David Tess, Makayla Harrison, Jian Lin, Rui Li, Li Di
{"title":"Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions for Highly Plasma Protein Bound Compounds.","authors":"David Tess, Makayla Harrison, Jian Lin, Rui Li, Li Di","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00987-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDI) from in vitro data is important, as it provides insights on clinical DDI risk and study design. Historically, the lower limit of plasma fraction unbound (f<sub>u,p</sub>) is set at 1% for DDI prediction of highly bound compounds by the regulatory agencies due to the uncertainty of the f<sub>u,p</sub> measurements. This leads to high false positive DDI predictions for highly bound compounds. The recently published ICH M12 DDI guideline allows the use of experimental f<sub>u,p</sub> for DDI prediction of highly bound compounds. To further build confidence in DDI prediction of highly bound compounds using experimental f<sub>u,p</sub> values, we evaluated a set of drugs with f<sub>u,p</sub> < 1% and clinical DDI > 20% using both basic and mechanistic static models. All the compounds evaluated were flagged for DDI risk with the mechanistic model using experimental f<sub>u,p</sub> values. There was no false negative DDI prediction. Similarly, using the basic model, the DDI risk of all the compounds was identified except for CYP2D6 inhibition of almorexant. The totality of the data demonstrates that the DDI potential of highly bound compounds can be predicted accurately when actual protein binding numbers are measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00987-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDI) from in vitro data is important, as it provides insights on clinical DDI risk and study design. Historically, the lower limit of plasma fraction unbound (fu,p) is set at 1% for DDI prediction of highly bound compounds by the regulatory agencies due to the uncertainty of the fu,p measurements. This leads to high false positive DDI predictions for highly bound compounds. The recently published ICH M12 DDI guideline allows the use of experimental fu,p for DDI prediction of highly bound compounds. To further build confidence in DDI prediction of highly bound compounds using experimental fu,p values, we evaluated a set of drugs with fu,p < 1% and clinical DDI > 20% using both basic and mechanistic static models. All the compounds evaluated were flagged for DDI risk with the mechanistic model using experimental fu,p values. There was no false negative DDI prediction. Similarly, using the basic model, the DDI risk of all the compounds was identified except for CYP2D6 inhibition of almorexant. The totality of the data demonstrates that the DDI potential of highly bound compounds can be predicted accurately when actual protein binding numbers are measured.
期刊介绍:
The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including:
· Drug Design and Discovery
· Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
· Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery
· Metabolism and Transport
· Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics
· Translational Research
· Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes
· Regulatory Science
We invite submissions under the following article types:
· Original Research Articles
· Reviews and Mini-reviews
· White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials
· Meeting Reports
· Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications
· Regulatory Notes
· Tutorials
· Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences
In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.