areas for user improvement (i.e., aesthetics, navigation, engagement).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Usability and acceptability results are promising for the viability of an accessible, feasible, self-administered intervention for dental fear. Refinements made based on user feedback have produced a clinical-trial-ready mobile application. App refinement decisions, informed by user feedback, are representative of the larger literature-that is, of the ubiquitous negotiations m-health developers must make across treatment fidelity, usability, and engagement. Implications for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 12","pages":"e0000690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although several brief cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-based treatments for dental fear have proven efficacious, these interventions remain largely unavailable outside of the specialty clinics in which they were developed. Leveraging technology, we sought to increase access to treatment for individuals with dental fear through the development of a mobile application (Dental FearLess).

Materials and methods: To assess the resonance of our app as an avenue for dental fear treatment, we conducted a study assessing the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of the beta app. Participants with moderate to severe dental fear (N = 80) completed the app and reported on the perceived usability of the mobile interface (Systems Usability Scale, SUS; α = .82) and credibility of the intervention (Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire, CEQ; α = .88). A sub-sample of participants naïve to the app (n = 10) completed the app during a think-aloud procedure, sharing their candid thoughts and reactions while using the app, prior to reporting on usability and credibility metrics.

Results: Overall usability (M = 78.5, SD = 17.7) and credibility (M = 21.7, SD = 5.5) of the beta version of the app were good. The think-aloud data further corroborated the app's acceptability, while highlighting several areas for user improvement (i.e., aesthetics, navigation, engagement).

Conclusions: Usability and acceptability results are promising for the viability of an accessible, feasible, self-administered intervention for dental fear. Refinements made based on user feedback have produced a clinical-trial-ready mobile application. App refinement decisions, informed by user feedback, are representative of the larger literature-that is, of the ubiquitous negotiations m-health developers must make across treatment fidelity, usability, and engagement. Implications for future research are discussed.

害怕看牙医?有一个应用程序:开发和可用性测试基于认知行为治疗的移动应用程序。
目的:尽管一些基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的治疗牙科恐惧的方法已被证明是有效的,但这些干预措施在其开发的专业诊所之外仍然很大程度上不可用。利用技术,我们试图通过开发一个移动应用程序(dental FearLess)来增加患有牙科恐惧症的个人获得治疗的机会。材料和方法:为了评估我们的应用程序作为牙科恐惧治疗途径的共鸣,我们进行了一项研究,评估了测试应用程序的可用性、可行性和可接受性。患有中度至重度牙科恐惧的参与者(N = 80)完成了应用程序,并报告了移动界面的感知可用性(系统可用性量表,SUS;α = 0.82)和干预的可信度(可信度和期望问卷,CEQ;α = 0.88)。应用程序参与者的子样本naïve (n = 10)在思考过程中完成了应用程序,在使用应用程序时分享了他们坦率的想法和反应,然后报告可用性和可信度指标。结果:应用程序测试版的总体可用性(M = 78.5, SD = 17.7)和可信度(M = 21.7, SD = 5.5)较好。有声思考数据进一步证实了应用程序的可接受性,同时强调了用户改进的几个领域(即美学,导航,参与度)。结论:可用性和可接受性的结果是有希望的可行性,可访问的,可行的,自我管理的牙科恐惧干预。基于用户反馈的改进已经产生了一个临床试验就绪的移动应用程序。基于用户反馈的应用程序优化决策代表了更广泛的文献——也就是说,移动医疗开发者必须在治疗保真度、可用性和参与度方面进行无处不在的谈判。讨论了对未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信