Quantifying the spatial distribution of the accumulated dose uncertainty using the novel delta index.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Madelon van den Dobbelsteen, Sara L Hackett, Lando S Bosma, Renate J A van Doormaal, Bram van Asselen, Martin F Fast
{"title":"Quantifying the spatial distribution of the accumulated dose uncertainty using the novel delta index.","authors":"Madelon van den Dobbelsteen, Sara L Hackett, Lando S Bosma, Renate J A van Doormaal, Bram van Asselen, Martin F Fast","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad9dae","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Inter- and intra-fractional anatomical changes during a radiotherapy treatment can cause differences between the initially planned dose and the delivered dose. The total delivered dose can be accumulated over all fractions by using Deformable Image Registration (DIR). However, there is uncertainty in this process which should be accounted for. The aim of this study is to propose a novel metric estimating the spatial distribution of the accumulated dose uncertainty and to evaluate its performance for multi-fraction online adaptive treatments.&#xD;&#xD;Approach: We postulate a new metric, the delta (δ) index, to estimate the uncertainties associated with the dose accumulation process. This metric is calculated for each voxel and takes into account the spatial uncertainty in DIR and local dose differences. For the spatial uncertainty of the DIR, the Distance Discordance Metric (DDM) was used. The accumulated dose and the δ index were determined for ten lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) patients. The δ index was complemented by a more understandable metric, the δ index passing rate, which is the percentage of points satisfying the passing criteria in a region. &#xD;&#xD;Main Results: The spatial distribution of the δ index and the δ index passing rates showed that voxels failing the criteria were predominantly in lower-dose regions. The mean percentage of voxels passing the criterion increased from 65% to 78%, for threshold doses of 20% and 90% of the prescription doses, respectively. &#xD;&#xD;Significance: The δ index was postulated to quantify the spatial distribution of the uncertainties associated with the dose accumulation process. The metric gives an intuitive understanding of the reliability of accumulated dose distributions and derived DVH metrics. The performance of the δ index was evaluated for multi-fraction online adaptive treatments, where a case of sub-optimal image registration was identified by the metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad9dae","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Inter- and intra-fractional anatomical changes during a radiotherapy treatment can cause differences between the initially planned dose and the delivered dose. The total delivered dose can be accumulated over all fractions by using Deformable Image Registration (DIR). However, there is uncertainty in this process which should be accounted for. The aim of this study is to propose a novel metric estimating the spatial distribution of the accumulated dose uncertainty and to evaluate its performance for multi-fraction online adaptive treatments. Approach: We postulate a new metric, the delta (δ) index, to estimate the uncertainties associated with the dose accumulation process. This metric is calculated for each voxel and takes into account the spatial uncertainty in DIR and local dose differences. For the spatial uncertainty of the DIR, the Distance Discordance Metric (DDM) was used. The accumulated dose and the δ index were determined for ten lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) patients. The δ index was complemented by a more understandable metric, the δ index passing rate, which is the percentage of points satisfying the passing criteria in a region. Main Results: The spatial distribution of the δ index and the δ index passing rates showed that voxels failing the criteria were predominantly in lower-dose regions. The mean percentage of voxels passing the criterion increased from 65% to 78%, for threshold doses of 20% and 90% of the prescription doses, respectively. Significance: The δ index was postulated to quantify the spatial distribution of the uncertainties associated with the dose accumulation process. The metric gives an intuitive understanding of the reliability of accumulated dose distributions and derived DVH metrics. The performance of the δ index was evaluated for multi-fraction online adaptive treatments, where a case of sub-optimal image registration was identified by the metric.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信