New developments for the Quest for Orthologs benchmark service.

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/nargab/lqae167
Adrian Altenhoff, Yannis Nevers, Vinh Tran, Dushyanth Jyothi, Maria Martin, Salvatore Cosentino, Sina Majidian, Marina Marcet-Houben, Diego Fuentes-Palacios, Emma Persson, Thomas Walsh, Odile Lecompte, Toni Gabaldón, Steven Kelly, Yanhui Hu, Wataru Iwasaki, Salvador Capella-Gutierrez, Christophe Dessimoz, Paul D Thomas, Ingo Ebersberger, Erik Sonnhammer
{"title":"New developments for the Quest for Orthologs benchmark service.","authors":"Adrian Altenhoff, Yannis Nevers, Vinh Tran, Dushyanth Jyothi, Maria Martin, Salvatore Cosentino, Sina Majidian, Marina Marcet-Houben, Diego Fuentes-Palacios, Emma Persson, Thomas Walsh, Odile Lecompte, Toni Gabaldón, Steven Kelly, Yanhui Hu, Wataru Iwasaki, Salvador Capella-Gutierrez, Christophe Dessimoz, Paul D Thomas, Ingo Ebersberger, Erik Sonnhammer","doi":"10.1093/nargab/lqae167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Quest for Orthologs (QfO) orthology benchmark service (https://orthology.benchmarkservice.org) hosts a wide range of standardized benchmarks for orthology inference evaluation. It is supported and maintained by the QfO consortium, and is used to gather ortholog predictions and to examine strengths and weaknesses of newly developed and existing orthology inference methods. The web server allows different inference methods to be compared in a standardized way using the same proteome data. The benchmark results are useful for developing new methods and can help researchers to guide their choice of orthology method for applications in comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis. We here present a new release of the Orthology Benchmark Service with a new benchmark based on feature architecture similarity as well as updated reference proteomes. We further provide a meta-analysis of the public predictions from 18 different orthology assignment methods to reveal how they relate in terms of ortholog predictions and benchmark performance. These results can guide users of orthologs to the best suited method for their purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":33994,"journal":{"name":"NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics","volume":"6 4","pages":"lqae167"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqae167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Quest for Orthologs (QfO) orthology benchmark service (https://orthology.benchmarkservice.org) hosts a wide range of standardized benchmarks for orthology inference evaluation. It is supported and maintained by the QfO consortium, and is used to gather ortholog predictions and to examine strengths and weaknesses of newly developed and existing orthology inference methods. The web server allows different inference methods to be compared in a standardized way using the same proteome data. The benchmark results are useful for developing new methods and can help researchers to guide their choice of orthology method for applications in comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis. We here present a new release of the Orthology Benchmark Service with a new benchmark based on feature architecture similarity as well as updated reference proteomes. We further provide a meta-analysis of the public predictions from 18 different orthology assignment methods to reveal how they relate in terms of ortholog predictions and benchmark performance. These results can guide users of orthologs to the best suited method for their purpose.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
95
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信