Number of Doses of Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis May Be Reduced in Cemented Primary Knee Arthroplasty Irrespective of Use of Antibiotic in the Cement: A Multiregistry-Based Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00140
Tesfaye H Leta, Richard N Chang, Anne Marie Fenstad, Stein Atle Lie, Stein Håkon L Lygre, Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Alma B Pedersen, Olav Lutro, Jinny Willis, Chris Frampton, Michael Wyatt, Serban Dragosloveanu, Andreea E Vorovenci, Dan Dragomirescu, Håvard Dale, Geir Hallan, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Heather A Prentice, Ove Furnes, Art Sedrakyan, Elizabeth W Paxton
{"title":"Number of Doses of Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis May Be Reduced in Cemented Primary Knee Arthroplasty Irrespective of Use of Antibiotic in the Cement: A Multiregistry-Based Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Tesfaye H Leta, Richard N Chang, Anne Marie Fenstad, Stein Atle Lie, Stein Håkon L Lygre, Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Alma B Pedersen, Olav Lutro, Jinny Willis, Chris Frampton, Michael Wyatt, Serban Dragosloveanu, Andreea E Vorovenci, Dan Dragomirescu, Håvard Dale, Geir Hallan, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Heather A Prentice, Ove Furnes, Art Sedrakyan, Elizabeth W Paxton","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) and antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is the accepted practice to reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary total knee arthroplasty (pTKA). However, practice varies internationally. This study's primary aim was to compare the risk of PJI revision after pTKA with ALBC + SAP vs. plain bone cement (PBC) + SAP, and the secondary aim was to assess whether the risk of PJI revision varies with the number of SAP doses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cohort of 289,926 pTKAs for osteoarthritis from arthroplasty registries in Denmark, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, and United States registered from 2010 to 2020. One-year revision for PJI following pTKA with ALBC + SAP vs. PBC + SAP, and single vs. multiple SAP doses was compared. We computed cumulative percent revision (1 minus Kaplan-Meier) using distributed analysis method and adjusted hazard rate ratios (HRRs) using Cox regression analyses within each registry. Advanced distributed meta-analysis was performed to summarize HRRs from all countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all pTKAs, 64.4% were performed with ALBC + SAP. Each registry reported a 1-year cumulative percent revision for PJI of <1.00% for both pTKAs with ALBC + SAP (0.34%-0.80%) and with PBC + SAP (0.54%-0.69%). The distributed meta-analysis showed HRR = 1.21; (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.87) for ALBC + SAP compared with PBC + SAP. Similar risk of PJI revision was observed between pTKAs with ALBC + single vs. multiple doses of SAP: 2 doses (0.95; 95% CI, 0.68-1.33), 3 doses (1.09; 95% CI, 0.64-1.87), and 4 doses (1.23; 95% CI, 0.69-2.21). Comparable results were found for the PBC + SAP group except for higher risk of PJI revision with 4 doses of SAP (2.74; 95% CI, 1.11-6.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ALBC and PBC entailed similar risk of PJI revision when patients received SAP in pTKA, regardless of number of SAP doses. ALBC or PBC used in combination with SAP in pTKAs, with one single preoperative dose of SAP may be sufficient without compromising the patient safety.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) and antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is the accepted practice to reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary total knee arthroplasty (pTKA). However, practice varies internationally. This study's primary aim was to compare the risk of PJI revision after pTKA with ALBC + SAP vs. plain bone cement (PBC) + SAP, and the secondary aim was to assess whether the risk of PJI revision varies with the number of SAP doses.

Methods: Cohort of 289,926 pTKAs for osteoarthritis from arthroplasty registries in Denmark, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, and United States registered from 2010 to 2020. One-year revision for PJI following pTKA with ALBC + SAP vs. PBC + SAP, and single vs. multiple SAP doses was compared. We computed cumulative percent revision (1 minus Kaplan-Meier) using distributed analysis method and adjusted hazard rate ratios (HRRs) using Cox regression analyses within each registry. Advanced distributed meta-analysis was performed to summarize HRRs from all countries.

Results: Among all pTKAs, 64.4% were performed with ALBC + SAP. Each registry reported a 1-year cumulative percent revision for PJI of <1.00% for both pTKAs with ALBC + SAP (0.34%-0.80%) and with PBC + SAP (0.54%-0.69%). The distributed meta-analysis showed HRR = 1.21; (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.87) for ALBC + SAP compared with PBC + SAP. Similar risk of PJI revision was observed between pTKAs with ALBC + single vs. multiple doses of SAP: 2 doses (0.95; 95% CI, 0.68-1.33), 3 doses (1.09; 95% CI, 0.64-1.87), and 4 doses (1.23; 95% CI, 0.69-2.21). Comparable results were found for the PBC + SAP group except for higher risk of PJI revision with 4 doses of SAP (2.74; 95% CI, 1.11-6.75).

Conclusions: ALBC and PBC entailed similar risk of PJI revision when patients received SAP in pTKA, regardless of number of SAP doses. ALBC or PBC used in combination with SAP in pTKAs, with one single preoperative dose of SAP may be sufficient without compromising the patient safety.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

一项基于多注册中心的荟萃分析表明,与骨水泥中抗生素的使用无关,骨水泥初级膝关节置换术中系统性抗生素预防的剂量可能会减少。
背景:在原发性全膝关节置换术(pTKA)中,使用系统性抗生素预防(SAP)和抗生素负载骨水泥(ALBC)是降低假体周围关节感染(PJI)风险的公认做法。然而,各国的做法各不相同。本研究的主要目的是比较pTKA + ALBC + SAP与普通骨水泥(PBC) + SAP后PJI翻修的风险,次要目的是评估PJI翻修的风险是否随SAP剂量的变化而变化。方法:2010年至2020年,在丹麦、新西兰、挪威、罗马尼亚和美国的关节置换术登记处登记的289,926例骨关节炎ptka队列。比较了pTKA后使用ALBC + SAP与PBC + SAP、单剂量SAP与多剂量SAP的PJI一年修订。我们使用分布式分析方法计算累积修正百分比(1减去Kaplan-Meier),并使用Cox回归分析在每个注册表中调整风险率比(HRRs)。采用先进的分布式荟萃分析来总结所有国家的hr。结果:在所有pTKA中,64.4%的患者采用了ALBC + SAP。每个注册中心报告了1年PJI的累计修正百分比。结论:当患者在pTKA中接受SAP时,ALBC和PBC具有相似的PJI修正风险,无论SAP剂量多少。在ptka中,ALBC或PBC与SAP联合使用,术前单剂量SAP可能就足够了,不会影响患者的安全。证据等级:三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信