An Analysis of Junctional Tourniquet Use Within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry.

Q3 Medicine
Hailey B Reneau, Brit J Long, Julie A Rizzo, Andrew D Fisher, Michael D April, Steven G Schauer
{"title":"An Analysis of Junctional Tourniquet Use Within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry.","authors":"Hailey B Reneau, Brit J Long, Julie A Rizzo, Andrew D Fisher, Michael D April, Steven G Schauer","doi":"10.55460/NDC5-J2LU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Junctional hemorrhage is a leading cause of battlefield death. Multiple FDA-approved junctional tourniquet (JTQ) models demonstrate effective hemorrhage control in laboratory settings. However, there are few real-world use cases within the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) for casualties with documented JTQ application (2007-2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 48,301 encounters, 39 included JTQ placement. The most common injury mechanisms were explosives (23), followed by firearms (15). The most common (AIS >3) serious injury sites were the extremities (21), followed by the abdomen (4) and skin (4). Only one patient died. Of nine prehospital interventions, the most common were warming (21), limb tourniquet application (16), and intravenous fluid administration (11). The most common associated diagnoses were lower-extremity amputation (24), testis avulsion or amputation (11), pelvic fracture (9), and tympanic membrane rupture (9). The most common hospital procedures were a focused assessment with sonography in trauma (32), laparotomy (20), chest tube placement (13), fasciotomy (13), and arterial line placement (13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>JTQ application in the combat setting was rare. When it was performed, it was frequently in the polytrauma setting. Survival was high but DoDTR enrollment survival biases likely confounded this.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/NDC5-J2LU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Junctional hemorrhage is a leading cause of battlefield death. Multiple FDA-approved junctional tourniquet (JTQ) models demonstrate effective hemorrhage control in laboratory settings. However, there are few real-world use cases within the literature.

Methods: We analyzed the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) for casualties with documented JTQ application (2007-2023).

Results: Of 48,301 encounters, 39 included JTQ placement. The most common injury mechanisms were explosives (23), followed by firearms (15). The most common (AIS >3) serious injury sites were the extremities (21), followed by the abdomen (4) and skin (4). Only one patient died. Of nine prehospital interventions, the most common were warming (21), limb tourniquet application (16), and intravenous fluid administration (11). The most common associated diagnoses were lower-extremity amputation (24), testis avulsion or amputation (11), pelvic fracture (9), and tympanic membrane rupture (9). The most common hospital procedures were a focused assessment with sonography in trauma (32), laparotomy (20), chest tube placement (13), fasciotomy (13), and arterial line placement (13).

Conclusion: JTQ application in the combat setting was rare. When it was performed, it was frequently in the polytrauma setting. Survival was high but DoDTR enrollment survival biases likely confounded this.

美国国防部创伤登记处结缔组织止血带使用分析。
背景:结膜出血是战场死亡的主要原因。多种fda批准的结缔组织止血带(JTQ)模型在实验室环境中证明了有效的出血控制。然而,在文献中很少有真实的用例。方法:我们分析了国防部创伤登记处(DoDTR)记录的2007-2023年JTQ申请的伤亡情况。结果:在48301次接触中,39次包括JTQ安置。最常见的伤害机制是爆炸物(23),其次是火器(15)。最常见的严重损伤部位是四肢(21例),其次是腹部(4例)和皮肤(4例)。仅有1例患者死亡。在9项院前干预措施中,最常见的是加热(21例)、肢体止血带应用(16例)和静脉输液(11例)。最常见的相关诊断是下肢截肢(24例)、睾丸撕脱或截肢(11例)、骨盆骨折(9例)和鼓膜破裂(9例)。最常见的医院手术是创伤超声集中评估(32例)、剖腹手术(20例)、胸腔插管(13例)、筋膜切开术(13例)和动脉线置入(13例)。结论:JTQ在战斗环境中的应用较少。当它被执行时,它经常是在多重创伤的情况下。生存率很高,但DoDTR登记的生存率偏差可能混淆了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信